Posted on 10/09/2024 7:48:33 PM PDT by Red Badger
Fan-in-wing technology powers Aurora’s concept for unprecedented speed and stealth in a vertical lift platform.
Aurora Flight Sciences, a Boeing company, is designing an X-plane that uses fan-in-wing technology to provide high-speed, runway-independent mobility for contested environments. Newly released renderings of the vertical lift concept depict a scalable technology for airborne logistics and personnel recovery missions in locations without a prepared runway.
The design work is part of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Speed and Runway Independent Technologies (SPRINT) program. The SPRINT program aims to design, build, and fly an X-plane to demonstrate the key technologies and integrated concepts that enable a transformational combination of aircraft speed and runway independence.
Aurora and Boeing are collaborating on the development of key technologies that combine to deliver a revolutionary solution to mobility challenges in contested environments and across distributed military bases. Fan-in-wing (FIW) technology combines an embedded lift fan with a blended wing body design to enable vertical lift agility without sacrificing the payload capacity and aerodynamic efficiency associated with today’s fixed wing aircraft.
Artist’s rendering of Aurora Flight Sciences’ demonstrator for the DARPA SPRINT program.
Aurora’s “vision system” concept, showing SPRINT technologies scaled for use in larger aircraft.
The team is currently designing an uncrewed demonstrator with a 45-ft wingspan and 1,000-pound payload capacity for the SPRINT program. The propulsion system includes off-the-shelf turbofan and turboshaft engines that would power the vehicle to a maximum of 450 knots true airspeed (KTAS).
The technology demonstrated in the SPRINT X-plane could be scaled to medium and heavy lift aircraft, creating a future family of systems. For example, Aurora envisions a manned, 130-ft wingspan aircraft with four lift fans and 40-ft payload bay. The FIW aircraft could meet or exceed the payloads, ranges, and speeds typical of fixed wing military transport aircraft while delivering the tactical advantage of true vertical takeoff and landing.
Artist's Rendering
“The SPRINT program offers the opportunity to deliver a game-changing capability to the warfighter,” said Mike Caimona, president and CEO of Aurora Flight Sciences. “High-speed, stealth, runway-independent transport could help keep warfighters safe and effective in contested environments, so no domain is out of reach for our U.S. military.”
Earlier this year, the team completed the first of three major test events scheduled for the current phase of the SPRINT program to prove out the feasibility of the FIW technology. The ground effect test, conducted using a 4.6-ft wingspan model with three lift fans, showed that suck down effects created by the lift fans in hover were negligible and that the landing gear is set to the appropriate height to minimize adverse pitching moments from forming during ground operations. Wind tunnel tests planned for late 2024 and early 2025 include a stability and control test using a 9-ft full wingspan aircraft model and a 5¼-ft semi-span embedded lift fan test to model aerodynamic effects.
The current phase of the program continues through May 2025 with preliminary design review scheduled for April 2025. Flight testing for the program is planned for 2027.
ABOUT AURORA FLIGHT SCIENCES
Aurora Flight Sciences, a Boeing Company, advances the future of flight by developing and applying innovations across aircraft configurations, autonomous systems, propulsion technologies, and manufacturing processes. With a passionate and agile team, Aurora delivers solutions to its customers’ toughest challenges while meeting high standards of safety and quality. Learn more at www.aurora.aero
# # #
Contact: communications@aurora.aero
>> Aurora Flight Sciences, a Boeing company
That gives me a great deal of confidence in them... how should I make out the check? 😆
I just want a few extra million 155mm.
Given their recent history, count on Boeing to screw it up.
Doomed.
Tell me fuel burn per seat mile and we might consider this. The weight penalty for an aircraft capable of near vertical takeoff and landing would be a no go. It is all about seat burn per mile. We do have aircraft that can do this for the military. Their fuel burn is of no importance as the mission is of most importance and the tax payer buys the fuel. None of these aircraft have long ranges. They have specific short range missions. You will not have aircraft that can do a Los Angeles flight to Heath row London that can do this.
Thanks for the dose of reality on fuel.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.