Skip to comments.
Trump Team Signs Agreement to Allow F.B.I. Background Checks for Nominees
The New York Times ^
| Dec. 3, 2024Updated 6:21 p.m. ET
| Maggie Haberman, Charlie Savage and Jonathan Swan
Posted on 12/03/2024 4:21:40 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
To: E. Pluribus Unum
3
posted on
12/03/2024 4:22:52 PM PST
by
dadfly
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Could be a way to catch them, though, having already vetted separately.
4
posted on
12/03/2024 4:24:17 PM PST
by
Fester Chugabrew
(In a world of parrots and lemmings, be a watchdog.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
i’m sure fagg wray will be fair and impartial
To: E. Pluribus Unum
So he’s going to use today’s FBI to check on his nominees? Big mistake.
6
posted on
12/03/2024 4:25:48 PM PST
by
SkyDancer
( ~ Am Yisrael Chai ~)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
People still don’t trust Trump. That’s a mystery
7
posted on
12/03/2024 4:26:47 PM PST
by
stanne
To: dadfly
It may be a good way to flush out undesirable fbi agents.
To: dadfly
It may be a good way to flush out undesirable fbi agents.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
How did Valerie Jarrett ever pass the FBI check?
10
posted on
12/03/2024 4:28:43 PM PST
by
Zathras
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Hopefully the agreement has some method for auditing materials collected.
11
posted on
12/03/2024 4:29:11 PM PST
by
glorgau
To: E. Pluribus Unum
President Trump this not good.
VERY BAD !!! THEY CAN NOT BE TRUSTED AT ALL !!!
12
posted on
12/03/2024 4:29:46 PM PST
by
mabarker1
( (Congress- the opposite of PROGRESS!!! A fraud, a hypocrite, a liar. I'm a member of Congress!!!)
To: 1malumprohibitum
Mistake?? Please....I'm sure the FBI already has all they need to make a decision. These candidates are not new to the political/social world.
The agreement is just part of the process. No big deal in the real world.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Don’t give your enemies anything.
14
posted on
12/03/2024 4:37:14 PM PST
by
popdonnelly
(All the enormous crimes in history have been committed by governments.)
To: SkyDancer
It’s no coincidence that Trump’s nominees are making the rounds with Repub senators right now. So, it either means they gave nominees an ultimatum - background checks or a likely ‘no’ vote on confirmation - or - some are ‘no’ votes and Trump is removing this excuse.
To: Fester Chugabrew
No way should he allow the corrupt FBI to vet
Anyone.
16
posted on
12/03/2024 4:41:02 PM PST
by
Ronald77
To: Zathras
Was she ever in a position that required a back ground check such as a director of an agency. She was an advisor. They should, but are checks done on advisors ?
I don’t think back ground checks are done on congress either.
17
posted on
12/03/2024 4:42:49 PM PST
by
HollyB
To: stanne
I gave up on that.
Probably sounded like a concern troll during the election :)
“omg he said that?!? he’s done!!”
“oh no, he did what?!?! he’s done!!”
Etc :)
18
posted on
12/03/2024 4:44:22 PM PST
by
dp0622
(Tried a coup, a fake tax story, tramp slander, Russia nonsense, impeachment and a virus. They lost.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
To: E. Pluribus Unum
What could possibly go wrong???
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson