Posted on 11/17/2023 11:26:41 PM PST by Morgana
A California male nanny smirked as he was jailed for 707 years for molesting more than a dozen young boys in his care.
Matthew Antonio Zakrzewski was convicted of sexually assaulting 16 boys aged two to 14, as well as showing another child pornography last month.
The 34-year-old babysitter carried out the sordid campaign of abuse from 2014 until his arrest in May 2019. Many of his crimes were filmed and played in court.
'We watched you turn molestation into a game,' Orange County Superior Court Judge Kimberly Menninger told him on Friday.
During his sentencing, the grandmother of one of his victims begged the Menninger: 'A death sentence is too good for him... Please show no mercy on this animal.'
Zakrzewski, of Costa Mesa, maintained eye contact with his victim's families as they read their impact statements.
He told them he wants their sons, 'to break through the clouds and shine bright,' but did not apologize, ABC7 reports.
Zakrzewski's crimes came to light after a Laguna Beach family reported him for inappropriately touching their son.
He went on to be convicted of 34 felonies, including lewd and lascivious acts with a minor after investigators uncovered video evidence of his sick crimes.
At sentencing, the families of his victims wept as they read emotional impact statements detailing therapy they have had to undergo.
One mother described having to take her 12-year-old son for tests for sexually transmitted diseases.
'I have grieved my son's childhood while he was still a child,' she said. 'I can't look at his sweet baby photos anymore without crying. All I can see is a child who was being abused and manipulated not to speak up.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
pedophiles have no redeeming qualities.
They cannot be rehabilitated.
Kill them.
And those that support them.
This includes participating prosecuting attorneys and judges.
Take all 707 years to kill him.
That stat could be a artifact of males being less likely to report abuse by a female.
He’ll be smirking out of the other side of his whatever pretty soon.
Although I can’t be sure I’m very much inclined to believe that females rarely abuse boys. However,a lesbian can certainly abuse girls.
Yes,there’s certainly a good argument to be made in favor of the DP for molesters. But the one argument against it is it gives the abuser an incentive to kill his victim.
Just looking at his photo, who in their right mind would let him near their kids??
Yes - but they are publishing what no US news agency will: The media and their owners are rabid Leftists and block any view of the sleazebags and criminals.
They do publish stories about their own perverts and murderers, as well as other countries' - so despite your presumption of anti-US bias, they are quite even-handed.
Just keep reading - or you'll never hear any of this anywhere.
Yeah, me too - when I was 12-14, I would routinely be asked to babysit the children of neighbors because I was the oldest of ten kids, responsible, and the people who hired me felt safer with a young man protecting their kids.
I did well and it never occurred to me to harm those young kids. Today is different and the perverts are all over the place.
I do not want to live in a country that supports torture. Of anyone.
The J6 people did not deserve torture.
An effective penal system is an excellent deterrent
I don't know. Not even sure where I picked this up. And I'm pretty sure it wasn't even in my vocabulary prior to 9/11. But there are more variations out there...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allahu_Akbar_(disambiguation)
It's even a former national anthem...
He obviously hasn’t heard about how much the hardened inmates hate child molesters. I doubt if he will last 6 months.
Although I agree with you that males more often abuse girls we can never discount confirmation bias.
We see the things that we expect to see and fail to notice that which does not confirm that which we believe.
Guys obviously abuse boys *and* girls...of all ages And it’s easy to imagine lesbians abusing girls. But women abusing boys? Teenagers,maybe. But that’s an issue for another discussion. Women abusing young boys? It’s hard for me to imagine that happening.
That is what confirmation bias is about
You don’t see what you can’t imagine unless you can’t avoid it or it is too obvious to ignore.
This is why people fail to notice the signs of impending suicide in a family member or friend.
But I don’t see a woman getting a thrill doing it to a young boy. Lesbians and girls...yah,I get that. But not the other way. But I suppose I could be wrong.
How do you define “bad”? You are, after all, from the Gay State.
3
When did it change from Ala Ackbar to Alahu Ackbar? Initially it was always Allah Ackbar. Like for years and then all of a sudden it changed
I think they don’t. When you say “Allahu Al-Akbar” this means that there is another Allah and this is unacceptable, because “Allah” is only one. But when you say “Allah Akbar” this means that Allah is greater than anyone or anything else and this is acceptable.
Allah Akbar means “Allah is the greatest”. That’s correct.
Allahu Al-Akbar means “Allah, who is great”. That’s wrong.
0
Maybe this would be a good Question for the Arabic SE proposal!
I’m no expert but to give you a short answer yes both would have at first sight the same meaning, but Allahu al-Akbar or Allah ul-Akbar الله الاكبر includes some kind of shirk because it’s a comparisons as if you said Allah is greater then... so the listener would expect a deity/something/somebody with whom Allah would be compared in his greatness. But as is this “statement” wouldn’t really make sense because something is missing! So it would be wrong as!
While Allahu Akbar الله اكبر is clearly saying: Allah is greater, and this is the most safe (from shirk) and only used expression in Islam.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.