Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How & Why Government, Universities, & Industry Create Domestic Labor Shortages of Scientists & High-Tech Workers
Institute for Economic Thinking ^ | Mar 28, 2017 | Eric Weinstein

Posted on 12/29/2024 1:32:19 PM PST by absalom01

As I studied the situation, it became increasingly clear that the groups purporting to speak for US scientists in Washington DC (e.g. NSF, NAS, AAU, GUIRR) actually viewed themselves as advocates for employers in a labor dispute with working scientists and were focused on undermining scientists’ economic bargaining power through labor market intervention and manipulation.

...

By 1998, it was becoming obvious that the real problems of high skilled immigration were actually rather well understood by an entire class of policy actors who were not forthcoming about the levers of policy they were using to influence policy. The NSF/NAS/GUIRR complex appeared to be feigning incompetence by issuing labor market studies that blatantly ignored wages and market dynamics and instead focused on demographics alone.

During the late 1990s I became convinced that in order to orchestrate lower wages for scientists, there would have to have been a competent economic study done to guide the curious policy choices that had resulted in the flooded market for STEM PhDs. For this theory to be correct, the private economic study would have had to have been done studying both supply and demand so that the demand piece could later be removed, resulting in the bizarre ‘supply only’ demographic studies released to the public. Through a bit of economic detective work, I began a painstaking search of the literature and discovered just such a study immediately preceded the release of the foolish demography studies that provided the public justification for the Immigration Act of 1990. This needle was located in the haystack of documents the NSF was forced to turn over when the House investigated the NSF for faking alarms about a shortfall.

The title of this study was “The Pipeline For Scientific and Technical Personnel: Past Lessons Applied to Future Changes of Interest to Policy-Makers and Human Resource Specialists.” The study was undated and carried no author’s name. Eventually I gathered my courage to call up the National Science Foundation and demand to speak to the study’s author. After some hemming and hawing, I was put through to a voice belonging to a man I had never heard of named Myles Boylan. In our conversation, it became clear that it was produced in 1986, as predicted, immediately before the infamous and now disgraced demographic shortfall studies.

...

But, as the study makes clear, the problem being solved was not a problem of talent but one of price: scientific employers had become alarmed that they would have to pay competitive market wages to US Ph.D.s with other options. The study’s aim was not to locate talent but to weaken its ability to bargain with employers by using foreign labor to undermine the ability to negotiate for new Ph.D.s

...

American industry and Big Science convinced official Washington to put in place a series of policies that had little to do with any demographic concerns. Their aims instead were to keep American scientific employers from having to pay the full US market price of high skilled labor. They hoped to keep the US research system staffed with employees classified as “trainees,” “students,” and “post-docs” for the benefit of employers. The result would be to render the US scientific workforce more docile and pliable to authority and senior researchers by attempting to ensure this labor market sector is always flooded largely by employer-friendly visa holders who lack full rights to respond to wage signals in the US labor market.

...

I wrote this up in a study that the National Bureau of Economic Research published. Until a few weeks ago, it was available on their website. With other studies now appearing that are consonant with my conclusions and the Trump administration studying a possible revision of legislation on visas, I am grateful for INET’s encouragement and willingness to republish my study.

Download the paper


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; History
KEYWORDS: education; foreignworkers; h1b; labor; science; techbros; visas
Both of the Weinstein brothers have a tendency to dabble in conspiracy speculation, but this almost decade old piece by Eric seemed topical.

Still think it's strange that the DOGE bros decided (apparently with Trump's at least tacit agreement) that this is exactly the right time to provoke a firestorm, but at least it's not boring...

1 posted on 12/29/2024 1:32:19 PM PST by absalom01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

All the media shouting about Musk, Vivek, H1B’s and President Trump leaves me wondering what they want to distract us from.


2 posted on 12/29/2024 2:17:00 PM PST by mouse1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mouse1

just a lame attempt by the fake news media to cause a fight among conservatives, when there is no issue. Trump mentioned that he supported LEGAL immigration each and every time he has ever talked about ILLEGAL immigration.


3 posted on 12/29/2024 2:32:08 PM PST by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: absalom01
I wrote this up in a study that the National Bureau of Economic Research published. Until a few weeks ago, it was available on their website.

That sounds like a story by itself.

4 posted on 12/29/2024 3:02:20 PM PST by KarlInOhio (Now unburdened by the Biden/Harris administration that has been.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

He wrote this in 2017.


5 posted on 12/29/2024 3:05:20 PM PST by absalom01 (You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mouse1

Exactly.


6 posted on 12/29/2024 3:10:37 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: absalom01

Saving for later


7 posted on 12/29/2024 3:57:52 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson