Posted on 03/07/2024 9:56:55 AM PST by Tench_Coxe
Digging into Revolver’s investigations, it’s clear we’ve uncovered a ton about the Global American Regime’s playbook for color revolutions, spotlighting major figures like the dark mistress of color, Victoria Nuland. She’s been a key architect behind numerous attempts to derail President Trump’s political path and squash his populist wave. Remember the “Orange” number during Trump’s first impeachment trial? That was one of Victoria’s masterpieces, with a guy named George Kent playing a very pivotal role.
So, where did George clock in? Right in the heart of the department that handles—you guessed it—”color revolutions.” The Revolver piece goes on:
But once one takes a look at what George Kent’s job actually is at the State Department, the story becomes far more suggestive—even explosive. Kent just happens to be Deputy Assistant Secretary in the European and Eurasian Bureau. This bureau is generally known as the State Department hub for so-called “Color Revolutions,” through which the State Department, together with covert agencies and a constellation of allied NGOs influence, and at times overturn, elections in foreign countries. Indeed, one former senior state department official has told Revolver News that Kent is a “color revolution expert” — a designation that has been corroborated to Revolver by two current senior State Department sources.
(Excerpt) Read more at revolver.news ...
WHAT THE HECK IS A ‘COLOR RVOLUTION’?..................
The BLM riots were a part of it.
The article presents these things as mostly innocuous, instead of the sinister things they actually are.
We are the Bad Guys.
We start revolutions around the world, disrupting societies and causing deaths because we feel like it.
The CIA is the State Dept.
The State Dept is the CIA.
The CIA serves the CIA and is not interested in serving the needs of America.
If America is one of those societies which “needs to be overthrown”, the CIA is happy to do so. As we have seen.
And all of this goes back to at least 1963.
The Church Commission uncovered an amazing pile of dirt—but at the end of the day nobody went to jail.
CIA Director Colby did stop some of the abuses for a while—and then he ended up mysteriously dead in the Potomac and everything went back to where it was before.
Fixed.
100%
It’s just using some color to represent your movement. Anyone can do this. The trouble is that a color labeled movement is totally easy for your opponent to co-opt it, or for there to be mission drift.
Have you been living in a hole in the ground? Just google it.
Colby had the very bad habit of breathing while knowing too much about the dirty deeds of the CIA.
We all know now why our nation is awful at installing regimes around the world.
They have 90% of our industry/institution/billionaires colluding/conspiring on their behalf.
Yet they need to import millions of voters anyway.
Why don’t the authors explain what they are discussing? I see acronyms and terms like “color revolution “ thrown around as if everyone knows what these things are. There was an article about non-binary heteronormity recently that never explains what it is supposed to be.
That is a very good article at the link.
Tagging the movement with a color is just one aspect. The main thing is the stirring up of opposition though civil disorder and riots, waves of internet outrage, violent language or threats by feminists, minorities, etc. Any group that can be stirred up against the targeted leadership by the global marxists will be stirred up, every revolutionary thing short of armed revolution.
So, don’t pay attention to color, pay really close attention to side issues that crop up. Which is what I said.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.