Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists discover Pfizer COVID jab linked to eye changes that raise corneal damage risk
Daily Mail UK ^ | 07/18/2025 | Chris Melore

Posted on 07/18/2025 9:51:17 AM PDT by vespa300

Scientists have discovered that Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine may increase the risk of eye damage, leading to vision loss.

The new study specifically examined how the vaccine affected patients' corneas, the clear front part of the eye that allows light to enter.

In 64 people, scientists in Turkey measured changes in the cornea's inner layer, called the endothelium, before taking the first Pfizer dose and two months after receiving the second.

Results revealed that taking both doses of the vaccine led to thicker corneas, fewer endothelial cells in the eye and more variation in size of these specialized cells that form the endothelium.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: arrestalbertbourla; biologicalwarfare; chinavirusvaccine; pfizer; warcrimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
The scientists are from Turkey so who knows...still glad I didn't get that jab.
1 posted on 07/18/2025 9:51:17 AM PDT by vespa300
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vespa300

still no safety issues with ivermectin


2 posted on 07/18/2025 9:55:22 AM PDT by joshua c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vespa300
Based on overwhelming emerging research, there seems to be very few organ systems that were not at risk to damage by the covid vax.

The Covid vax seems to present a general systemic risks of damage.

3 posted on 07/18/2025 9:56:55 AM PDT by rdcbn1 (TV )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vespa300

Covid vaccines are safe and affective. Affective as in psychologically rewarding to those wishing to engadge in virtue signaling and political affiliation with “the smart people trust the science bunch”. That is all.


4 posted on 07/18/2025 10:02:57 AM PDT by DariusBane (Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept? Vive Deo et Vives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn1

rdcbn1 wrote: “Based on overwhelming emerging research, there seems to be very few organ systems that were not at risk to damage by the covid vax.”

Based on overwhelming emerging research, there seems to be very few organ systems that were not at risk to damage by the covid virus.


5 posted on 07/18/2025 10:05:29 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: joshua c

joshua c wrote: “still no safety issues with ivermectin”

Irrelevant since ivermectin is ineffective.


6 posted on 07/18/2025 10:06:19 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vespa300

bttt


7 posted on 07/18/2025 10:07:51 AM PDT by Pajamajan (Pray for our nation. Never be a slave in a new Socialist America. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vespa300

All according to plan.


8 posted on 07/18/2025 10:09:27 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Democrats are the Party of racism, anger, hate and violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

So it’s a shame that people who took the jab were more likely to catch covid again, and to have more severe cases - with those results becoming more pronounced with each successive jab, especially after the first booster.


9 posted on 07/18/2025 10:14:11 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

bookmark


10 posted on 07/18/2025 10:23:55 AM PDT by freds6girlies (many that are first shall be last; and the last shall be first. Mt. 19:30. R.I.P. G & J)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vespa300

How about very dry eyes, forever, after the second Covid shot?


11 posted on 07/18/2025 10:33:11 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Drones haves changed fighting wars/with Navy/Army top water or below and anything that flies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
rdcbn1 wrote: “Based on overwhelming emerging research, there seems to be very few organ systems that were not at risk to damage by the covid vax.”

Based on overwhelming emerging research, there seems to be very few organ systems that were not at risk to damage by the covid virus.


The Covid spike protein was bio engineered for cytotoxicity and so both the Covid virus and the mRNA vax can potentially do serious damage

However, clinical research is consistently showing that the most serious and pervasive damage has been done by the mRNA vax and not an infection by the Covid virus itself for a number of reasons.

This research is confirmed by testing that demonstrates that people suffering from vax related side effects never has a corresponding Covid virus infection and the fact that some of the most serious and debilitating vax injuries occurred in young people who demographically were at virtually zero risk from the Covid virus and do not test positive for any prior Covid infection.

There is also little to no evidence of persistent spike protein blood serum concentration in post Covid virus infections but there is overwhelming evidence that there is persistent spike protein presence due to vax years after the vax .

This suggests that the mRNA shots have modified a persons physiology such that a persons body begins replicating and producing not just the mRNA vax spike proteins originally used for the vax , but a whole range of novel spike proteins produced via transcription errors in a pseudo mutation process that effectively become a "synthetic evolution" system where an individuals body begins to manufacture new, novel spike protein variants with unknown toxicity or potential for serious side effects.

These novel spike proteins can be destruction on their own and they can also create a risk of spike protein modification to the active Covid virus to create new, novel Covid virus variants with potentially enhanced gain of function in Covid compromised vax recipients suffering from Antibody-dependent enhancement

12 posted on 07/18/2025 10:37:24 AM PDT by rdcbn1 (TV )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vespa300
I have a family member who was injected with these toxins who just went completely blind in one eye and the “specialists” can't figure out what caused the sudden loss of eyesight. No questions about the death and disability ModifiedRNA injections they have taken. They are also suddenly showing huge cognitive decline in their 60’s. It is all terrible.

