Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING (not really though) Fmr. President Joe Biden did NOT sign a single pardon in his entire presidency. Everything that was signed allegedly by him was signed by Jeffrey Zients. ANYTHING and EVERYTHING signed by him should be invalid...
Twitter ^ | March 6, 2025 | Liberal Tear Creator™️ @LibTearCreator1

Posted on 03/07/2025 4:26:08 PM PST by grundle

BREAKING (not really though)

Fmr. President Joe Biden did NOT sign a single pardon in his entire presidency.

Everything that was signed allegedly by him was signed by Jeffrey Zients.

ANYTHING and EVERYTHING signed by him should be invalid and investigated by the DOJ.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: fjb; jeffreyzients; pardongate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Republican Wildcat

This reminds me of funny historical story, with extreme consequences.
The WWI started, history teaches, by killing the Austrian Duke.
But that was just the spark. There was a long list of evens leading to the WWI.

One of them is related to government officials blindly signing.

In Germany, somebody wrote a memo, very hostile to France, and let it circulated.
It turned out, signed by many high government officials, including Emperor himself.
France was very upset, and the Germans were clumsily explaining, that they all signed it without ever reading it.
This was actually one of the reasons for WWI!


41 posted on 03/07/2025 5:53:29 PM PST by AZJeep (sane )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida

Check for fingerprints


42 posted on 03/07/2025 5:57:24 PM PST by cnsmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Of course it is...

Paging Pam Bondi


43 posted on 03/07/2025 6:09:37 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tareli

If the “copies” in the official record have an autosignature instead of his physical signature then what is in the official record is fraudulent.

That video of him signing the first 3 from a stack seemed really strange to me because his handlers shooed everybody out if the room so fast and forcefully. There was a reason for that, and somebody needs to answer questions under oath about all this stuff.


44 posted on 03/07/2025 6:09:39 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: grundle

45 posted on 03/07/2025 6:11:19 PM PST by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Question, did Jeffrey also sign the Power of Attorney giving him the right to sign Joe Biden’s name to legal documents? 🤔🤔🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣


46 posted on 03/07/2025 6:17:10 PM PST by Lockbox (politicians, they all seemed like game show host to me.... Sting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Bttt.

5.56mm


47 posted on 03/07/2025 6:19:18 PM PST by M Kehoe (Thank you Jesus. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
Maybe the Trump administration is making such a show of signing things for a reason

Trump is aware of how Biden did things. Gives more creedence to the fishy stuff going on with Slo-Joe when he signs and shows stuff
48 posted on 03/07/2025 6:54:37 PM PST by BigEdLB (Adults are in charge )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Or his memory was really bad.


49 posted on 03/07/2025 7:14:56 PM PST by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Flaming Conservative

If his memory was thatbad that he thought he did the opposite of what he actually did then there was no way for him to give legal consent to anything.

When my husband signed to make me POA as his dementia got worse we had to prove to the notary public that he understood what he was doing. His brother handled it for me and explained in several ways what signing would mean and he had to specifically agree and describe what he was signing.

No way was any of this legal.


50 posted on 03/07/2025 7:27:46 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America

Pictures of the various signatures are all over the internet and they are IDENTICAL.


51 posted on 03/07/2025 8:39:08 PM PST by Jayster (Legalize Marijuana )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: grundle

“Report: Nearly All of Biden’s Official Signatures were Autopens, so Who Was Really Running the Country?”

asked and answered in 2005:

https://www.justice.gov/olc/opinion/whether-president-may-sign-bill-directing-his-signature-be-affixed-it

“Whether the President May Sign a Bill by Directing That His Signature Be Affixed to It”

The President need not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to a bill he approves and decides to sign in order for the bill to become law. Rather, the President may sign a bill within the meaning of Article I, Section 7 by directing a subordinate to affix the President’s signature to such a bill, for example by autopen.

July 7, 2005

MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE COUNSEL TO THE PRESIDENT


52 posted on 03/07/2025 8:44:41 PM PST by catnipman ((A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

his beginning of term original signature may have deteriorated over the 4 years to a scribble at the end and they were trying to hide the decline.


53 posted on 03/08/2025 8:55:43 AM PST by bdfromlv (Leavenworth hard time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: bdfromlv

They used the autoopen from the very first day he signed the executive orders. And after he signed 3 of them they aggressively shooed everybody out of the room. That was on Day One.

And in the end, what we know is that the “copies” submitted to the official record are no such thing. They could be anything.


54 posted on 03/08/2025 9:45:48 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

That isn’t the point.

The point is that he physically signed stuff on video and yet what was submitted as “copies” to the official record was autosigned. What was submitted as “copies” are proven to NOT be copies at all. They could be something totally different than what he signed.

And in fact, we know that to be true based on the conversation Mike Johnson had with Biden, where Biden was adamant that he had signed authorization to study the effects of LPG and did NOT sign an EO banning it. Yet the autosigned “copy” is a ban on LGP. Biden told Johnson that what is in the official record is NOT what he actually signed. Regardless of whether Biden can have somebody else use the autopen we have Biden’s own word that what they put his signature to is NOT what he ever agreed to sign.


55 posted on 03/08/2025 9:49:42 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

I wonder if there was any surveillance video of that conversation between Johnson and Biden.


56 posted on 03/08/2025 9:55:03 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: grundle

This must be true. At the end, Potato Joe was too out of it to sign anything. Though if I were him, I would have made the effort to sign the pardons for my family members. Even if fake Doc Jill had to hold the pen in my hand.


57 posted on 03/08/2025 10:00:25 AM PST by dennisw (💯🇺🇸 Truth is Hate to those who Hate the Truth. 🇺🇸💯)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

i recommend that you get SCOTUS to rule on the Constitutional validity of these anomalies ... i’m pretty sure that you would have standing as a citizen ...


58 posted on 03/08/2025 10:30:11 AM PST by catnipman ((A Vote For The Lesser Of Two Evils Still Counts As A Vote For Evil))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

I think the companies affected by the LNG ban should definitely sue in the state in which the ban was enforced.


59 posted on 03/08/2025 10:58:29 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

The chance of SCOTUS taking it up are practically nil, unless through an appeals process.

What we heard through all the lawsuits about Obama’s eligibility issue was that it is nobody’s business. Nobody has standing because we’re all equally screwed by the illegalities. You have to suffer particularized harm to have standing to sue, so if your only claim for standing is that you are a US citizen you will be denied standing.

It has to be somebody who has particularized harm because of the thing Biden allegedly signed, and if it could be shown that he signed in person but the “copy” is autosigned that would be important.


60 posted on 03/08/2025 11:02:26 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson