Posted on 04/11/2025 4:19:14 AM PDT by MtnClimber
An ongoing national legal dispute regarding vaccinations of children with COVID-19 shots concerns whether school officials are immune from traditional legal claims.
An ongoing national legal dispute regarding vaccinations of children with COVID-19 shots concerns whether school officials are immune from traditional legal claims -- particularly, battery -- when administering Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) shots without parental consent. North Carolina’s Supreme Court recently ruled in favor of parents for violating their informed consent rights in violation of a state statute. Still, even that court denied common law state claims for battery -- the physical touching of another against their will. The mainstream media has gaslit parents, claiming that public schools cannot legally force-vaccinate their children. But unless the child suffers serious bodily injury or death, they most certainly can under current rulings.
I represented the Politella family before the U.S. Supreme Court, which on February 24 declined to hear our Petition for Writ of Certiorari challenging a Vermont Supreme Court ruling that my clients, whose six-year-old son was vaccinated with a COVID-19 shot despite their clear wishes that he not be, had no right to sue for common law battery. Vermont’s Supreme Court decided that my clients’ rights are eclipsed by the federal Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, which provides legal immunity to pharmaceutical companies and those administering shots related to these experimental vaccines. The Act allows a federal administrative remedy only in the event the shot is 1) administered “willfully,” and 2) causes “death or serious bodily injury.”
In the absence of the PREP Act, parents could sue for traditional damages if their child is given medical treatments without their consent. The Vermont Court did not consider constitutional liberties to parental control or bodily integrity. This led to claims that the court’s ruling would permit forced jabs
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
No one should be force-jabbed with a serum that Congress exempted itself and other Agencies ( Post Office) from taking
It was both. I just happen to remember that the first polio vaccine was a shot, the Salk vaccine. Then the Sabin vaccine came along which was a drop of liquid on a sugar cube when I took that one.
9YearLurker wrote: “If they are too dangerous to produce without unprecedent shielding from liability. Yep.”
What is dangerous is the failure to produce vaccines that save millions of lives each year. How many deaths were caused by small pox which has been eliminated by the very vaccines you would eliminate.
one guy in new jersey wrote: “gaslight”
No, the gaslighters are those who would do away with vaccines which save millions of lives each year.
Spare me. But I know you’re a longtime paid shill here.
Absolutely disgusting.
No! They can’t pump our children full of that crap.
Idaho is doing the right thing. Might be the first state to do this:
“The ‘Idaho Medical Freedom Act,’ primarily Senate Bill 1210, bans state, local, and private entities in Idaho from requiring medical interventions, such as vaccinations or treatments... “ Includes public and private schools.
The FDA stated outright before they approved it for children that they DID NOT KNOW WHETHER IT WAS SAFE OR EFFECTIVE. People think that if the FDA approves something it means it’s safe. It doesn’t; it only means that the death of your child is a risk they are willing to take.
At this point we know that it is neither safe nor effective. At this point anybody who still pushes it should be charged with manslaughter.
propagandize
By whom? They still haven't released all the 'undone' testing that wasn't done due to an Emergency Use Authorization being issued by the feds. That worked so well Big Pharma was able to recover a lot of development costs of Remdesivir, a re-re-purposed drug that failed at everything except killing human victims having CoVID symptoms based on a faulty PCR test.
Fast forward to today, and we now have an anti-viral, anti-bacterial, and anti-parasite drug that seems to work for people not medically-trained to deal with CoVID as well. (With reports of cancer remission, one of Big Med's major money-makers.)
And when you ask your HMO doctor about your high blood pressure and they immediately put you on a lifetime of blood pressure med prescriptions, you wonder, like I did, why the drug not prescribed seems to be the only one that works (there are others). When I pointed that out, they sent me to a shrink, where the first question asked was 'do you want to kill yourself?' in a conversation about reducing Earth's human population. I feel lucky getting out alive from that visit.
If I were a student in a school that was attempting to force vaxx me, I would be homeward bound, truancy be damned.
9YearLurker wrote: “Spare me. But I know you’re a longtime paid shill here.”
Why not prove I’m a paid shill?
A simple search will prove the vaccines have been fully approved.
Travelling has to require vaccines. No way around that. That’s why I don’t travel very much. I just don’t have much trust with today’s pharma, and there’s too much disease coming in from foreign countries. Big pharma has become a racket, along with the WHO. Not what it used to be at all.
“Fully approved”. You’re only reading what you want to read, and/or you trust whatever you watch on the View. In any case, it was “approved” by a bunch of quacks. A “simple search” will prove otherwise. One of the same quacks who approved this EXPIRAMENTAL vaccine got pardoned didn’t he? Pardoned for what? You have to commit a crime in order to be pardoned. That’s what it was intended for, someone accused of a crime.
Omnivore-Dan wrote: ““Fully approved”. You’re only reading what you want to read, and/or you trust whatever you watch on the View. In any case, it was “approved” by a bunch of quacks.”
The quacks are those pushing the anti-vaccine narrative. It’s clear that you only read the things that reinforce your pre-conceived bias against vaccines. Broaden your reading and you’ll discover that vaccines are one of the most important inventions in history responsible for saving millions of lives.
Well, I guess I only read what I want to read too. THIS is directly from FDA website, “August 22, 2024
Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved and granted emergency use authorization (EUA) for updated mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (2024-2025 formula) to include a monovalent (single) component that corresponds to the Omicron variant KP.2 strain of SARS-CoV-2. “
I clearly read three little words EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION (EUA).
Not to be picky but why did you blatantly ignore the EUA statement that follows your”fully approved” claim?
I t would appear these vaccines are both approved (12 and over) and also have a EUA (6 months through 11 years) depending upon the age of the individual.
“The updated mRNA COVID-19 vaccines include Comirnaty and Spikevax, both of which are approved for individuals 12 years of age and older, and the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, both of which are authorized for emergency use for individuals 6 months through 11 years of age.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.