Posted on 03/30/2025 9:56:54 AM PDT by Red Badger
Hong Wang, an associate professor at NYU’s Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, presenting her work on the Kakeya conjecture on March 10, 2025. Credit: David Song/NYU.
==================================================================
Professors from NYU and the University of British Columbia have resolved the Kakeya set conjecture in three dimensions.
Mathematicians from New York University and the University of British Columbia have resolved a long-standing geometric problem known as the Kakeya conjecture in three dimensions. This conjecture explores the minimal space required for a needle, or line segment, to point in every direction within a given space.
The idea originates from a 1917 question posed by Japanese mathematician Sōichi Kakeya: What is the smallest area in the plane where a needle can be rotated 180 degrees? The regions that allow such movement are called Kakeya needle sets.
Hong Wang, an associate professor at NYU’s Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, and Joshua Zahl, an associate professor in UBC’s Department of Mathematics, in an article recently posted to the preprint server arXiv, which hosts research before it is peer-reviewed and published in a journal, have shown that Kakeya sets, which are closely related to Kakeya needle sets, cannot be “too small”—namely, while it is possible for these sets to have zero three-dimensional volume, they must nonetheless be three-dimensional.
“There has been some spectacular progress in geometric measure theory: Hong Wang and Joshua Zahl have just released a preprint that resolves the three-dimensional case of the infamous Kakeya set conjecture!” wrote UCLA mathematics professor Terence Tao, who won the 2006 Fields Medal, which is awarded every four years to a mathematician under the age of 40.
Recognition from the Mathematical Community
“It stands as one of the top mathematical achievements of the 21st century,” says Eyal Lubetzky, the chair of the Mathematics department at the Courant Institute.
“This is a wonderful piece of mathematics,” adds Courant Institute Professor Guido De Philippis. “The latest work follows years of progress that has enhanced our understanding of a complicated geometry and brings it to a new level. I am expecting that their ideas will lead to a series of exciting breakthroughs in the coming years!”
“This is a problem that many of the world’s greatest mathematicians have worked on, and for good reason—in addition to having the appeal of being relatively simple to state yet extremely deep, it is connected to many other major problems in harmonic analysis and geometric measure theory,” says Pablo Shmerkin, a professor of mathematics at UBC. “While building on recent advances in the area, this resolution combines many new insights together with remarkable technical mastery. For example, the authors were able to find a statement about tube intersections that is both more general than the Kakeya conjecture and easier to tackle with a powerful approach known as induction on scales.”
Broader Impacts Across Fields
Proving the Kakeya conjecture requires a fine understanding of the structure of the interaction of tubes in Euclidean—three-dimensional—space.
“This result is not only a major breakthrough in geometric measure theory, but it also opens up a series of exciting developments in harmonic analysis, number theory, and applications in computer science and cryptography,” adds De Philippis. “Indeed in several problems in these fields, relevant information can be decomposed into wave packets—regions of space where electromagnetic or other types of waves are located—which are largely concentrated on ‘tiny tubes.’ Understanding the intersection of these tubes is fundamental in understanding how these packets of information interact one with the other.”
Reference:
“Volume estimates for unions of convex sets, and the Kakeya set conjecture in three dimensions”
by Hong Wang and Joshua Zahl, 24 February 2025, arXiv.
DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2502.17655
“Me calculate you long time.”
Of course.
The Ph.D version of counting angels dancing on the head of a pin.
I think we’ve all suspected this for a long time.
Gat a little Wang to it...................
At least the proof came with a happy ending. As proofs do.
I think sometimes people learn so much math they can’t think straight.
Obviously, since a line segment only has one dimension, it doesn’t matter how small the area is, you can still rotate it 180° on a plane just fine.
And to think I solved that without using a single equation!
And this is important because.....?
> The PhD version of counting angels dancing on the head of a pin. <
Sometimes these pure research projects yield practical results. But I struggle to find any practical results here. Looks like just another… well, what you said.
Paying PhDs to do this sort of thing might be one reason college tuition is so high.
The result here might not have value. But it least it’s not harmful. The junk research coming from education “doctors” and DEI “doctors” - that stuff is harmful.
Why not a sphere as defining?
Where’s the haystack?
This conjecture explores the minimal space required for a needle, or line segment, to point in every direction within a given space.
= = =
So, maybe a needle, or line segment is minimal length of two points long.
Sounds like it needs 2 points cubed space.
Maybe with pi in there somewhere. Probably is a sphere, not a cube.
That has only taken me over seven decades to solve.
Looking at her blackboard, clearly the answer is approximately one.
If it doesn’t have a practical application, it’s just useless knowledge.
have you considered publishing?
Then we can all say "we knew him when he was just a Freeper"!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.