E.U. Leaders Just Announced That Europe Will Send Troops To Directly Fight Russia in Ukraine and That the Globalist Demand the U.S. Under NATO Article 5, Must Join in the Psychotic Insanity!

X.com ^ | Last edited 2:57 PM · Mar 2, 2025 | Alex Jones✓@RealAlexJones

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Trump must pull the USA out of NATO now, to stop the probable destruction of civilization!

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Alex Jones is full of it, as usual.

That's why Donald Trump and Elon Musk and General Michael Flynn and Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan, etc. talk to him regularly.

[Wallace T.]

Is there a direct quote from Prime Minister Starmer stating that he would send British Army combat units? Did President Macron make the same statement respective to French military? Until I see comments directly from these leaders, I will remain unconvinced.

[rdcbn1]

Not going to happen . The UK can’t even defend Big Ben, much less Ukraine

[E. Pluribus Unum]

I am just tired of brainless boobs who automatically sneer at Alex Jones, when Alex Jones is the reason we have the globalists on the ropes.

If that offends you, good.

[dpetty121263]

No think I am talking with a retard and sucker but never mind nobody listens to you anyway...

[EnderWiggin1970]

We need to start bombing London and Berlin and Paris and start a real war for liberation.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

I like that idea.

[Allegra]

I didn’t “sneer.” Re-read my post and stop acting like a hysterical Boston fishwife.

I’m not “offended.” I’m disgusted with your overwrought behavior.

Is it chocolate-bar time of month, maybe?

[dfwgator]

We need to start bombing London and Berlin and Paris and start a real war for liberation.

---

We’ll save Austrailia
Don’t want to hurt no Kangaroo

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Is it chocolate-bar time of month, maybe?

What a sleazy, disgusting thing to say.

[DesertRhino]

They forgot that part I think.

[Allegra]

Are you offended? Good.

[PerConPat]

I was posting what I believe would be the American reaction to a call from European NATO members to invoke Article 5, in the situation I described.

Who are the “they” you refer to in your post?

[higgmeister]

There’s no way Europe is going to start WWIII.

"Or so the Germans would have us believe."

Wait, isn't the third time a charm?

[dfwgator]

Once all the Germans were warlike and mean
But that couldn’t happen again
We taught them a lesson in 1918
And they’ve hardly bothered us since then

-Tom Lehrer

[No.6]

Let's make this easy.

Article 5

The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.

Article 6

For the purpose of Article 5, an armed attack on one or more of the Parties is deemed to include an armed attack:

• on the territory of any of the Parties in Europe or North America, on the Algerian Departments of France 2, on the territory of Turkey or on the Islands under the jurisdiction of any of the Parties in the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer;
• on the forces, vessels, or aircraft of any of the Parties, when in or over these territories or any other area in Europe in which occupation forces of any of the Parties were stationed on the date when the Treaty entered into force or the Mediterranean Sea or the North Atlantic area north of the Tropic of Cancer.

No part of this states or implies "when the parties of NATO go adventuring off somewhere and get killed" and no part of Ukraine meets the criteria of Article 6.

[xkaydet65]

Yet NATO nations sent troops to Afghanistan in reponse to the 9/11 attack even though Afghanistan did not actually attack the US. But each nation sending troops invoked Art V.

[radu]

Article V does not require us to join in militarily, it allows us to.

Exactly, as can be read here.

"The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognized by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area."

[DesertRhino]

They did none of the heavy lifting. They sent minimal forces and they went to relatively safe areas and did relatively safe jobs. Mostly, they wanted joint command billets for their officers.

BTW, who was the first nation to offer Bush “anything he needs” and back it up with massive assistance?
It was Putin.

[dp0622]

alex jones

ROFL!!!