Skip to comments.
Why Republicans Might Oppose Trump’s Push to Undo Biden’s Triumphs
The New York Times ^
| Dec. 3, 2024, 9:48 a.m. ET
| Zolan Kanno-Youngs and Madeleine Ngo
Posted on 12/03/2024 12:10:30 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
President-elect Donald J. Trump has promised to unravel President Biden’s major legislation when he takes office next month, but Mr. Biden is hoping to salvage his most prized policies with help from an unlikely source: Republicans.
With just weeks left in office, Mr. Biden and his aides have emphasized that his signature economic legislation, the Inflation Reduction Act, overwhelmingly benefits Republican districts, in the hopes that Mr. Trump would face blowback from his own party if he repealed it.
The administration is also racing to award
hundreds of millions of dollars in grants and finalize environmental regulations to lock in Mr. Biden’s economic agenda, including ramping up domestic manufacturing of clean energy products and semiconductors.
“They are not going to want to undermine those jobs and those businesses that we know for the first time are really strong in so many districts around the country that have been left behind under trickle-down policies,” Lael Brainard, Mr. Biden’s national economic adviser, said in an interview.
Roughly 80 percent of new clean energy manufacturing investments announced since the Inflation Reduction Act passed in 2022 have flowed to Republican congressional districts, according to data from Atlas Public Policy, a research firm.
Mr. Trump and his allies have attacked the legislation, which provides at least $390 billion over 10 years in tax breaks, grants and subsidies for wind and solar power, electric vehicle battery production and other clean energy projects.
Mr. Trump, who has called global warming a “scam,” wants to claw back money included in the law, which some estimates have found could cost as much as $1.2 trillion over 10 years.
“We will rescind all unspent funds under the misnamed Inflation Reduction Act,” Mr. Trump said in September.
Mr. Trump has also attacked the CHIPS and Science...
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Humor
KEYWORDS: assistantdemocrats; corruptlosers; enemieslist; enemyjournalists; fakenews; gopestablishment; madeleinengo; newyorkslimes; nytsedition; rinos; rinosedition; tds; uniparty; zolankannoyoungs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
“Triumphs?”
Like the blanket pardon of Humper?
2
posted on
12/03/2024 12:11:16 PM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████ ████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Offhand, I can’t think of any.........
3
posted on
12/03/2024 12:15:47 PM PST
by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
4
posted on
12/03/2024 12:16:41 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
"Roughly 80 percent of new clean energy manufacturing investments announced since the Inflation Reduction Act passed in 2022 have flowed to Republican congressional districts"I find that VERY hard to believe. That is pure BS.
"Mr. Trump and his allies have attacked the legislation, which provides at least $390 billion over 10 years in tax breaks, grants and subsidies for wind and solar power, electric vehicle battery production and other clean energy projects."
Let the damn green stuff stand on its own economic merits. It if made economic sense, the market would choose it and we would not need decades (maybe centuries) of federal life support.
5
posted on
12/03/2024 12:17:43 PM PST
by
ProtectOurFreedom
(Republicans are the party that says ‘Government doesn’t work.’ Then they get elected and prove it.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The grifting GOP bankrupted our country. They are not going to un-bankrupt it.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
No worries nyt. Swamp rinos will be tossing road blocks in any case. Can’t let outsiders disrupt the gravy trains.
7
posted on
12/03/2024 12:18:46 PM PST
by
rktman
(Destroy America from within ? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this💩? 🚫💉! 🇮🇱👍!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
US voters do you want these boondoggles or do you want lower fuel/food/housing costs?
8
posted on
12/03/2024 12:19:01 PM PST
by
MNJohnnie
(Don't blame me, my congressman is MTG!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Way too many words in this piece.
My more concise version would be:
Why? $!
9
posted on
12/03/2024 12:20:16 PM PST
by
Manic_Episode
(Harpazo imminent. Each post may be my last. It's been real =)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
LOL, like a scantily clad woman in a redlight district, the NYTimes is trying to openly solicit RINOs. “Hey big boy, you wanna great some press from the NYTimes and the liberal media, then all you have to do is oppose Trump.”
10
posted on
12/03/2024 12:22:00 PM PST
by
Obadiah
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Republicans in those districts will work for low wages while the DEMOCRAT owners will get rich. It appears it IS time for a revolution and permanent housecleaning.
11
posted on
12/03/2024 12:23:08 PM PST
by
MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
(Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
So, we are going back from climate change to global warming?
If every government on earth confiscated every penny beyond survival from every person and spent it all on climate, they could not affect the global temperature by 1°, or the ocean levels by an inch.
12
posted on
12/03/2024 12:25:27 PM PST
by
JimRed
(TERM LIMITS, NOW! Finish the damned WALL! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH! )
To: E. Pluribus Unum
With triumph’s that resemble defeats, who needs triumphs?
To: ProtectOurFreedom
Let the damn green stuff stand on its own economic merits. It if made economic sense, the market would choose it and we would not need decades (maybe centuries) of federal life support.Lets also drop the fossil fuel subsidies and really see the results.
14
posted on
12/03/2024 12:26:48 PM PST
by
Bubba Ho-Tep
("The rat always knows when he's in with weasels."--Tom Waits)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
It’s gotta be so hard working for the NYT and having to dream up fantasy-world stories every day.
15
posted on
12/03/2024 12:35:51 PM PST
by
alancarp
(George Orwell was an optimist.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
This is a poorly written, poorly research push article.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I think that that should read “Why Rat Party Headquarters Hopes Republicans Will Block Trump’s Plans”
To: Eli Kopter
Look at the authors.My guess is that English isn’t their native tongue.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The keywords say it all and that’s just the beginning:
gopestablishment; rinos; tds; uniparty
19
posted on
12/03/2024 12:48:12 PM PST
by
quantim
(Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Why Republicans Might Oppose Trump’s Push to Undo Biden’s TriumphsOn going off the deep end, aka: out of control propagandic punditry.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson