Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/09/2024 7:48:33 PM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Red Badger

>> Aurora Flight Sciences, a Boeing company

That gives me a great deal of confidence in them... how should I make out the check? 😆


2 posted on 10/09/2024 7:54:09 PM PDT by Nervous Tick ("First the Saturday people, then the Sunday people...": ISLAM is the problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I just want a few extra million 155mm.


3 posted on 10/09/2024 7:54:58 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie ("Whom shall I send, and who will go for us?" And I said, "Here I am! Send me." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Given their recent history, count on Boeing to screw it up.


4 posted on 10/09/2024 8:17:03 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
Meh. S.H.I.E.L.D. has had the Quinjet for years:


5 posted on 10/09/2024 9:01:02 PM PDT by PLMerite ("They say that we were Cold Warriors. Yes, and a bloody good show, too. 😁 " - Robert Conquest )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
Aurora Flight Sciences, a Boeing company

Doomed.

6 posted on 10/09/2024 10:09:28 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
Aurora and Boeing are collaborating on the development of key technologies that combine to deliver a revolutionary solution to mobility challenges in contested environments and across distributed military bases. Fan-in-wing (FIW) technology combines an embedded lift fan with a blended wing body design to enable vertical lift agility without sacrificing the payload capacity and aerodynamic efficiency associated with today’s fixed wing aircraft.

Tell me fuel burn per seat mile and we might consider this. The weight penalty for an aircraft capable of near vertical takeoff and landing would be a no go. It is all about seat burn per mile. We do have aircraft that can do this for the military. Their fuel burn is of no importance as the mission is of most importance and the tax payer buys the fuel. None of these aircraft have long ranges. They have specific short range missions. You will not have aircraft that can do a Los Angeles flight to Heath row London that can do this.

7 posted on 10/09/2024 10:48:51 PM PDT by cpdiii (cane cutter, deckhand, oilfield roughneck, drilling fluid tech, geologist, pilot, pharmacist ,MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson