Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The ‘Follow the Science’ Crowd Seldom Does
American Thinker ^ | August 31, 2025 | M. Walter

Posted on 08/31/2025 10:43:48 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

Sometimes you just have to look at a thing to know it’s nuts. Other times, you have to extrapolate a thing out to its inevitable end to know it’s nuts, but then there it is: it’s nuts.

Lefties have trouble extrapolating. They clearly have trouble with what is real and obvious (i.e., X/X = Female, X/Y = Male), but the things you need only think through just a little bit elude them, too. Have you noticed? They simply don’t extrapolate. Even a little.

They’re often so anti-science, so counter-factual, so self-destructive that it goes beyond simply not following “the science.” They’re not following friggin’ gravity. The simple rules of being. Just being. Being human. On earth. Where there are actions and consequences. They. Just. Don’t. Think. That. Way.

So let’s do it for them. Let’s look at a few things they really haven’t thought through.

X/Y Men & X/X Women & “Gender-affirming care”

How is it “gender-affirming” to cut body parts off? The left is known for calling things Orwellian names, but I think “gender-affirming care” for the willful mutilation of one’s body must be the most Orwellian. They try to get around this by saying “gender” is different from “sex,” but then why chop off body parts if the whole thing is just a “construct”? Can’t you just “construct” your “gender-identity” without a scalpel? Since when does personal affirmation of anything depend on somebody else graduating from medical school?

There’s nothing—nothing—in the great American experiment of Liberty that requires someone else’s labor in order to “affirm” you. That’s the whole point. So this is communistic thinking, in my opinion. If you can’t achieve personal affirmation without somebody taking a scalpel to you, then how healthy is it? I think that question answers itself.

The whole thing is communistic, anti-science gobbledygook.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: xyxx
“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” --George Orwell
1 posted on 08/31/2025 10:43:48 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

.04% . That is the amount of CO2 in the atomsphere. Because of that tiny amount we are suppose to reinvent Civilization itself. No thanks.


2 posted on 08/31/2025 10:47:04 AM PDT by Nateman (Democrats did not strive for fraud friendly voting merely to continue honest elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Ministry of Truth update

Islam is peace

Capitalism is slavery

Diversity is strength

Welcome to the new 1984!


3 posted on 08/31/2025 10:48:39 AM PDT by Nateman (Democrats did not strive for fraud friendly voting merely to continue honest elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Gender beliefs
Climate Change beliefs
Evolution beliefs

I don’t consider any of it to be “science”.


4 posted on 08/31/2025 10:51:54 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Society has no reward for following the rules any more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman
.04% . That is the amount of CO2 in the atomsphere. Because of that tiny amount we are suppose to reinvent Civilization itself. No thanks.

Man is responsible for 3.4% of that 0.04%

The total amount of anthropogenic CO2 In the atmosphere is therefore 0.0014%

Completely eliminate man's contribution and the Earth's atmosphere still contains 0.04% CO2.

5 posted on 08/31/2025 10:52:18 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Democrats are the Party of racism, anger, hate and violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Gender beliefs
Climate Change beliefs
Evolution beliefs

I don’t consider any of it to be “science”.

Belief - the Left worships at the altars of their ever changing "beliefs." Anyone who disagrees is committing blasphemy.

One of my best, real science professors was a great example of real science. Every week, she would say:

This (XYZ) we know

This (XYZ) we think we know.

All this other stuff, we have no idea.

6 posted on 08/31/2025 11:02:17 AM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus III (Do, or do not, there is no try )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Should be “follow the emotion”, or “follow the groupthink”.


7 posted on 08/31/2025 11:05:05 AM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

To quote the bard, George Costanza: “A lie is not a lie if you believe it”


8 posted on 08/31/2025 11:15:03 AM PDT by llevrok (Keep buggering on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I have determined that the “follow the science” crowd usually doesn’t know any science or understand technology.


9 posted on 08/31/2025 11:21:06 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson