Posted on 05/08/2025 12:35:01 PM PDT by Red Badger
Ozempic and other drugs like it have been threatening the established diet industry since they premiered — and it appears that Weight Watchers is now getting the hatchet.
In a note to investors, the long-running weight loss company is taking the "strategic action" of filing for bankruptcy in hopes of consolidating its immense $1.15 billion dollars' worth of debt.
The move comes nearly eighteen months after Oprah Winfrey, a Weight Watchers investor who served as the celebrity face and body of the diet company, admitted that she had started taking weight loss drugs like Novo Nordisk's Ozempic and Wegovy.
Just a few months after that, Winfrey announced that she was exiting WW's board of directors and questioned the company's purpose alongside the advent of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist drugs, the class of medications to which Ozempic and other popular weight loss injectables belong. The drugs are believed to work by mimicking the stomach's feeling of fullness, lowering blood sugar in diabetics and preventing overeating in non-diabetic overweight people.
Though WW mentioned neither Ozempic nor the class of drugs it belongs to in its bankruptcy statement, its specter haunted the announcement — especially because the company is apparently looking to expand its telehealth services.
Back in October, WW announced that it would be offering compounded versions of semaglutide, the GLP-1 behind Novo Nordisk's Ozempic and Wegovy. That branded compounding market, however, is both clogged with companies looking to cash in on the GLP-1 craze and, more importantly, rife with safety and quality control concerns.
Considering that workout meetings were once considered the company's main value proposition — one that had already been existentially threatened by the rise of fitness apps years before the GLP-1 revolution — it's not exactly surprising that WW's compounded GLP-1 gambit hasn't taken off as the company may have liked.
Confirmation of WW's filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, which will not cease its operations but rather help it reorganize its structure and consolidate its debt, follows leaks to the Wall Street Journal last month that it was preparing for the filing.
In a WSJ interview following the confirmation of the bankruptcy news, artist and veteran WW member Naomi Nemtzow expressed her frustration at the company's pivot to telehealth and weight loss meds. As the New York Times documented back in 2023, the company abruptly ended its meeting in her Brooklyn neighborhood, leaving a void that she and her fellow former Weight Watchers had to fill themselves.
"Basically they gave up on the kind of work they had been doing and went on to selling Ozempic. They jumped on that bandwagon," the 75-year-old artist told the newspaper. "It’s become a quick fix, a fashion thing."
Critical impressions aside, Nemtzow's irked opinion does seem to indicate that WW is now suffering for its attempts to stay apace of the latest weight loss trend instead of doubling down on its bread and butter.
Then again, Weight Watchers was also a huge part of the fad diet craze in the 1990s and 2000s — so maybe, this is nature taking its course.
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
“ questioned the company’s purpose alongside the advent of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist drugs”
Yeah, that’s the problem right there. It should not just be about weight. That makes it sound vain. They should have taken cue from RFKj and made it more about health. Sure, losing 5% of excess weight is clinically meaningful; 10% even better. If a drug helps, well, ok it’s probably not the ideal way but that is good (not factoring for any side effects or long term after affects). But WW advertises like “eat whatever you want” - it’s not a meaningful change in approach. It’s just about the results, by whatever means.
But I guess it’s just an easier sell; or rather a harder sell to tell overweight people they need to change their lifestyle. Going Keto or Atkins or Carnivore/ caveman (they are all variations of the same basic idea) is probably more fun and fulfilling than buying boxed microwave lasagna. With Keto, you can eat as much as you want as long as it has no carbohydrates. Go ahead, eat 12 chicken legs for lunch. It’s allowed. And more fun.
So that new statue in New York came from Weight Watchers ?.
Must been their mascot!..............
I had a stomach bypass 10 years ago. They made it plain that it wasn’t simply to loose weight, which you do, but a complete lifestyle change. Otherwise, you end up right back where you started...
I like WW online a lot, but attending the meetings and weighing in was detrimental to the program. I hope they keep the online portion of WW. There is no way I would take the weight loss drugs unless I was desperate. Ozempic has weird side effects.
Looks like it
Also looks like Letitia James!..............
**But I guess it’s just an easier sell; or rather a harder sell to tell overweight people they need to change their lifestyle.**
Discipline works! Exercise and eating right.
People think they are supposed to eat 3 decent sized meals a day. Well, very few people are working physically demanding jobs anymore, yet still eat as though they rack 1,000 square hay bales a day.
(My biggest day was over 40 years ago: 1,300+ bales)
It’s true, having loss and regained weight multiple times, it wasn’t until I dealt with the interior and stopped making excuses that I have finally overcome yo-yo dieting.
I have a friend who lost a ton of weight on WW, but only eating the 0 point foods. When she described what she ate, I’m like that is KETO, lol.
My MIL on the other hand did weight watcher for decades and lost very little. But she ate low fat, and plenty of carbs. But still stayed within her points.
She made her millions and is now knifing them. Ozempic can cripple and or kill you.
Opray: Winfrey announced that she was exiting WW’s board of directors and questioned the company’s purpose
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.