And the democRAT voters are either too stupid to see the corruption or they really don’t care about their side being corrupt. They hysterically claim Trump will use lawfare against his opposition when it is their side that actually did it. And the ‘RATs fail to see the irony.
I hope that someone is scouting out a good location for Trump’s position on Mount Rushmore and is beginning to file the preliminary environmental impact statement for the construction.
“Donald Trump just buried lawfare.”
All it takes is to be a billionaire with a very thick skin, a huge stubborn streak, and almost superhuman stamina. Given those things, anyone can beat lawfare. Easy peasy.
Then tried to kill him.
I fear that the lesson the other side will learn is that the best way to get rid of an opponent is not lawfare but assassination, and they will get better at whacking both opponents and those supporters who lose their usefulness (aka Arkanciding).
NOte the word REPUBLIC is being used more often. It was a democracy when the democrats were in charge.
What is a republic?
We got lucky. A man of lesser means would not have withstood the onslaught. Pray for Trump. Pray for the Republic. The war NEVER ends.
Lawfare? Criminality
Sorry, but I'm not going to hold my breath.
“Donald Trump just buried lawfare”
What a load. Who does this guy think will be in power after 2028? It certainly won’t be Donald Trump.
The Dems will come screaming back with a vengeance! Basically “normal” AMerica has got 4 years to get it’s ducks in a row and to GET OUT before the Dems return to close the gates and confiscate wealth.
I think his greatest gift to us has been his courage.
“Courage is the foundation of all the other virtues.”
President Trump, please protect the USA from political prosecution of conservatives such as yourself, Steve Bannon, Rudolf Gulianni and others! Prosecute all those involved in these prosecutions, from the prosecutors themselves, the investigators’, the staff, etc. They all belong in Jail for a long time!
The Don is a man for all seasons.
Sure. I will wager that the lawsuits are already being prepared now to flood the courts on day 1. California has already said it’s going to do that, and it was recruiting other dem states to do the same. Does anyone really believe that the suits will not leak over to personal destruction of people close to Trump like it did last time?
Years ago Law and Order was a good show, sometimes the DA won and sometimes he didn't. But then they changed it. All of a sudden the formula became 1) the DA bring a case but it flops. 2) the DA railroads the guy on some unrelated minor charge. 3) court gives the guy 100 years and everyone celebrates.
I stopped watching them cheer abuse of the justice system every week.
I’m resolved that if any Democrat ever challenges me over the election of a felon to POTUS, I’ll point out that the Constitution is silent on the issue - and I think that points to the need for a constitutional amendment. My proposal is:That’s blatantly onesided, of course. But then, Democrats have prosecuted an opposing presidential candidate for POTUS for political gain, and Republicans never have - and no self-respecting Republican voter would ever vote for a candidate who had done so.
- No person who has been convicted of a felony shall be elected president of the united states.
- If any Republican prosecutor in any state can find a cooperative judge and 12 cooperative jurors, said prosecutor and judge shall be unopposed for reelection if they convict a Democratic candidate for POTUS of a felony.
So my “proposed constitutional amendment” would only level the playing field. In reality, of course, it would be catastrophic.
History clearly would suggest that the framers of the Constitution had every reason to dismiss my proposed Article 1. After all, every man jack of them was considered “a felon” by the king of Great Britain.
In a sane world, yes, voters would behave this way because an injustice was done. Cooler heads prevailed and the Democrats had two horrible candidates in Biden and Harris. Trump's apparent sanity and ability to actually articulate his preferred policies won over those middle of the road, independent voters.
But history often is told by its winners. In the absence of any real penalty, those who prosecuted Trump with lawfare and those who failed to report it in the media will be able to walk away and dust themselves off of any crime.
In fact, knowing how those on the Left operate, their post-election analysis involves asking themselves: "How could we have lied better?"
They used all the buzzwords: indicted, prosecuted, 34-counts, felon, etc. The only one they didn't get to use was "incarcerated." (Some of them clearly wanted to use "assassinated," but thankfully that one escaped us as well.)
I don't want to see revenge, but I think retribution is necessary. Revenge will bring more of the tit-for-tat; every election cycle will inevitably bring with it the question, "Who's going to be arrested this year?" After a couple election cycles, we'll be a full-blown banana republic.
We need retribution, where those that did these things to Trump are convicted and punished with commensurate penalties. Enough to send a message to any other politically ambitious judge or prosecutor.
I won't hold my breath.
If Trump dropped dead tomorrow he accomplished more than the last 10 presidents by exposing the ultra corrupt and trenched criminal posers who hijacked this government.