Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drinking Sweetened Beverages Significantly Increases Cardiovascular Disease Risk, Study Suggests
SCI News ^ | December 10, 2024 | Staff

Posted on 12/20/2024 8:44:47 AM PST by Red Badger

In a new study published in the journal Frontiers in Public Health, scientists investigated the associations between intake of added sugar and various sugar-sweetened foods and beverages and risk of 7 cardiovascular diseases in 69,705 participants aged 45-83 years (47.2% female) from the Swedish Mammography Cohort and the Cohort of Swedish Men. They found that eating too much added sugar increases your risk of stroke or aneurysm, but eating a few treats is associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular diseases; meanwhile, drinking sweetened beverages raises stroke, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation risks.

Cardiovascular disease comprises various diseases of the heart and blood vessels and is currently the leading cause of death and disease burden in Europe, primarily by stroke and ischemic heart disease.

Despite diet being one of the main modifiable risk factors of many CVDs, the evidence regarding added sugar intake and CVD risk is scarce and inconclusive.

Furthermore, most studies have primarily focused on sugar-sweetened beverage consumption rather than overall added sugar intake even though sugar-sweetened beverages make up only 14% of added sugar intake in Sweden and 25% in the United States.

“The most striking finding from our study is the divergent relationship between different sources of added sugar and CVD risk,” said Suzanne Janzi, PhD candidate at Lund University.

“This surprising contrast highlights the importance of considering not just the amount of sugar consumed, but its source and context.”

To understand how sugar consumption affects CVD risk, and whether consuming different kinds of sugar changes those risks, Janzi and her colleagues collected data from two major cohort studies, the Swedish Mammography Cohort and the Cohort of Swedish Men.

These studies had diet questionnaires administered in 1997 and 2009, allowing the scientists to monitor participants’ diets over time.

Once exclusions had been made to ensure the two cohorts shared the same inclusion criteria and to remove independent risk factors for CVDs, the researchers were left with a sample of 69,705 participants.

They looked at three classes of sugar consumption — toppings like honey, treats like a pastry, or sweetened beverages like fizzy drinks — and seven CVDs: two different types of stroke, heart attacks, heart failure, aortic aneurysms, atrial fibrillation, and aortic stenosis.

The participants were monitored until they died, were diagnosed with one of the CVDs, or reached the end of the follow-up period in 2019.

During this period, 25,739 participants were diagnosed with a CVD.

The scientists then used this data to break down how the different types of sugar intake affect the risk of different CVDs.

They found that consuming sweet drinks was worse for your health than any other form of sugar: drinking more sweetened drinks significantly increased the risk of ischemic stroke, heart failure, atrial fibrillation and abdominal aortic aneurysm.

“Liquid sugars, found in sweetened beverages, typically provide less satiety than solid forms — they make you feel less full — potentially leading to overconsumption,” Janzi said.

“Context also matters — treats are often enjoyed in social settings or special occasions, while sweetened beverages might be consumed more regularly.”

Different CVDs were affected differently by increased sugar intake, possibly because consuming additional sugar affected participants’ individual risk profile differently.

Increased sugar in general raised the risk of ischemic stroke and abdominal aortic aneurysm, as well as increasing the risk of heart failure in participants with a normal BMI.

However, the highest risks of a negative health outcome arose in the lowest intake category for treats. Consuming occasional treats was associated with better outcomes than no treats at all.

“This might reflect underlying dietary behaviors — individuals consuming very little sugar might have very restrictive diets or might be limiting sugar due to pre-existing health conditions,” Janzi said.

“While our observational study cannot establish causation, these findings suggest that extremely low sugar intake may not be necessary or beneficial for cardiovascular health.”

_____

Suzanne Janzi et al. 2024.

Added sugar intake and its associations with incidence of seven different cardiovascular diseases in 69,705 Swedish men and women. Frontiers in Public Health 12;

doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1452085


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Education; Food; Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 12/20/2024 8:44:47 AM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

This is news???


2 posted on 12/20/2024 8:46:51 AM PST by goodnesswins (Don’t be REALITY PHOBIC!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

Right?


3 posted on 12/20/2024 8:49:31 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to says it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“Have a Coke and a ...”


4 posted on 12/20/2024 8:51:45 AM PST by Uncle Miltie ("Israel will just have to ... kill more Christians” - FR's own "nitzy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Doesn’t your body turn everything you eat into a sweetened beverage so your body can use it ? LOL


5 posted on 12/20/2024 8:53:36 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I’m sticking with chocolate.


6 posted on 12/20/2024 8:56:17 AM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Very interesting.

"Consuming occasional treats was associated with better outcomes than no treats at all."

They didn't define "occasional."

7 posted on 12/20/2024 9:00:08 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (There are two ways to live your life: nothing is a miracle or everything is a miracle - A. Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

Quad Bypass!..................


8 posted on 12/20/2024 9:00:26 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
From the Lund University article..."But it is possible that this is an indirect relationship. That people who consume a large quantity of soft drinks have a more unhealthy lifestyle in general, and that it is therefore not the soft drinks themselves that increase the risk."

Confound it!!

9 posted on 12/20/2024 9:03:57 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (There are two ways to live your life: nothing is a miracle or everything is a miracle - A. Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Would prefer more research into the artificial garbage like HFCS and sugar substitutes polluting our food supply.


10 posted on 12/20/2024 9:07:23 AM PST by HonkyTonkMan ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Bkmk


11 posted on 12/20/2024 9:07:28 AM PST by sauropod ("You didn't take a country. You only won a football game!" - Dan Dakich Ne supra crepidam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HonkyTonkMan

https://www.princeton.edu/news/2010/03/22/sweet-problem-princeton-researchers-find-high-fructose-corn-syrup-prompts


12 posted on 12/20/2024 9:08:10 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

“These studies had diet questionnaires administered in 1997 and 2009, allowing the scientists to monitor participants’ diets over time.”

I’m certain that sugar is bad for us. But this study is worthless. TWO diet questionnaires a dozen years apart, then nothing for the last 15 years? Garbage!


13 posted on 12/20/2024 9:14:04 AM PST by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Thank you, Red Badger. Fat Rats, just like Congress!

On a serious note, it's troubling that so many products children typically eat have HFCS: crackers, juice, cereal, ketchup. The current generation will be the first one to have this stuff in their food from an early age. Prior generations had access to a non-synthetic food supply.

14 posted on 12/20/2024 9:17:25 AM PST by HonkyTonkMan ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

In a society that is now female based, health articles are a constant and a routine part of daily concerns and things to worry about.


15 posted on 12/20/2024 9:19:04 AM PST by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Also, anyone who breathes air will die.


16 posted on 12/20/2024 9:27:00 AM PST by Zack Attack (✔)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Someone is looking for some grant money. LOL. As always, these articles simply assume that people are going to over-consume, as if they see a sixpack of Coke and drink the whole thing in one sitting.


17 posted on 12/20/2024 9:36:09 AM PST by Opinionated Blowhard (When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard
...as if they see a sixpack of Coke and drink the whole thing in one sitting.

Some do. I know..................

18 posted on 12/20/2024 9:38:14 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Zack Attack
Also, anyone who breathes air will die.

Everyone talks about breathing, but nobody’s doing anything about it.

19 posted on 12/20/2024 9:43:10 AM PST by Sirius Lee ("Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

These studies by ‘scientists’ need to be race aware because it’s easy to get grant money by proving negative health correlations with any habit or choice a majority of blacks engage in...


20 posted on 12/20/2024 9:58:36 AM PST by GOPJ (https://files.catbox.moe/rwi6a2.jpeg //files.catbox.moe/14hch9.jpg <img src="[image url]">)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson