Posted on 09/05/2024 1:14:43 PM PDT by Be Careful
Since Robert Hur's report, are we able to conclude that Biden is not of sound mind? . .Answer: Yes . . If so, according to Contract Law, then is anything that Biden has signed or will sign, including Hunter's upcoming pardon, a legally enforceable document? . . This concept could be a novel approach for Trump to use, when he is sworn in to office this January. . . Who/how will Team Biden mount a challenge to this concept? . . This angle of attack could give Trump an advantage, once sworn in.
He’s not. This is why hunter pleaded guilty. Get it over with so his dad can pardon him then resign. Making Kamala the incumbent.
If Joe Biden is not competent, then his “pardon” is not legally enforceable
GMTA! Came to say the same. And it’s the Deep State doing this, as Biden is not capable of coming up with such a plan.
I say every EO. he decreed is null and void due to mental incompetence.
Joe Biden needs to be removed from office.
They’ll never let it be proven. Just have him sign the pardon, sign the resignation, and then Kamala is 47.
The focus needs to be on the legality of what Biden has signed.....if he is not of sound mind, then nothing he has signed meets the threshold for a legally enforceable document, under Contract Law
Yet he remains President.
Sullivan and Kirby are foreign policy team.
Then anything he signed is not legally binding.................
So question for lawyers out there. Is the burden of proving ‘sound mind’ on the individual in question, or is the burden of proving not of sound mind on the accuser? I would have thought the burden of proof would be on the latter, but some googling gives me the impression its on the former.
An agreement would be voidable, not void in and of itself. There would have to be an evidentiary hearing. In other words, a DC court would have to weigh in and we all know what that means.
The burden would be on the individual if he uses “incompetence” as an affirmative defense. The burden would be on the accuser if the accusation made is “incompetence”. Problem is that if an accusation of incompetence has to be proven at hearing, you may not be able to call the individual to testify - you’re already claiming he is incompetent. You would need an expert that has examined the individual to testify. There are none existing that would testify to help the accuser as far as Biden goes.
The global cabal will NOT remove their demented PUPPET and they are setting the stage for their NEXT pre-dementia PUPPET Komrade KommieLa.
Agreed......
But Trump can just state his case to void Biden’s “contracts”, move on as if they were not valid, and leave it to the “courts” for the next 2-3 years to decide, while, in the meanwhile, Trump moves on....this is the gameplay that the Progressives use against Team Us...In the meantime, he can prosecute Hunter, as if nothing has happened, if it serves Trump’s purpose in the short run
Agreed, so this goes nowhere.
At least from the time of the Hur interview.
But who has standing to challenge it?
Nothing will change. Obama was not eligible to sign legislation either yet it still stands.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.