Posted on 03/23/2025 11:23:41 PM PDT by Morgana
This month — March 30th — will mark 20 years since Terri Schindler Schiavo was cruelly killed, deprived of food and water for 13 days until she finally succumbed to dehydration and starvation. It was one of the most controversial bioethics issues to arise since Roe v. Wade, in what many deemed a victory for supposed “medical choice.” Now, two decades later, a pair of bioethicists is revisiting Terri’s death, and argued that while they believe killing her was the right decision, it also ended up leading to the fall of Roe v. Wade in 2022.
The Hastings Center is a bioethics research institute in New York, and on its blog, Arthur Caplan and Dominic Sisti made the outlandish claim about Schiavo. And while the Hastings Center claims to be non-partisan, Caplan, at least, is certainly biased on this issue. He has argued that EMTALA requires hospitals to commit abortions, has called for Catholic hospitals to be defunded while Planned Parenthood receives taxpayer dollars, and believes children with disabilities should be denied organ transplants.
In their op-ed, Caplan and Sisti play fast and loose with the facts surrounding Terri’s death, as well as her condition.
While she needed to be fed through a tube, she could breathe without assistance, was not sick or dying, and had no condition that would lead to her imminent death. Terri was severely disabled, but numerous doctors said there was the possibility of improvement, particularly with access to therapy.
Fighting for death
She had been receiving rehabilitative services at first, which led her to be able to speak a few words, but her husband, Michael Schiavo, stopped providing those services after 1991. Though Terri had been predicted to live a normal life span, Schiavo eventually met and moved in with another woman and fathered children with her, only then ‘remembering’ that Terri said she wouldn’t have wanted to live with such a disability.
Despite her parents’ objections and willingness to care for her themselves, Schiavo fought to have his wife slowly and torturously killed — and he didn’t bother to mandate that she receive any comfort care whatsoever.
As her brother, Bobby Schindler, has recounted:
These are the hard facts my family and I will have to live with for the rest of my life: After almost two weeks without food or water, my sister’s lips were horribly cracked, to the point where they were blistering. Her skin became jaundiced with areas that turned different shades of blue. Her skin became markedly dehydrated from the lack of water. Terri’s breathing became rapid and uncontrollable, as if she was outside sprinting.
Her moaning, at times, was raucous, which indicated to us the insufferable pain she was experiencing.
Terri’s face became skeletal, with blood pooling in her deeply sunken eyes and her teeth protruding forward. Even as I write this, I can never properly describe the nightmare of having to watch my sister have to die this way.
What will be forever seared in my memory is the look of utter horror on my sister’s face when my family visited her just after she died.
Instead of acknowledging how horrific her death at the hands of her husband was, Caplan and Sisti lionize him as the person “who knew her best” and had the “authority” to fight for her “values.” (More facts about Terri’s life, and cruel death, can be read here.)
Schiavo’s death ’emboldened’ the pro-life movement
Yet for Caplan and Sisti, Terri’s death is notable today solely because, they claim, it “emboldened” the pro-life movement, which in turn, led to the fall of Roe in the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision.
In retrospect, Schiavo launched a new, emboldened prolife movement, one that would eventually lead to conservative rule in state houses across the U.S. and the election, twice, of Donald Trump.
The seeding of a new ultraconservative judiciary would support a strategic assault on medical privacy that would eventually lead to the end of legal abortion protection in Dobbs.
Schiavo established a dangerous precedent in which politicians determined medical care, not patients and not their spouses.
Of course, the pro-life movement launched decades before 2005; the National Right to Life Committee, for example, was formed in 1967, while the term “pro-life” had been used since Roe was instituted in 1973.
The pair furthermore talk about the need to “fight to honor Terri’s values in death,” which is even more grotesque, considering her death was the result of the removal of nutrition and hydration from a vulnerable person with disabilities — not removing someone from life support who was artificially being kept alive.
Furthermore, the notion of a more powerful person taking the life of a more vulnerable human being is entirely reminiscent of abortion. No one should have the right to take the life of another person, regardless of the circumstances.
bkmk
Under protest.
I believe there are special places in hell for the people who would do the killing of Terri and try to justify it afterwards. I can’t condemn them to that (it’s above my pay grade) I can’t condemn them to it. I can only hope I’m right.
Judge Greer’s order said Terri was to not receive food nor water by any means. In other words, a death sentence. So if a death sentence was proper, then it should have been humanely carried out. It wasn’t.
Just my opinion, but it’s fairly obvious that the Democrats paid the liberal wing of the Supreme Court a visit in 2022 to say we need Roe vs Wade reversed. They probably said, “It will help us in the 2022 and 2024 elections if abortion is once again an issue.”
Jeb is the evil bastard who allowed this to happen
Yeah, and I can’t forget about the method by which she was killed. Depriving her of something as basic as water for two weeks is not just “pulling the plug”, like the Left tried to portray it as. Water is not artificial life support, the protestors said. And why was the Left so passionately in favor of her slow execution by dehydration? Because it reinforced their political belief that individuals are expendable.
What really bothered me was the way they killed her.
I would not kill any animal that way.
Drugs are cheap. So is water.
Death by deprivation is not very comfortable!
True. Regards
For your collections........
How is that?
“Let’s Review the Facts About Terri Schiavo,” Pro-Life Leader Urges
MichNews.com ^ | Feb 28, 2005 | US Newswire via NewsCom
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1353813/posts
Activist Judge Greer plays “God” as arbiter of life and death
MichNews.com ^ | Mar 1, 2005 | Barbara Kralis
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1353803/posts
A SOLUTION FOR TERRI SCHIAVO: MAKE HER A PART OF A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION
MichNews.com ^ | Mar 1, 2005 | Michael J. Gaynor
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1353800/posts
Schindler Family: Terri’s Judge ‘Afraid of the Truth’
CNSNews.com ^ | March 01, 2005 | Jeff Johnson
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1353773/posts
Last rites, cremation part of Schiavo battle (Catholic Bishop Lynch urges negotiation)
St. Petersburg Times ^ | Mar 1, 05 | WILLIAM R. LEVESQUE
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1353765/posts
Evidence of Physical Abuse Haunts Michael Schiavo
Christian Wire Service ^ | Feb 10, 2005 | Gary McCullough
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/1341036/posts?page=56#56
“blame”
He was Governor at the time. He could have exercised executive privilege.
That makes sense.
I wonder if she had a will or not, and if it did did it say she would want life support in case of a medical issue? Why was she hospitalized o begin with? I don’t remember the history of this case.
I just feel that if someone like Trump were president then, that he’d’ve gone right in with military if necessary and pulled her out of there.
This is the biggest problem I had with Bush.
This is the case that brought me to FR to begin with, in 2003. It was horrific what they did to her. The Culture of Death on full display. As I recall, the husband’s lawyer was a radical euthanasia advocate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.