The spouse also took the injections and has had trouble with their eyesight since with different issues along with other freaky health issues.

These things should have been pulled years ago but there is a larger agenda at hand.

13 posted on 07/18/2025 10:50:33 AM PDT by 444Flyer (John 3, Revelation 20, Joshua 24:15, 1 Kings 18:16-39, Pick a side...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vespa300

https://duckduckgo.com/?t=h_&q=Eye+problems+after+covid+vaccine&ia=web


14 posted on 07/18/2025 10:57:04 AM PDT by 444Flyer (John 3, Revelation 20, Joshua 24:15, 1 Kings 18:16-39, Pick a side...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn1

Careful reviews by CDC experts have found nine deaths in the United States linked to a rare blood-clotting condition after the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. No other deaths have been confirmed as caused by any COVID shot, out of hundreds of millions of doses given. That works out to far less than one death per million doses, many times lower than the risk of dying from COVID itself.

Some teens and young adults can get mild myocarditis after an mRNA dose, but most cases clear with rest, and catching COVID is still more likely to hurt the heart than the vaccine. In most people, being vaccinated on shots actually reduced the risk of strokes, heart attacks, and clots.


15 posted on 07/18/2025 12:52:17 PM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

butterdezillion wrote: “So it’s a shame that people who took the jab were more likely to catch covid again, and to have more severe cases - with those results becoming more pronounced with each successive jab, especially after the first booster.”

Simply not true.

“Cleveland Clinic Study Did Not Show Vaccines Increase COVID-19 Risk”

Numerous studies have found that additional COVID-19 shots are generally associated with extra protection against the coronavirus. Many people on social media, however, have shared a preliminary finding from a Cleveland Clinic study and misrepresented it as proving that getting more doses increases a person’s risk of infection.

https://www.factcheck.org/2023/06/scicheck-cleveland-clinic-study-did-not-show-vaccines-increase-covid-19-risk/


16 posted on 07/18/2025 12:55:42 PM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
Careful reviews by CDC experts have found nine deaths in the United States linked to a rare blood-clotting condition after the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. No other deaths have been confirmed as caused by any COVID shot, out of hundreds of millions of doses given. That works out to far less than one death per million doses, many times lower than the risk of dying from COVID itself.

Some teens and young adults can get mild myocarditis after an mRNA dose, but most cases clear with rest, and catching COVID is still more likely to hurt the heart than the vaccine. In most people, being vaccinated on shots actually reduced the risk of strokes, heart attacks, and clots.


Your information demonstrably false information based on multiple peer reviewed, published clinical research reports - many from research at places like Stanford University and Yale med schools.

17 posted on 07/18/2025 1:07:51 PM PDT by rdcbn1 (TV )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

I think you’re doing what your tagine says.

IIRC the largest, most complete study on this was done in Japan and showed just what I said.

Also Factcheck is not credible. They lied about seeing Obama’s birth certificate, when the image they shared showed distortion from the page fold that was the opposite of what it should have been, based on experiments I did using the same fold. And since then the HDOH has indirectly confirmed 3 times that there is no valid birth certificate for Obama in Hawaii.

So the people you’re relying on are known liars.


18 posted on 07/18/2025 1:24:41 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

butterdezillion wrote: “I think you’re doing what your tagine says.”

Perhaps but I think the anti-vaxxers are very guilty of ‘Picking the expert who says the things they agree with.’ scouring the web for ‘experts’ who reinforce their anti-vaxxer beliefs while rejecting any information that contradicts that belief.

For example, using irrelevant criteria such as Obama’s birth certificate to reject real data on vaccines. A quick web search will reveal multiple sources other than Fact Check thar repudiate your claim.

butterdezillion wrote: “So the people you’re relying on are known liars.”

The people you rely upon for anti-vaxxer information are known grifters profiting from snake oil and web clicks.


19 posted on 07/18/2025 2:06:59 PM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

I’m not apt to trust sources who I know from first-hand experience are liars. I don’t think that the people doing the scientific study in Japan (the only source I mentioned) are profiting from snake oil and web clicks. Nor do I think that Stanford and the other sources mentioned by another poster are profiting that way. And the subject of this thread is a study by scientists in Turkey. Are you really claiming that they just want clicks on a website? And do you really believe that a “fact-checking” site that only mentions one study rather than doing a meta-study of all the scientific research is NOT cherry-picking sources?

Anthony Fauci, though, has financial stakes in the pharmaceutical companies, as do a bunch of people who wanted to hide the safety information on their products until - what? 2080?

I’m not interested in this conversation because you are making assumptions about me that are not true and are accusing me of the very things you are doing. For instance, I am not even an anti-vaxxer, and you’re accusing me of things based solely on your assumption that I am.

No thank you.

Have a good life.


20 posted on 07/18/2025 3:20:21 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson