Posted on 10/14/2025 10:28:36 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Back in September, a judge ordered Loudoun County Public Schools (LCPS) to halt the suspensions of boys who complained about a "trans identifying" girl filming them in their locker room, and the Department of Education (DOE) slapped the district with Title IX violations.
Initially, three boys -- a Muslim and two Christians -- were slapped with the suspensions. The punishment was later dropped against the Muslim boy, while the two Christians faced a ten-day suspension for "sexual harassment and sex based discrimination."
The girl who filmed the boys in the locker room without their consent didn't face such consequences, and LCPS refused to investigate the boys' claims of sexual harassment and sex based discrimination against them.
Parents of the two boys in question are trying to sue LCPS, and a judge has ordered them to post a $125,000 bond by Wednesday in order for the lawsuit to continue.
It's absolutely insane.
The entire post reads:
The parents are suing the school board to overturn the school district's decision to suspend and punish their sons for Title IX sexual harassment and discrimination after the boys questioned why a girl was in the boys locker room and expressed their discomfort.
U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema ordered the parents who are suing Loudoun County Public Schools (LCPS) to post a $125,000 bond by the close of business on Wednesday, Oct. 15, 2025. The order aims to ensure that if LCPS prevails on dispositive pre-trial motions, LCPS can recover from that bond its attorney’s fees.
Seth Wolfe and Renae Smith are suing the Loudoun County School Board after the school system opened a Title IX investigation into their sons. Wolfe and Smith said their sons simply questioned why a female student was in the boys' locker room...
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
![]() |
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
For $125k you could probably find an educational alternative. If they lose their case they could be on the hook for a lot more, and there are judges who would like to make an example of parents off the reservation.
An opportunity for Winsome Earle-Sears
Some parents need to make an example of this judge.
Sometime around 2am.
L
Filming children in a locker room is A-OK — if you are a sexual deviant.
A Clinton appointee.
This ping list is for the other articles of interest to homeschoolers about education and public school. This can occasionally be a fairly high volume list. Articles pinged to the Another Reason to Homeschool List will be given the keyword of ARTH. (If I remember. If I forget, please feel free to add it yourself)
The main Homeschool Ping List handles the homeschool-specific articles. I hold both the Homeschool Ping List and the Another Reason to Homeschool Ping list. Please freepmail me to let me know if you would like to be added to or removed from either list, or both.
Make vigilantism great again.
Trans-schmans... I would think anyone videoing people in a locker room without consent would be actionable.
And by actionable, I mean beating the crap out of them and destroying the phone.
Another US District court judge ruling for Wokism.
Why were the Christian boys suspended and the Muslim was not?
I’m getting pissed about this.
A fed district judge could have required anyone suing Trump to post a bond as well. Obviously this left wing judge is making the cost of due process too high for these parents. The bond rule is not being applied equally.
MY KIDS WOULD BE UNDER THE CONTROL OF A 24 HOUR TUTOR SO FAST, IT WOULD BE AMAZING
If U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema is the judge, you can guarantee that the school district will win the pretrial motions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.