This is all BS. Most of it originally comes from a man who heads Geowatch.org, Dane Wiggington. A self professed expert in all things sunlight, wind, RF - the whole shebang. No formal training in academia. You search his background and find he used to work for the power company installing solar panels or something. He makes his living off gullible people like Alex who loves to sensationalize HAARP, 5G, chem trails, ‘seeding’ and the whole nine yards. what he likes to do is publish reams of crazy ‘papers, studies, rants’ that take days and weeks to weed through to refute all the nonsense.
“Doppler” isn’t a special radar signal. It’s a radar that maintains coherency between an outgoing pulse and incoming pulse whereby the speed of the returned object can be calculated (in the radar processor) by the frequency difference. And the different pulse PRFs are nothing more than ambiguity patterns to resolve out range Dis ambiguity.
Lastly, for a radar to ‘ionize’ air molecules (meaning actually stripping off electrons) it would have to be awesomely powerful and very dangerous to be in close proximity to. This is all sensationalist BS.
In this video the presenter says that the air was being changed between the 2 systems, so that the 2nd system would be held at bay for a while so that it wouldn’t just blend in with the current system. With it held at bay it could be timed to move forward when it would present the biggest opportunity for very damaging storms.
And you could see on the radar that anytime the weather system seemed to move east it hit something like a wall and dissipated there. It was like the whole system in the west was in a holding pattern.
What do you say causes that?