Posted on 05/15/2024 3:49:04 AM PDT by MtnClimber
We are fast approaching something I have called the “Green Energy Wall.” The “Wall” consists of some combination of real-world obstacles, partly cost and partly physics, that will inevitably end the quest for emissions-free “net zero” electricity generation well before the goal of zero emissions is reached. I first identified the approaching Wall in this post in December 2021, and remarked that it was “gradually coming into focus” in this follow-up post in November 2023. Everyone who pays attention and is capable of doing basic arithmetic knows that the we are approaching this Wall, some jurisdictions much faster than others. (New York has voluntarily put itself in the front ranks.).
What we don’t know is how the hitting of the Wall will manifest itself: Widespread and frequent blackouts? Regular, enforced load-shedding brown-outs? Tripling or quadrupling of electricity prices? A political uprising as people realize that they have been duped by scammers claiming that an energy transition would be easy and cheap? Or perhaps it will be all of the above.
Meanwhile, the years pass slowly. The impossibility of the situation we are digging into becomes more and more obvious, but so far there is no obvious crisis. Will it arrive in another year, or two? Or maybe five?
Consider New York. Multiple statutes and regulations commit us to energy-transition mandates that simply will not be met. Among the fantasies are two major statutes passed in 2019, one for New York State (Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act), and the other for the City (Local Law 97); and vehicle emissions standards adopted in 2022 by New York’s Department of Environmental Conservation.
Start with those vehicle emissions standards. In 2022 the DEC adopted for New York the standards and requirements set forth in the California Air Resources Board’s “Advanced Clean Cars II” regulation. California’s regulations call for minimum percentages of vehicles sold to be “zero emissions” starting with the 2026 model year, and then rapidly scaling up to 100% “zero emissions” by the 2035 model year. Here is a chart from CARB of the percentages of vehicles sold, by model year, that are supposed to be “zero emissions.”:
EVs are not the only things that qualify as “zero emissions” (e.g., hydrogen vehicles qualify), but EVs are the only things that qualify and also exist in meaningful numbers. The 2026 model year begins around September 2025 — that is, about 16 months away. What is the current percent of vehicles sold in New York that are “zero emissions”? A piece on March 6, 2024 in the New York Times puts the percentage of electric vehicles sold in the New York “metropolitan area” in 2023 at less than 10%. The article does not give a figure for New York State as a whole, but undoubtedly the figure for the state — including rural upstate areas — is well less than the percentage in the City and suburbs. Meanwhile many sources report that EV sales have suddenly declined sharply in the first quarter of 2024. (I can’t find statistics on that broken down by state.). But even if EV sales in New York State continued to increase in the first months of this year, are they really going to somehow get to 35% of all sales within a little more than a year? And then to 43% after just one more year, and then 51% after one more year, and so on to 100% by 2035? This is completely ridiculous.
Equally ridiculous is the mandate in the CLCPA for 70% of electricity generation from “renewables” by 2030. The people in charge of implementing this mandate are completely incompetent and have no idea what they are doing. After passage of the Act in 2019, the first significant step, in 2020 and 2021, was to close the two zero-emissions nuclear reactors at Indian Point that provided about 25% of New York City’s electricity, and replace them with two brand new natural gas plants, thus substantially increasing emissions. So to date, the progress toward the so-called 70 x 30 goal has been negative.
The signature initiative to achieve the 70 x 30 goal is a plan for 9000 MW of offshore wind off the coast of Long Island. In this post on March 5 I did the simple arithmetic to calculate that, if all of that capacity actually gets built, it would at best provide about 16% of New York’s current electricity consumption — before the addition of new loads from the electrification of the vehicle fleet and of home heating. Granted, we have the large hydro plant at Niagara Falls that they count as “renewable,” plus some other hydro resources that, together with Niagara Falls, might come to 20% of consumption. So with those plus the offshore wind, perhaps we can get to 35% of consumption. (Meanwhile, the offshore wind projects keep getting canceled and delayed as the developers maneuver to get themselves increased prices.)
How are we going to get to 70% from renewables in under 6 years? They literally have no clue. Something called a “Scoping Plan” has been generated pursuant to the CLCPA. It foresees a need for something they call the “Dispatchable Emissions Free Resource.” This is something that does not currently exist, and likely will not exist during any relevant time frame.
Yet the lack of any viable replacement has not prevented New York from pledging to close its well-functioning natural gas plants. Several were scheduled for closure this year. But then, back in November, somebody noticed that there was nothing to replace the plants, so the forced retirement of four of these plants got postponed for two years. News flash: two years from now, we’re still not going to have anything to replace these plants. The same will be true four years from now, and six and eight and ten. Will they simply keep postponing the mandated closure? Perhaps this is how we avoid smashing into the Green Energy Wall.
And then we have Local Law 97, supposedly mandating all large (25,000 square feet and up) residential buildings to convert to electric heat, mostly by 2030. This will represent an increase in the demand on the grid by something in the range of 30%. This at the same time as the natural gas plants are mandated to close, to be only partially replaced by some highly irregular offshore wind that will not fully replace the gas generation, let alone begin to supply the increased demand.
Something has to give here, and it will give. It will be much for the best if this happens quickly, rather than dragging on for years and years.
Much like the climate change alarmist predictions of disasters are always in the future, the green wall alarmists have the same predicament. Grid failures never occur. It would be better to stress how the green agenda is undermining our standard of living.
Big Oil should file a suit forcing the state to meet every single one of its legislated goals. Don’t let the greentards off the hook.
EC
Those pesky laws of physics!
It seems to be true what you said about the laws of physics & thermodynamics being overridden by grandstanding morons, but stop & think about the types who seemingly are running the country right now.
Even the Left are coming around to nuclear power. The huge power requirements for AI data centers have pushed guys like Bill Gates to champion nuclear power.
Problem: The environmental and construction regulations governing the building of nuclear plants are so oppressive that it will take decades to build them.
Or Obama….
That’s where we’re headed unless we stop the quickly.
Stop them
Stopping it quickly is becoming more difficult with each graduation class, each one putting out molded climatons.
“The laws of Physics/Thermodynamic trump the laws passed by grandstanding morons every time.”
I took Thermo in college from a genuine card-carrying NASA scientist. He hated the idiot free energy nuts, what today we call The Greens. He had us work through every possible Green Scheme from electric cars to free air-conditioning from ground water. He had us make the most generous assumptions and then figure out the physics and the economics. Nothing, and I mean, nothing was more efficient and cleaner than the standard oil, coal and gas we were already using.
Right now, most of the Western world is facing a demographic suicide where fewer children are born. I think that directly relates to the cost of trying to do something that isn’t possible. People won’t have children if they can’t afford them.
Around here they are powered by 95% coal and oil...
btt
Stupid is as stupid does.
The Net Zero move takes the population to zero, too.
The northeastern states were expecting to rely on Quebec hydropower, but there is not enough of it and people and groups will oppose the building of new dams.
“offshore wind off the coast of Long Island”
A check of the National Weather Service site will show that the offshore wind is too fickle in terms of volume and location.
It is the thought that matters.
Chinese EVs are cheap and available, but “100%” Joe recently placed massive tariffs on them to secure the UAW vote.
What about vehicle safety regulations? They could be waived by changing the law.
“Even the Left are coming around to nuclear power. The huge power requirements for AI data centers have pushed guys like Bill Gates to champion nuclear power.”
Some on the left came around long ago. Most leftists won’t budge.
Sanity from MC
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.