Posted on 10/23/2025 5:47:11 PM PDT by dennisw
Right-wing provocateur Candace Owens made her boldest claim yet about her former friend Charlie Kirk's assassination in a video posted online Wednesday.
After weeks of spewing conspiracy theories about the assassination, Owens now appears to be explicitly blaming President Donald Trump and members of his administration for Kirk's murder.
'He gave so much of his life to Trump and to politics, and they were just like NOPE. That's it,' Owens said.
'So here's a holiday. What is with them giving them a holiday after they kill them? As soon as they give you a holiday, they definitely killed you. There's no question - they killed you.'
After being snubbed from speaking at Kirk's memorial in Arizona last month, Owens stated that the memorial event, attended by nearly 100,000 people, was 'being controlled by the White House.
'Why would I be invited by anyone in Trump's Zionist administration, as I am speaking about the topics that I am speaking... It's common sense they're not going to allow me to share the stage,' Owens added at the time.
The right-wing podcaster also attacked the Daily Mail for claiming that she was 'snubbed' from the event, but she did not even attend the memorial as a guest.
She has additionally not been asked to join the national Turning Point speaking tour being continued by his friends in Kirk's honor, and has also not joined the podcast being carried on by Kirk's Turning Point USA staff.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Don’t make me click on a link. Just tell me what the clip says. If you refuse, it indicates you have no evidence and no argument.
If Charlie “stopped communicating with Candace a year ago,” then why did he include her in the group text where he posted:
“Jewish donors play into all the stereotypes. I cannot and will not be bullied like this. Leaving me no choice but to leave the pro Israel cause.”
Don’t make me click on a link. Just tell me what the clip says. If you refuse, it indicates you have no evidence and no argument.
We’re investigating the people who were around Charlie on the day he was assassinated and in the period preceding that.
This is an investigation. Why are you afraid of an investigation?
Is it worth watching Candace’s videos to check it with what you’re saying?
In other words, are you okay with people researching it themselves?
Or do you want everyone to just take your word for it?
They make her look like the loon she has become. And these aren't doctored.
If you can't stomach watching your heroine make a fool of herself, then this conversation is over.
Dealing with heroine worshippers that can't see their heroines with the feet of mud they actually possess is sad. Have the last word, but do get help soon. Because if you actually think she has anything good to say, you're in trouble, mentally and spiritually.
Or maybe she'll have another dream that you came and helped her from her big bad (and correct) critics on FR.
If you’re mentally capable of analyzing her statements, then you’re able to post them here.
But maybe you don’t want to post the statements of Candace Owens here, because you know it will make my case that she hasn’t said anything untrue or grossly erroneous.
All I’m asking for is honest discussion.
Because of this, “intervention fatigue” or neo-isolationism gained traction. People began questioning whether the U.S. could (or should) act as the “world’s policeman,” especially when the outcomes seemed to undermine stability rather than enhance it. That sentiment crosses party lines — with both progressives and some conservatives preferring a focus on domestic priorities rather than foreign wars.
You can see this reflected in how politicians now frame their foreign policy: more emphasis on strategic restraint, “ending forever wars”, and focusing on domestic renewal rather than nation-building abroad.
Would you like me to show how this shift has affected U.S. foreign policy decisions in the 2020s (for example, with Ukraine, Israel, or China)?
The PRC Loves American Isolationism.
Islam has the world’s most successful forever war of Jihad imperialism and colonialism, for the last 1400 years. Two other forever wars are run by China, and the lesser one by Russia. Russia always wanting more European vassal states.
“Would you like me to show how this shift has affected U.S. foreign policy decisions in the 2020s (for example, with Ukraine, Israel, or China)?”
The PRC, Russia and The Jihad love the Tucker Carlson trend of isolationism, that hurts Ukraine and Israel. Islam is conducting a successful Hijrah-Immigration https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijrah war against Europe. The Israel/Jew question means who do you support in the eternal Jews vs Islamic Jihad wars. The crux of the problem is that Islam doctrine claims that once a Muslim territory is taken by Infidels (Spain and Israel), that the Islamic Ummah can never rest until this territory is taken back. Osama Bin Ladin complained about The Reconquista that drove Islam out of Spain.
How was Islam able to conquer Spain? Because the Spanish kings were divided, to where some allied with Islamic armies to defeat their rivals, other Spanish kings.
Yes indeed you did. Plenty of it. This is how "reasonisfaith" manipulates every discussion. Ignores and doesn't address anything of substance, then says you provided no evidence to back your assertions while ignoring everything you actually said - rinse, and repeat - same thing over and over. On another thread he/she claimed to be unaware of the things said that are the subject of this thread - but here he/she is present on this very thread, so obviously, they were aware - and claimed I was lying about the existence of these remarks.
She’s literally lost her mind. WHAT is wrong with Candace?? My husband says she’s desperate for attention. I think it goes much deeper than that…
Candace __ Clowning for clicks
Candace Owens...
she is a nobody, no nothing,
why does any one care about what she says or what she thinks?
An ironic claim she just wanted honest debate.
You nailed it, she doesn't want discussion at all, or she's incapable of debating because she's simply trying to manipulate the conversation.
As a result, I have no intention of replying to her again because her manipulations make it all pointless.
But Candace Owens is very reasonable in her analysis of what happened to Charlie Kirk.
Tyler Robinson was in fact a patsy.
The camera behind Charlie contained a device, likely a zip gun type device.
The projectile was likely a .22 cal LR hollowpoint.
All TPUSA that were close to Charlie are suspect for either being involved or knowing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.