Posted on 09/29/2025 7:06:26 AM PDT by Openurmind
A disturbing YouTube channel was dedicated entirely to showing AI-generated videos of women being shot in the head, 404 Media reports.
Named “Woman Shot AI,” the channel racked up more than 175,000 views since starting on June 20, 2025, the outlet’s investigation found. After 404 sent YouTube a request for comment, the channel was finally taken down.
It left behind a grisly legacy. The veritable snuff film hub uploaded 27 videos and gained a following of nearly 1,200 subscribers — a small but alarming following, as you’ll see later.
The videos all adhered to a general formula, according to 404: a photo-realistic depiction of a woman begging for her life while she was being held at gunpoint by a man who loomed over her in the foreground.
Original at 404 Media behind paywall:
https://www.404media.co/ai-generated-youtube-channel-uploaded-nothing-but-videos-of-women-being-shot/
Would they do the same if it was men?
or gays?
or illegals?
Real nice! Seek help now!
That’s one of the problems with Ai is every sicko out there with a sick fetish is going to make videos of what they are into, whether it’s pedo crap, snuff films, horror films of people being tortured or worse Hillary as President videos. A lot of Ai programs have blocks to prevent that but needless to say they found ways around it.
What a brave new world. Nobody predicted this
Or scenes from Hollywood movies?
You know it is bad when even Google takes it down that fast.
YouTube has GOT to do something about AI. It’s destroying the channel. Even for something far more mundane: I like watching videos about science, history, etc. But lately, most videos I come across are crappy AI. At first, they seem pretty good: a very realistic voice, some stock photo images.
But then you notice that although their imitation of human speech is surprisingly good, they make mistakes in reading the script that no human would make: pronouncing the adjective, “live” (as in “live music”) like the verb (as in “live free or die”). Or pronouncing “Reagan” as “ree-GANN.”
And then, they come to the next chapter or item, and they use the same exact text. Sometimes, it’s not even the next chapter: they’ll just repeat the same sentence six times in 12 sentences.
And then they move to the next verbal topic, but the stock photos don’t change topic.
AI slop is destroying human creativity. Btw, a lot of the AI slop you see on YouTube originate in Africa and other third world places. Look up AI slop on YouTube.
And it’s only going to get worse, every month there are new “advances” and new things it destroys.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79-bApI3GIU
I pretty much quit going there at all...
The problem must be YouTube’s monetization: which is likely enough partly done
...by AI.
I bet AI snuff murdering MAGA supporters or white people are just fine.
The only AI on YouTube I’ve enjoyed are those 2-minute movies trailers done in 1950’s and 1970’s style
For instance, The Matrix in 1950’s super Panavision.
The only AI on YouTube I’ve enjoyed are those 2-minute movies trailers done in 1950’s and 1970’s style
For instance, The Matrix in 1950’s super Panavision.
Spot on.
Youtube is loaded with more trash than an Indian river.
“The veritable snuff film hub”
veritable:
adjective
being in fact the thing named and not false, unreal, or imaginary
It’s either AI or real, it can’t be both.
I love those! That’s about the extent of my AI consumption when it comes to Youtube.
I did see these videos that got pulled and was more interested in what prompts he used to generate the videos than the content. I mean, when I asked Gemini for a list of erotic horror movies, it scolded me and told me that was not suitable for any conversation and flat out refused to help me. But apparently it will generate the images for you. Oh, Google, you contrary dictator you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.