Posted on 09/29/2024 11:18:19 AM PDT by Red Badger
Recent research attributes the sharp increase in global methane emissions between 2020 and 2022 to greater inundation in tropical wetlands and a decline in hydroxide in the atmosphere.
Analysis of satellite data revealed that heavy rains, likely linked to La Niña conditions, amplified methane production in wetlands by enhancing anaerobic microbial activities. These findings underscore the significance of understanding wetland dynamics to address methane’s impact on climate change.
Recent satellite data analysis reveals that the record surge in atmospheric methane emissions between 2020 and 2022 was primarily caused by more extensive inundation and water storage in wetlands, alongside a minor reduction in atmospheric hydroxide (OH). These findings are crucial for strategies aimed at reducing atmospheric methane and lessening its effect on climate change.
Pandemic Impact and Theoretical Explanations
“From 2010 to 2019, we saw regular increases – with slight accelerations – in atmospheric methane concentrations, but the increases that occurred from 2020 to 2022 and overlapped with the COVID-19 shutdown were significantly higher,” says Zhen Qu, assistant professor of marine, earth and atmospheric sciences at North Carolina State University and lead author of the research. “Global methane emissions increased from about 499 teragrams (Tg) to 550 Tg during the period from 2010 to 2019, followed by a surge to 570 – 590 Tg between 2020 and 2022.”
Atmospheric methane emissions are given by their mass in teragrams. One teragram equals about 1.1 million U.S. tons.
One of the leading theories concerning the sudden atmospheric methane surge was the decrease in manmade air pollution from automobiles and industry during the pandemic shutdown of 2020 and 2021. Air pollution contributes hydroxyl radicals (OH) to the lower atmosphere. In turn, atmospheric OH interacts with other gases, such as methane, to break them down.
“The prevailing idea was that the pandemic reduced the amount of OH concentration, therefore there was less OH available in the atmosphere to react with and remove methane,” Qu says.
Research Methodology and Findings
To test the theory, Qu and a team of researchers from the U.S., U.K., and Germany looked at global satellite emissions data and atmospheric simulations for both methane and OH during the period from 2010 to 2019 and compared it to the same data from 2020 to 2022 to tease out the source of the surge.
Using data from satellite readings of atmospheric composition and chemical transport models, the researchers created a model that allowed them to determine both amounts and sources of methane and OH for both time periods.
They found that most of the 2020 to 2022 methane surge was a result of inundation events – or flooding events – in equatorial Asia and Africa, which accounted for 43% and 30% of the additional atmospheric methane, respectively. While OH levels did decrease during the period, this decrease only accounted for 28% of the surge.
Implications of Methane Surge on Climate
“The heavy precipitation in these wetland and rice cultivation regions is likely associated with the La Niña conditions from 2020 to early 2023,” Qu says. “Microbes in wetlands produce methane as they metabolize and break down organic matter anaerobically, or without oxygen. More water storage in wetlands means more anaerobic microbial activity and more release of methane to the atmosphere.”
The researchers feel that a better understanding of wetland emissions is important to developing plans for mitigation.
“Our findings point to the wet tropics as the driving force behind increased methane concentrations since 2010,” Qu says. “Improved observations of wetland methane emissions and how methane production responds to precipitation changes are key to understanding the role of precipitation patterns on tropical wetland ecosystems.”
The research was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Reference:
“Inverse modeling of 2010–2022 satellite observations shows that inundation of the wet tropics drove the 2020–2022 methane surge” by Zhen Qu, Daniel J. Jacob, A. Anthony Bloom, John R. Worden, Robert J. Parker and Hartmut Boesch, 24 September 2024, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2402730121
The research was supported in part by NASA Early Career Investigator Program under grant 80NSSC24K1049. Qu is the corresponding author and began the research while a postdoctoral researcher at Harvard University. Daniel Jacob of Harvard; Anthony Bloom and John Worden of the California Institute of Technology’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory; Robert Parker of the University of Leicester, U.K.; and Hartmut Boesch of the University of Bremen, Germany, also contributed to the work.
 Hey! FReepers! Help Fill The Tank! How About It? Huh? It Ain't Askin' Too Much Ya Know.... Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
So, no cow farts, but the pristine, protected wetlands!
Interesting. I wonder what percentage is the truth. They should rate scientific articles like polls, margin of error, or margin of fraud in elections.
The media and other loonies muffed Trump didn’t cause it.
Climate Science, Shock Methane’s Unexpected Cooling Impact Unveiled ,LOL
Maybe the tonga explosion?
Sounds like 2024 will be a repeat.
Methane’s stable temperature is around -260 degrees Fahrenheit.
Lizzo.
“...developing plans for mitigation.”
The author misspelled depredation.
We must ban DIHYDROGEN MONOXIDE. For the children.
Anthropogenic global “warming” or “cooling” is just a myth whose sole purpose is taxation and control.
The fables about greenhouse gases, especially about methane:
https://vvv.americanthinker.com/blog/2023/10/the_fables_about_greenhouse_gases_especially_about_methane.html#:~:text=Several%20atmospheric%20gases,%20including%20carbon%20dioxide,
I thought the clot shot just caused gas. Billion of people with increased flatulence. My theory.
These people have absolutely no idea what they’re doing.
And this has been done hundreds of times.
Remember, the court has now said that unless a wetland is actually attached to w waterway, it's not a wetland.
At last...a sane decision.
Gets you into space well off your chair after a feed of beans
And we’re paying for it!................
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.