Posted on 04/14/2025 9:51:24 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Metro First pics of teen shot dead in NYC love triangle murder-suicide revealed By Jorge Fitz-Gibbon Published April 13, 2025, 5:27 p.m. ET
205 Comments The teen allegedly shot dead by his girlfriend’s jealous ex was 17 — as the first images of the youngster were revealed Sunday.
Neo Secaira left work early on Saturday to pick up his 19-year-old girlfriend in Bayside on Saturday night, only to walk into a bloody murder-suicide that left him and US Marine Frank Liu, 28, dead while their mutual love interest looked on in horror, police and sources told The Post.
Photos posted on Secaira’s social media accounts show a smiling youngster with a crop of curly hair, while another pic shows the smiling teen leaning up against a Big Apple storefront.
“At 7:50 this morning, a woman rings my bell,” the slain teen’s distraught mom, Yolanda Secaira, said Sunday. “She asked me, she said, ‘Your son has curly hair?’ I said, ‘Yes.’ She said my son killed your son. I said, ‘What? Your son killed my son?’ She said yes.”
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
And, as is usually the case, the cheating woman remains.
Why do you assume she was ‘cheating’? Couples break up and find new partners all the time. All the article says is that the female ‘had a change of heart’.
That’s why committing adultery is a very bad idea.
Neo-I guess he wasn’t The One.
Golf clap
It doesn’t appear that Liu and the woman were married.
One of my former boss’s explained how he got divorced. He was 500 miles from home walking arm in arm with his paramour on the board walk in Atlantic city. He rounded the corner and colided with his brother in law.
If they weren’t married it’s not adultery. Still wrong but not adultery.
What is ‘wrong’ with it? Are you still with everyone you dated when you were young?
From the article, it simply seems that the couple broke up, the girl moved on, but the boy couldn’t let it go. His father even said he was having emotional issues.
It’s wrong if you’re still in a relationship with someone because you don’t have the guys to break up.
In my case I have only slept with one woman and that’s after we got married.
Adultery is a term with a legal definition. “ voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and a person who is not his or her spouse.” (Oxford dictionary)
Sine they weren’t married they cannot commit adultery. The correct term for unmarried people is formication. Which is still morally wrong.
Well, there’s nothing in the story indicating that any of these young people were having sex with each other, or that the female ‘didn’t have the guts’ to break up. You’re assuming all of that.
And there are lots of stories of one person in a relationship being unable to cope with the relationship ending.
Why fornication (sexual relationship) between unmarried people is morally wrong? Sex outside of the marriage is wrong? You are certainly in a minority. Tiny, tiny minority….statistically nonexistent minority.
Why fornication (sexual relationship) between unmarried people is morally wrong? Sex outside of the marriage is wrong? You are certainly in a minority. Tiny, tiny minority….statistically nonexistent minority.
Truth is not determined by what a majority thinks.
The reality is that the sexual revolution has brought lots of misery to many people, including many children.
Yep, fornication and adultery are both inimical to a thriving society.
I think the ‘morality’ of sex outside of legal marriage depends entirely on the individuals and their situation.
Sorry, my position is biblically correct.
And unfortunately all too many agree with you.
Anyone can become legally married.
Do you recognize legal marriage, or the marriages of people who believe differently than you do in terms of religion?
Sometimes people make their own vows, ALL on their own; and entirely apart from Government AND any religion.
You have no idea what’s going on between those couples.
I believe in marriage between 1 man and 1 woman, divorce without remarriage except in limited cases, and no sex outside of marriage.
I do not care about the religions or lack thereof of the parties involved, but I do believe that whatever the way in which “the two become one,” the fact of this ought to be public to avoid giving a bad example.
The purpose of marriage is to form a family: to generate children and to provide the best situation in which to raise those children. Therefore, society has an interest in regulating (to whatever extent) marriage.
The above would be, imo, the ideal. I realize our society is currently not in an ideal state; however, I think that some of the ills currently besetting our society show that deviating from the ideal set forth above is harmful to children and to society.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.