.Scroll down through the article, at first it feels like nothing until you get below the fold.
The clock is ticking closer to midnight than ever before.
Nothing like a world war to justify unlimited spending & emergency election procedures...
We went to war with Germany for less in 1917.
Idiots. If they are targeting only the United States you need an IRBM in Mexio.
Inept media sabre rattling there.
Somehow I think the interests of the Mexican gov’t are divergent from those of Russia.
Why would the Russians feel the need to put intercontinental ballistic missiles on the same continent?
ICBM? So close In Mexico?
I guess they can base them in Mexico and target Barrow Alaska or something?????
Headline doesn’t make sense
Rockets? why? just drive them over on a Mexican truck. Didnt’t they see the really bad Clancy movie— that was done by “Nazis” of course not Hamas or Islamofascists fronting for Communists.
The re-write was “white supremacists” backed by a russian oligarch- sure, thhhaaaats the ticket. What crap.
Why would they deploy ICBMs in Mexico. That’s about the dumbest strategic move I’ve heard. Now were they deploying IRBMs like Cuba in ‘62 that would at least make some sense. Though in ‘62 USSR only had about 40 ICBMs of dubious quality.
The 10s of millions of illegal aliens and cartel violence and drug smuggling are killing 100,000 Americans a year. A nuke is the least of our problems with Mexico.
Why waste the resources. They already have nuke subs, rail/road-mobile and silo-based ICBMs. They don’t need to base them next door (just like we don’t need to). Total smoke and mirrors.
Why would they put a weapon with a 5,000 mile range in Mexico?
LGBQ’s, ICBM’s, mRNA’s...oh my!
.All anybody needs to know.
Other than for the humor in it, why did Newsweek even publish this piece?
No need for all that. Russia has ballistic missile subs that can be anywhere.
At that point we would have no choice but to militarize the Mexican border.... let them do it.