Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hegseth Announces ‘Historic’ Military Reforms
Trending Politics ^ | 5/5/2025 | Cullen McCue

Posted on 05/06/2025 9:42:54 AM PDT by Signalman

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced Monday that the U.S. Military will soon be undergoing a massive reduction in the number of general officers across all branches.

In a video statement posted to social media, Hegseth announced the General and Flag Officer Reductions initiative, or as he calls it, the “Less Generals, More GI’s,” reform.

“It’s a historic one, and it’s in keeping with President Trump’s commitment to achieving peace through strength. We’re going to shift resources from bloated headquarters elements to our warfighters,” the Defense Secretary said.

Hegseth then provided a brief history lesson on the military’s historic command, noting that during World War II, the U.S. Military consisted of 12 million service members across all branches. “For that 12-million-man element, we had 17 four and five-star generals,” Hegseth explained.

Today, the U.S. Military consists of 2.1 million service members, with 44 four-star and flag officers. In the past, the ratio was one general for every 6,000 troops, while today, it is one general for every 1,400 service members.

“More generals and admirals does not equal more success,” the Defense Secretary continued. “Now this is not a slash and burn exercise meant to punish high-ranking officers. Nothing could be further from the truth. This has been a deliberative process, working with the Joint Chiefs of Staff, with one goal, maximizing strategic readiness and operational effectiveness by making prudent reductions in the general and flag officer ranks.”

Hegseth further explained the reforms will be enacted under two phases, with the first consisting of a comprehensive review of the nation’s current service structure. In the second phase, the Department of Defense will conduct a strategic review of the unified command plan.

All in all, Hegseth described the plan as the most extensive review of U.S. Military structure since the Goldwater-Nichols Defense Reorganization Act of 1986. “That was a generational change in combat command structures, planning, training, geographic areas of responsibility, mission, and operational responsibilities,” Hegseth said.

Under phase one, the plan will result in a 20 percent reduction of four-star generals and flag officers for active duty elements, along with a 20 percent reduction of general and flag officers in the National Guard Bureau. Phase two will “produce a minimum of an additional 10 percent reduction of overall and general flag officers throughout the DoD in conjunction with a realignment of the Unified Command Plan,” Hegseth explained.

“It’s going to be done carefully, but it’s going to be done expeditiously. We confront a complex and evolving threat environment, we cannot afford to wait. We’ve got to be lean and mean, and in this case it means general officer reductions.”

Congress is currently tasked with setting the numbers of generals and officers allowed in the U.S. Military. The total number of active-duty general or flag officers is capped at 219 for the Army, 150 for the Navy, 171 for the Air Force, 64 for the Marine Corps and 21 for the Space Force.


TOPICS: Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: foxnewsweekendhost; hegesth; military; trendingpolitics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 05/06/2025 9:42:54 AM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Grammatically is should be “Fewer Generals...”


2 posted on 05/06/2025 9:44:13 AM PDT by HonorInPa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

I expect most of this could be done by attrition: anybody with stars on his shoulders has been in long enough to retire. Such retirements could be encouraged ...


3 posted on 05/06/2025 9:45:49 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

He is right. Too many people at the top. The herd needs to be thinned out.


4 posted on 05/06/2025 9:46:17 AM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

5 posted on 05/06/2025 9:52:51 AM PDT by Signalman (When your enemy is digging himself a hole, don't take away his shovel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

And in the process, he’ll get rid of the woke, lesser qualified non-warfighting riff-raff


6 posted on 05/06/2025 9:56:22 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Trump has all the right enemies, DeSantis has all the wrong friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

He’s a young whipper-snapper turning off all the old men. Kinda reminds me of Big Balls.

The enlisted ranks should be thinned out of all NCO’s with more than 20 years.


7 posted on 05/06/2025 9:57:05 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Historic! Massive! Maybe a reduction of 10 out of 44. Oh how breathtaking.

But the article must be using some DEI math. Look at the ratios mentioned for now and ww2. Use those numbers to calculate the ratios. Not even close.

Who is responsible for such garbage writing? But! It’s historic! Massive! Just click here and get a freeper to post it.


8 posted on 05/06/2025 10:01:37 AM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

9 posted on 05/06/2025 10:04:25 AM PDT by z3n (Kakistocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HonorInPa

LOL that was my first reaction as well.


10 posted on 05/06/2025 10:04:29 AM PDT by Blueflag (To not carry is to choose to be defenseless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Has the esteemed and all-powerful Judge Boasberg given him the okay on this?


11 posted on 05/06/2025 10:14:31 AM PDT by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; NorthMountain

Politics has been at the forefront of promotions for a long while and we need to be careful to make sure its the more difficult elements which are encouraged to find a quiet existence elsewhere.

One of the problems with the Chinese military is that they have swarms of higher level officers almost all of which have their positions due to political placement with very few actually having any appropriate training or ability. This recently showed how fragile their military is despite the number of generals when they had to stop an exercise because the only two command officers that were capable of functioning within their roles were in custody and there were significant concerns related to friendly fire and possibly starting a war prematurely.

They only have a little puddle on their doorstep to worry about and no nearby land based army of any significance threatening them. Imagine what will happen if political appointees are involved in our complicated global operation.


12 posted on 05/06/2025 10:14:56 AM PDT by gnarledmaw (If you dont like my sense of humor, please let me know so I can laugh at you too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain
I expect most of this could be done by attrition...

It could be done that way, but there is a very limited time available to do meaningful reforms to the US Military before the next big conflict hits us.

I do not believe there is enough time left to get done all of what is needed. We may just barely squeak by if we are lucky.

13 posted on 05/06/2025 10:23:48 AM PDT by flamberge (Everybody's gonna hate it when we all play by the same "rules".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
And in the process, he’ll get rid of the woke, lesser qualified non-warfighting riff-raff.

This!

14 posted on 05/06/2025 10:28:36 AM PDT by flamberge (Everybody's gonna hate it when we all play by the same "rules".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

You don’t know very much about uniform wear and regulations.


15 posted on 05/06/2025 10:31:01 AM PDT by TheGunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HonorInPa
Grammatically is should be “Fewer Generals...”

Thank you.

16 posted on 05/06/2025 10:33:51 AM PDT by Mr.Unique (My boss wants me to sign up for a 401K. No way I'm running that far! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
This is SO overdo! The General ranks are terminally infected with the DEI/WOKE virus.

That is the only way they reached that high level—starting under Obama.

17 posted on 05/06/2025 10:34:32 AM PDT by volare737 (Diversity is something to be overcome, not celebrated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced Monday that the U.S. Military will soon be undergoing a massive reduction in the number of general officers across all branches.

Finally.

18 posted on 05/06/2025 10:48:08 AM PDT by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheGunny

Please enlighten me.


19 posted on 05/06/2025 10:55:17 AM PDT by Signalman (When your enemy is digging himself a hole, don't take away his shovel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: flamberge

Incompetent General: “General Halftrack, reporting as ordered!”

Hegseth: “Close the door, please.”

[Door is closed]

Hegseth: “We can do this the easy way or the hard way. Easy way is I have your request for retirement on my desk at 0500 tomorrow. It will be approved. We don’t even need to talk about the hard way ...”

Incompetent General: [1000 yd stare ...]

Hegseth: “Dismissed”


20 posted on 05/06/2025 10:59:11 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson