Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FACT: Governments Are Using Doppler Radar To Control The Weather
Mad Max World ^ | May 17, 2024 | The Alex Jones Show

Posted on 05/17/2024 5:25:54 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

Video of meteorologist predicting severe Texas weather two days before it occurs and showing the Doppler beams ionizing the atmosphere. The Doppler radar towers put in a couple of decades ago have ten times the power going to them required for weather forecasting. The order of magnitude of power is for weather control.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: beam; childmind; coocoo4cocoapuffs; doppler; factclickbait; failedelectronics101; failedphysics; frindecline; ninjafrogmen; nutterbutter; radar; tinfoilalert; weather; zotbutteragain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 241-256 next last
To: butterdezillion

“but you haven’t addressed the link I brought up where physicists were discussing that and it actually ends up being a question of voltage.”

I don’t do Easter egg hunts.


161 posted on 05/18/2024 8:28:10 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

I have actually said nothing about causation. I have asked questions. I have gotten no answers.

And you are STILL using red herrings - anything you can bring up EXCEPT the two pieces of evidence I specifically asked about:

1) Federal law requiring electromagnetic weather modification to be reported

2) the cone-shaped blips on the radar

I’ve also asked about a theory - specifically , what effect time reversal would have on radar capability. Again, nobody has addressed that question.

I’ll just bring up one thing from the link where physicists were addressing the question of whether radar can ionize. One poster had worked on military projects and said basically that based on what he already knows he’s not gonna argue the theoreticals about it. The strong implication was that he isn’t interested in discussing how it works because he already knows that it does. The Soviets have been waiting around for the last 80 or so years, waiting to see when or if we were ever gonna figure out this reversed time phenomenon.


162 posted on 05/18/2024 8:29:44 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

“I don’t do Easter egg hunts”.

Congratulations. You’ve invented your very own, brand new, hyper, industrial-grade logical fallacy.

You won’t look at evidence because you don’t do Easter egg hunts.

Wow. The awesomeness of your scientific integrity and intelligence has struck me speechless.

Like I said, you are not worth my time.

I’m not getting any answers here. I’m not even getting anybody PRETENDING to be scientific. And it’s a crying shame.

Anybody who was interested in genuinely digging through this has realized, along with me, that it’s pointless to try to do that here. You have successfully farted everybody out of this place.

Bye


163 posted on 05/18/2024 8:34:23 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

“I’ve also asked about a theory - specifically , what effect time reversal would have on radar capability. “

If you knew anything about physics you wouldn’t ask that question.

You won’t even admit that radar waves are non-ionizing.


164 posted on 05/18/2024 8:37:04 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

“I’ll just bring up one thing from the link where physicists were addressing the question of whether radar can ionize. “

What scientists? What did they say?


165 posted on 05/18/2024 8:40:31 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

“You have successfully farted everybody out of this place.”

Look in the mirror ...


166 posted on 05/18/2024 8:41:31 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

“I have actually said nothing about causation. “

LOL! Your reference to federal law proving radar can cause ionization!


167 posted on 05/18/2024 8:44:08 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion; TexasGator
426.666 kW per cubic meter or 426,666 MW per cubic kilometer.

The only thing getting "ionized" is your brain after smoking the contents of that bowl.

168 posted on 05/18/2024 9:06:09 AM PDT by Brellium (The environment is of upmost importance, without trees where will we hang Moscovites?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Stop making up shit. I didn’t say federal law proves anything. I asked you why the feds require reporting on electromagnetic weather modification if it’s impossible.

What that evidence shows is that the feds don’t believe it is impossible. Could they possibly know something that you don’t?

Nah! You read a textbook from 55 years ago so now you know everything. And you’re the scientific one because you insist that what was known 55 years ago has to still be all we can ever know today. None of this time reversal stuff. Can’t be real. We didn’t know about it 55 years ago.

It’s just such asinine, unscientific crap that you’re arguing. Stop lying about what I have or haven’t said so I can just ignore you as you deserve to be ignored.

I’ll say it right now. I have no idea whether or how weather modification happens. I’m asking questions to try to sort it out. What I do know is that the people claiming to be scientists here are full of crap and nobody is willing to give me an answer that dates to anything newer than 55 years ago. And I can’t help but wonder why the hell that is.

And Free Republic folks are acting and arguing as if the last 20 or so “conspiracy theories” haven’t actually already been proven true. What the hell is wrong with you people?

I’m done.


169 posted on 05/18/2024 9:09:10 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

“My understanding is admittedly limited”

“if the effect was magnified through time reversal.”

I think you have summed up your capabilities and understanding.

Ah, the old time reversal trick, how could I forget that?


170 posted on 05/18/2024 9:12:50 AM PDT by doorgunner69 (When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

Ad hominem. Blah blah blah.


171 posted on 05/18/2024 9:21:08 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Brellium

Ad hominem. Blah blah blah


172 posted on 05/18/2024 9:22:04 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

“Nah! You read a textbook from 55 years ago so now you know everything.”

LOL! Two years post-graduate work including physics, math and nuclear engineering classes. A lifetime working with radiation.


173 posted on 05/18/2024 9:30:40 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

There are over 20000 cloud seeding (AKA contrails) patents. Why would that be if it is not happening, Einstein?


174 posted on 05/18/2024 9:31:58 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████ ████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

“The Soviets have been waiting around for the last 80 or so years, waiting to see when or if we were ever gonna figure out this reversed time phenomenon.”

Please use the correct term instead of the one you read on some conspiracy site.


175 posted on 05/18/2024 9:32:41 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

“And you’re the scientific one because you insist that what was known 55 years ago has to still be all we can ever know today.”

Stop making up BS.


176 posted on 05/18/2024 9:35:32 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

“I’ll say it right now. I have no idea whether or how weather modification happens.”

How it works:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_seeding


177 posted on 05/18/2024 9:39:10 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
2) the cone-shaped blips on the radar

I'm not quite sure why you are so obsessed with this. If you have ever looked at weather radar before, surely you have noticed it. Every search radar I've ever used had spoking at times. It's a common form of clutter, and there are several causes. Sometimes it's interference from another radar or RF source. Sometimes it's environmental. Sometimes it's noise generated within the radar receiver, or arcing. In the military, sometimes it's jamming.

I’ve also asked about a theory - specifically , what effect time reversal would have on radar capability. Again, nobody has addressed that question.

Why would the time reversed (Backward) transmission have any different effect that the Forward transmission? They are both essentially the same frequency and power, with the backward transmission containing additional information from the target and transmission path. The idea is to improve detection and eliminate clutter and multi-path effects. Best case is to use a multi-static radar and time reversal. We're not talking about quantum physics time reversal, but very complex signal processing where one step involves reversing the signal in the time domain.

178 posted on 05/18/2024 1:08:41 PM PDT by ETCM (“There is no security, no safety, in the appeasement of evil.” — Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

cloud seeding has been going on a long time before planes nothing new.


179 posted on 05/18/2024 1:32:07 PM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

It’s what contrails are.

But contrails are a nutjob conspiracy theory according to nutjobs like you.


180 posted on 05/18/2024 1:35:15 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████ ████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 241-256 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson