Posted on 05/28/2025 11:49:24 AM PDT by V_TWIN
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Tensions stemming from the ongoing negotiations between Russia and Ukraine to bring the years-long war to an end threatened to boil over once again, as President Donald Trump responded to Vladimir Putin's charge of him being emotional with an all-caps social media post.
After the Russian president publicly speculated that his American counterpart was responding too emotionally, Trump posted a scathing denial on social media in all capital letters to inform Putin of just how off-base he was.
"ABSOLUTELY FALSE AND A COMPLETELY STUPID THING TO SAY," Trump's message began. "IF CRAZY PUTIN THINKS I AM BEING EMOTIONAL, HE'S GOT ANOTHER THING COMING. I AM NOT BEING EMOTIONAL, AND IF HE THINKS I AM, THEN HE'S A BIGGER MORON THAN I EVER EXPECTED. HE'S ALSO A TOTAL CHROME DOME WHO WISHES HE COULD HAVE MY HAIR. SAD! MAYBE A VISIT FROM SOME STEALTH BOMBERS WILL SHOW HIM HOW CALM AND NON-EMOTIONAL I AM. BAD IDEA, PUTIN. NOT SMART!"
"I'M NOT EMOTIONAL," he concluded.
White House aides reportedly talked President Trump out of responding with a large-scale invasion of Russia to prove to Putin that he was not responding emotionally. They were unsuccessful in steering him away from increasing tariffs on all Russian imports to 800%. "He said this was something he planned all along," one insider said. "He said there wasn't anything emotional about it."
At publishing time, sources said that President Trump had last been seen writing "HOW'S THIS FOR EMOTIONAL?" with a Sharpie marker on bombs before ordering preparations to be made for an airstrike on Moscow.
“Trump didn’t know about the attack on Putin’s chopper when he said that because the gaslight media lies by omission.
One of the rules of war is you don’t take out the other side’s leader. Putin could have vaporized Zelensky long ago, but didn’t.”
So you just made that up and now you are sleazily trying to slink out of it, as usual.
“ One of the rules of war is you don’t take out the other side’s leader.”
What planet are you on?
The first attacks are always on “Command and Control.”
Who exactly do you think you aim at in those conditions?
“You are free to tell another lie and then you can move on.”
Prove I lied or be quiet.
“So you just made that up and now you are sleazily trying to slink out of it, as usual.”
Why do you think your “facts” should not be challenged? If you are going to ask for citations from others you should expect them to request the same e from you.
“Trump didn’t know about the attack on Putin’s chopper when he said that “
LOL! Trump didn’t say that ...
He is on earth.
Deliberately assassinating world leaders in war is (and has been) prohibited by numerous treaties going back almost 500 years.
Name one.
Google it yourself.
I’m not your bitch.
I guess it only matters when it’s YOUR fearless leader being targeted. LOL
Putin be pootin’ in his pants the other night huh?
It was only after this that I checked the source. LoL
He didn't actually say that.
It's a Babylon Bee story.
I saw that later. But thanks for letting me know.
I was like “WHAT?”
The Bee got me this time..
You can say whatever you want. Your opinion means nothing. Targeting enemy leaders you’re at war with is against many treaties and conventions.
Fact.
Again…name one. Just one.
Convincing satire. Good job.
So convincing that people on this thread got in a pissing contest. SMH
I’m not doing your homework for you. If you’re too lazy to look it up, then that’s your problem.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.