Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

It's the Bee!
1 posted on 06/03/2024 12:08:41 PM PDT by dayglored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: dayglored
> "Maybe we should have added a few more instructions, like, ‘No, seriously, you can't infringe on the Bill of Rights, you jackwagons," said Washington.

Priceless.

2 posted on 06/03/2024 12:10:41 PM PDT by dayglored (Strange Women Lying In Ponds Distributing Swords! Arthur Pendragon in 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored

Yeah, but there is truth in it.

Term limits would have been a good add on, along with an upper age limit to hold office.


3 posted on 06/03/2024 12:11:55 PM PDT by metmom (He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored

Good one! Sad, though.


4 posted on 06/03/2024 12:12:08 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam (Navarro didn't kill himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored

I would be interested in an exercise to “improve” the Constitution.

Some people like to say it’s just perfect and we just need to follow it. But we are now in a bad place, and the Constitution was insufficient to save us from ourselves. So I do think there is room for improvement.

As an example — yes, WE know what the Second Amendment says, but the actual wording seems have been “difficult” for some people to grasp. And now we have 10,000 gun control laws. The wording could be improved.

Taxes, tariffs, term limits and treason are all areas that could have been handled better — and that’s just the letter T.

I think working on an update would be worthwhile and I think a Constitutional Convention is needed.


8 posted on 06/03/2024 12:21:01 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (It's not "Quiet Quitting" -- it's "Going Galt".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored

His farewell address dealt with people not taking the Constitution seriously. He warned people to do so.


10 posted on 06/03/2024 12:22:21 PM PDT by caddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored
I realize this is the Bee, but, on a serious note, this country isn't dead.

Sometimes countries have to overcome serious invasions and rebellions. But that doesn't mean it's over.

Our side, the side of America as designed and built, is on the side of right and righteousness. It is on the side of freedom and decency. It is on the side of God himself (for heaven's sake).

We will get over this and be stronger for it. Take heart because this battle has just begun...and we will win.

We will win because our desire for freedom and human dignity is vastly greater than our enemy's desire to enslave us.

We are fighting for our very lives...but our enemies are merely fighting to dominate and enslave us. Whose side has the more motivating cause? Which side is worth dying for?

11 posted on 06/03/2024 12:23:29 PM PDT by RoosterRedux (A person who seeks the truth with a closed mind will never find it. He will only confirm his bias.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored

Oh, if only he and the other founding fathers could appear before Congress right now and give them the horse whooping they all deserve.


13 posted on 06/03/2024 12:24:27 PM PDT by ducttape45 (Proverbs 14:34, "Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored
"Perhaps a few notes on the absolute need to teach Judeo-Christian morality,

The word "Judeo-Christian" did not exist in Washington's time.

The History of the term Judeo-Christian.

The term “Judæo Christian” first appears in a letter from Alexander McCaul which is dated October 17, 1821. The term in this case referred to Jewish converts to Christianity.

The term was similarly used by Joseph Wolff in 1829, in reference to a type of church that would observe some Jewish traditions in order to convert Jews.

Mark Silk states in the early 19th century the term was “most widely used (in French as well as English) to refer to the early followers of Jesus who opposed” the wishes of Paul the Apostle and wanted “to restrict the message of Jesus to Jews and who insisted on maintaining Jewish law and ritual”...

The concept of Judeo-Christian ethics or Judeo-Christian values in an ethical (rather than a theological or liturgical) sense was used by George Orwell in 1939, along with the phrase “the Judaeo-Christian scheme of morals”.

Historian K. Healan Gaston has stated that the term emerged as a descriptor of the United States in 1930s, when the US sought to forge a unified cultural identity to distinguish itself from the fascism and communism in Europe.

The term rose to greater prominence during the Cold War to express opposition to communist atheism.

15 posted on 06/03/2024 12:26:17 PM PDT by Angelino97
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored

IDK, our Saint George may yet have a future date on a White Horse.


17 posted on 06/03/2024 12:28:45 PM PDT by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored

Pshaw. Ya. The Bidens are in charge.

I like the Babylon bee but this is some wimpy crap


19 posted on 06/03/2024 12:36:44 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored

God wins in the end. George will then be able to say the system worked.


21 posted on 06/03/2024 1:11:28 PM PDT by Wilderness Conservative (Nature is the ultimate conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored

Might be generous by 2 years
at the rate things are going


22 posted on 06/03/2024 1:25:26 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the Days of Lot; They did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored

The founding fathers put in the 2nd Amendment for precisely this eventuality (or probability or possibility). They did all they could. It’s up to us.


23 posted on 06/03/2024 1:40:33 PM PDT by TalBlack (I We have a Christian duty and a patriotic duty. God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored

even in jest, i’m not ready to roll over for the progressives and crater this country so they can take over to make their marxist ‘utopia’


25 posted on 06/03/2024 2:03:07 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored
‘Welp, 250 Years Wasn't A Bad Run,' Says George Washington Looking On From Heaven

Pretty sure he said that "Four Score and Seven Years" wasn't a bad run.

That's how long the original Republic lasted. What we had after 1863 was a *MASSIVE* and out of control Federal government.

26 posted on 06/03/2024 2:18:39 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dayglored

I’d suggest creating a government that is only for “a moral and religious people” yet not declaring the country Christian would eventually run into problems.

We currently are a kakistocracy: a government run by the worst, least qualified, or most unscrupulous citizens.


30 posted on 06/03/2024 3:15:42 PM PDT by Vision (Woke is communism and it has no place in America. Election Reform Now! Obama is an evildoer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson