Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 07/22/2025 8:24:33 PM PDT by Morgana
A three-year-old girl was triggered to enter precocious puberty following exposure to her trans-identified father’s “gender affirming” topical estrogen gel. The toddler was seen by pediatric endocrinologists after experiencing breast development and vaginal discharge over a time frame of six months.
The father, a male who identifies as a “woman,” told clinicians that he was having daily skin-to-skin contact with the toddler girl, despite his daily application of estradiol gel 3.75mg to his chest, abdomen, shoulders, and thighs. He had previously been using an estradiol spray on his forearms only.
A case study, first published in the European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology in 2023, describes the toddler’s exposure to her father’s synthetic hormones as “inadvertent.”
According to the study, a “physical examination of the girl revealed a Tanner stage III for breast and Tanner stage I for pubic hair development. Height was 108.1 cm (+3,2 SD), weight 19.7 kg (+0,54 SD) and bone age advanced to 6.9 years (Greulich and Pyle). Pelvic ultrasound demonstrated increased size for age of both uterus and endometrium corresponding to Tanner stage III-IV.”
The Tanner stages refer to a puberty classification system that ranges from I, pre-pubertal, to V, which represents the final adult stage.
At Tanner III, a girl’s breasts are described as having “breast tissue palpable outside of the areola, [with] no areolar development.” Precocious puberty is defined as the onset of any Tanner stage II secondary sex characteristics prior to age 8 in girls, or 9 in boys.
Reviewing the case, developmental biologist Emma Hilton noted on X that the toddler girl was “just about ready for a training bra. Normal for a 10-to-12-year-old.” She also noted that the toddler’s “uterus development was approaching Tanner stage 4. That’s period territory.”
From the case study, it appears that the girl’s condition was reversed when the exposure to her father’s medication stopped.
“The hormone therapy of the father was changed from a gel to a transdermal patch, and the girl experienced regression of breast development, normalization of growth velocity, pelvic ultrasound and GnRH stimulation test,” reads the case study.
Hilton, again posting to X, said that it may not be so simple: “And another note: his daughter’s precocious puberty ‘receded’ after exposure to estrogen was stopped. The assumption is that all is now ‘reset.’- I’d advocate caution there,” she wrote.
In another post, she told an X user that she is unsure if the girl will go on to experience a “normal” or “second” puberty, or if she will remain taller for her age. “I’m not sure there can be answer to that. It’s possibly unprecedented,” posted Hilton.
The case study concludes that the father must not have known the risks of exogenous estradiol exposure to his 3-year-old girl.
“Transgender persons should be thoroughly informed of the risk of transmission of transdermal hormones and be advised to wash hands, use gloves and avoid skin contact shortly after hormone application. Patients with children must be warned of the risk and Gender Clinics should consider the possibility of prescribing alternative routes of administration such as tablets or patches in high-risk patients.”
No follow up to the case study has been published since.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Disgusting.
Sigh
Sick bass turd.
>>“Transgender persons should be thoroughly informed of the risk of transmission of transdermal hormones and be advised to wash hands, use gloves and avoid skin contact shortly after hormone application.”
Or, maybe mentally ill freaks shouldn’t be allowed near children...
Just gross! Skin to skin contact with a baby!
The trans world is a screwed up world.
‘Skin to skin’ contact happens all the time in normal families with babies. The problem here is the estrogen gel.
What a Godless sick demented world the liberals are leading everyone to...
Just when I thought we might have reached Peak creepy.
I about threw up in the back of my mouth thinking about this creature touching that child.
Very.
Just plain evil.
‘Or, maybe mentally ill freaks shouldn’t be allowed near children’
Anywhere ever at all.
We need Jesus now more than ever.
It’s satanic.
Thank you for clarifying that. Indeed, when my daughter was an infant, she delighted in crawling around on me, whether I had a shirt on or not. It made for some funny moments, but also some beautiful loving ones. There is nothing so peaceful and soul-fulfilling as your infant falling asleep on you. Babies need human contact, and that was true long before humans invented clothing.
Pure evil. This is the work of Satan ruining souls.
The problem here is the pervert.
Sadly.
This is the sickest thing I’ve read since “Price” month ended.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.