Anyway, I know I'm old but I remember when wings were dirt cheap, now they are like caviar price wise.
Have fun it is Friday.
What was he doing? Swallowing them whole without chewing?
Don’t be a Pig when eating Chicken
So, was he not CHEWING his chicken, boneless or not?
Yet spilling hot coffee on yourself gets you $7M.
Bone-LESS means less bones, not bone free.
Apparently.
“Who gets boneless wings?”
Well, usually they are cheaper so I’d say they’re pretty popular.
Personally the price of wings at a restaurant is stupid....I’d much rather grill my own on my Weber charcoal kettle grill....you can’t get wings like that in a restaurant.
I throw a little Myron Mixons Honey Money Cluck Rub on ‘em and call it good.
That stuff makes me look like a genius. Lol!
Bone head
Must’ve been a white guy?
Perhaps that whole chew each bite 21 times rule is not entirely without merit.
If you are that easily confused you should not be allowed out without a little boy with a lamp to lead you by the hand.
An inch and a half long bone in his throat?!
Did the man not chew his food?!
No, it is not. Boneless anything means not having bones. A wing or slice of breast or the cute little tail piece can be cooked a number of different ways - fried, boiled, baked, grilled, etc.
Agree, the price of wings is ridiculous for nearly half being bones. Many years ago, when we could afford the occasional whole chicken, I'd cut off the raw wings and freeze them until there was enough to make hot wings. Wings on a cooked whole chicken usually dry out and no one wants them so cutting them off first thing was a money saver.
You might be correct from an ethical point of view, but incorrect from a legal point of view. In that case, it is always best to depend on the emotions of a jury rather than the cold calculations of a judge.
(But if yours is the liberal side of a case, then you can also depend on the emotions of a liberal judge. Life isn't fair.)
Seems like if anyone had a case, it would he him.
Boneless Chicken wings aren’t even wing meat. They’re just Chicken nuggets with a false name.
Another article about this was posted yesterday.
About half argued the suit was rightfully tossed.
And the other half argued the man had a legitimate claim.
The court ruled that one must actually attempt to chew one’s food (ideally 32 times) and not swallow one’s food whole.