Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are Extreme Speed and Accuracy Necessary to Defend Against Bears?
AmmoLand ^ | January 4, 2024 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 01/05/2024 4:05:03 AM PST by marktwain

In the debate about effective defense methods against aggressive bears, some people claim extreme speed and accuracy are essential to stopping a bear attack with firearms. Here are some quotes.

From Efficacy of Firearms for Bear Deterrence in Alaska:

The need for split-second deployment and deadly accuracy make using firearms difficult, even for experts.

From cowboystatedaily.com:

 Many experts seem to favor bear spray. One drawback of firearms they cite is the inability of many shooters to make accurate, quick-kill shots under the extreme stress of a bear attack.

From backcountrychronicles.com:

If you shoot something as big as a grizzly bear and are not lucky enough to penetrate their skull or clip the spinal chord on the 1st shot, it might just piss them off. The average elk can run 100 yards after a double lung shot, so how long do you think grizz can continue to whip your ass before it dies? The bear will eventually die, but you will still die first.

This argument appears to be based on conjecture and myth, with very little data.  Most readers have access, over the Internet, to the same data as this correspondent. All cases where a handgun was fired in defense against a bear, which could be documented, are included. This was done to prevent selection bias. There are 174 cases which have been published so far. They are all available on AmmoLand, most with links to original sources.

To test the theory of the necessity of a central nervous system hit, delivered very fast (roughly less than three seconds) the incidents were evaluated to determine if both a central nervous system hit was required and the hit had to be delivered very rapidly.

(Excerpt) Read more at ammoland.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: attack; banglist; bear; bears; handgun
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
Over 90% of successful defenses against bears, where a handgun was fired, did not require a fast, central nervous system hit.
1 posted on 01/05/2024 4:05:03 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Animals respond to pain. Getting shot hurts.

Seems simple enough to me.

L


2 posted on 01/05/2024 4:11:36 AM PST by Lurker ( Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Correct. Same idea as with bear spray.

Firearms have the added advantage of inflicting structural damage and death.

A dead bear doesn't come back to attack you some more.

A dead bear doesn't learn and go attack another person.

A dead bear doesn't pass on its propensity to attack humans to new bear generations.

3 posted on 01/05/2024 4:15:51 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Who was it that said “When gunpowder speaks beasts listen.”?

L


4 posted on 01/05/2024 4:18:03 AM PST by Lurker ( Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

If these “bear spray journalists” were being dropped off in the middle of grizzly country and told they have to hike out with only with a map, a compass and a choice between bear spray and a handgun.......which do you think they would choose?


5 posted on 01/05/2024 4:26:17 AM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page. More photos added.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

The true believers will take bear spray.

Some are far more concerned about saving bears then themselves.

The propaganda that favors spray has been pushed hard and heavy.


6 posted on 01/05/2024 4:30:34 AM PST by riverrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: riverrunner
The true believers will take bear spray.

Charles Darwin is smiling in his grave.

7 posted on 01/05/2024 4:32:43 AM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page. More photos added.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

The same “speed and accuracy” arguments about handguns also apply to bear spray.

To be effective at all, you need to get it out of your pocket quickly and hit the bear in the face with the stream.

You also have a big range disadvantage. A handgun can hit a bear from over 50 yards away. Bear spray range is much shorter.


8 posted on 01/05/2024 4:44:18 AM PST by SauronOfMordor (Either you will rule. Or you will be ruled. There is no other choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
Handguns have the advantage of 150 years of ergonomic development of handguns and holsters.

Handguns have become intuitive "point and bang" devices. Holsters have been developed to be secure and safe, while facilitating fast, easy access.

Bear spray and bear spray holsters don't have anywhere near the level of ergonomic development which handguns and handgun holsters do.

9 posted on 01/05/2024 4:48:03 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Bullets fired into the wind won’t blow back in your face.


10 posted on 01/05/2024 4:48:47 AM PST by gundog (It was a bright cold day in April, and the clocks were striking thirteen. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

You really seem to be obsessed with bears.


11 posted on 01/05/2024 4:49:31 AM PST by CodeToad (Rule #1: The elites want you dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Heavy caliber, high expansion resulting in maximum energy dump would seem to be the order of the day.

CC


12 posted on 01/05/2024 4:57:29 AM PST by Celtic Conservative (My cats are more amusing than 200 channels worth of TV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad; marktwain

I too noticed lots of bear spray vs pistol articles of late.

But I don’t believe it’s an obsession. And if it is, it’s more fruitful than Russia - UK or DeSantis vs Trump.

What seems to be up (Mr Twain can confirm) is that there has been some wellspring of “all you need is spray” adherents. That is being countered by Ammoland.

What I can’t figure out, is who in their right mind would argue AGAINST a firearm?

Perhaps, with Covid, many anti-gunners started going on walks and hikes. It turns out they like the wilderness. Now, they’re walking alongside “gun nuts’ and spouting their spray gospel.

This is all conjecture. Your mileage may vary.


13 posted on 01/05/2024 5:00:24 AM PST by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s²)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

No, I just have to be faster than whoever is with me!........


14 posted on 01/05/2024 5:19:53 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while l aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad; marktwain

We are up to our ears in bears here in FLORIDA!!!!!........


15 posted on 01/05/2024 5:22:41 AM PST by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while l aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I’ve spent many nights on the Yukon River by myself farrrr away from any people. I always carried a .500 S & W on a homemade holster suspended from a both shoulders harness which reduced/eliminated back pain after hours of wear.

Practicing SAFE camping (ate/cooked one place then moved downriver 10 miles) and no fires at my 2nd (sleeping) campsite and all food in a bear barrel, I never saw a bear close up. Thank you lord because I did not want to shoot one.


16 posted on 01/05/2024 5:29:36 AM PST by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob
I too noticed lots of bear spray vs pistol articles of late.

But I don’t believe it’s an obsession. And if it is, it’s more fruitful than Russia - UK or DeSantis vs Trump.

What seems to be up (Mr Twain can confirm) is that there has been some wellspring of “all you need is spray” adherents. That is being countered by Ammoland.

What I can’t figure out, is who in their right mind would argue AGAINST a firearm?

Some of it is random. I write full time, with hundreds of drafts in progress. During the holidays, there seems a downturn in court cases and other common subjects.

Bear articles may be the most popular series of mine at AmmoLand. Most of the articles I publish at AmmoLand are published in an excerpt here on freerepublic.

Freerepublic is a home on the Internet for me. Freerepubic offers great feedback and debate, lively discussion, and much expertise. Freerepublic helps to keep me sharp and careful to make sure what I write as fact, holds up to examination.

Bear spray proponents have made many claims which do not hold up to examination. Those claims have almost certainly gotten people killed. The problems with the "research" published about bear spray are very similar to the "climate change" pseudo-science, but much easier to debunk.

17 posted on 01/05/2024 5:44:12 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

You say that like it’s a problem.


18 posted on 01/05/2024 5:48:55 AM PST by OKSooner ("You won't like what comes after America." - Leonard Cohen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Guns and pepper spray…

No one ever mentions ninjas


19 posted on 01/05/2024 5:49:49 AM PST by aMorePerfectUnion (I didn't come here to guide lambs, but to awaken lions 🦅 MAGADONIAN ⚔️)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Who was it that said “When gunpowder speaks beasts listen.”?

Great quote. I would love to find a source.

20 posted on 01/05/2024 5:56:04 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson