Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum

In conjunction with HARP and chemtrails, right. Maybe we can fit sasquatch in there somewhere.


2 posted on 05/17/2024 5:29:53 PM PDT by Seruzawa ("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Seruzawa

You’re one of those people who knows everything without even looking, aren’t ya?


4 posted on 05/17/2024 5:32:49 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████ ████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Seruzawa

No! It’s Mothman flying around poisoning the clouds!


40 posted on 05/17/2024 6:15:59 PM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Seruzawa

I ain’t talkin.


56 posted on 05/17/2024 6:42:41 PM PDT by sasquatch (Do NOT forget Ashli Babbit! c/o piytar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Seruzawa

This is all BS. Most of it originally comes from a man who heads Geowatch.org, Dane Wiggington. A self professed expert in all things sunlight, wind, RF - the whole shebang. No formal training in academia. You search his background and find he used to work for the power company installing solar panels or something. He makes his living off gullible people like Alex who loves to sensationalize HAARP, 5G, chem trails, ‘seeding’ and the whole nine yards. what he likes to do is publish reams of crazy ‘papers, studies, rants’ that take days and weeks to weed through to refute all the nonsense.

“Doppler” isn’t a special radar signal. It’s a radar that maintains coherency between an outgoing pulse and incoming pulse whereby the speed of the returned object can be calculated (in the radar processor) by the frequency difference. And the different pulse PRFs are nothing more than ambiguity patterns to resolve out range Dis ambiguity.

Lastly, for a radar to ‘ionize’ air molecules (meaning actually stripping off electrons) it would have to be awesomely powerful and very dangerous to be in close proximity to. This is all sensationalist BS.


182 posted on 05/18/2024 1:50:09 PM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson