Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/02/2023 11:15:43 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: Red Badger

If everyone knows they’re AI Generated, what’s the big deal. They aren’t real.


2 posted on 11/02/2023 11:18:31 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

AI will bring in Utopia!


3 posted on 11/02/2023 11:19:50 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (When I say "We" I speak of, -not for-, "We the People")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I guess it reduces the cost of having fake .... installed :)


4 posted on 11/02/2023 11:20:08 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

...now just add fake audio of them yelling racial slurs and vicious profanity.


6 posted on 11/02/2023 11:21:21 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

“While celebrity likenesses from Oprah Winfrey to Pope Francis...”

Nope!


8 posted on 11/02/2023 11:23:15 AM PDT by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Some corporal punishment might go a long ways to discouraging this.


11 posted on 11/02/2023 11:24:37 AM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Just talking to my wife about this a couple days ago when we were watching a "Google Pixel" ad on TV where they were replacing people's heads and smiles in pictures.

You'll never know whether an image is "real" anymore. And it won't be long before AI can cause anybody to be "pornified".
16 posted on 11/02/2023 11:27:34 AM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Well, now you can say that “A-I” stands for “plausible deniability”.


20 posted on 11/02/2023 11:29:28 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

As quality increases, soon no more whores for porn or OnlyFans.

Back to having to sleep with a guy 30 years older for money…


21 posted on 11/02/2023 11:29:37 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

“The lack of clarity on such images’ legality...”

There’s no lack of clarity. They are not child pornography. They’re not copyrighted material. They don’t constitute fraud, as long as nobody is charging money for them and purporting them to be real. So they’re not illegal.

The only way they could be illegal is if they are ruled obscene, but if they are, then Playboy, Hollywood, and millions of OnlyFans models are in deep doo doo.


24 posted on 11/02/2023 11:34:34 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Appropriating a person’s likeness could easily be a tort, but appears not to be criminal, especially if the nude bodies are AI and not actual photographs. It’s certainly not a nice thing to do to a young girl. Harassment laws are frequently used in these cases, although constitutionally dubious. If they never intended the girls to see such images, a case for harassment would likely fail. Criminal laws are no replacement for basic decency and civility.


25 posted on 11/02/2023 11:34:46 AM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

How to they know it was a boy who generated the images?


33 posted on 11/02/2023 11:39:04 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

The girls should have posted fake photos of the boys with comically small penis size.


46 posted on 11/02/2023 11:52:00 AM PDT by zeestephen (Trump "Lost" By 43,000 Votes - Spread Across Three States - GA, WI, AZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
A priest and a rabbi were sitting next to each other in an airplane. After a while, the priest turned to the rabbi and asked, 'Is it still a requirement of your faith that you not eat pork?'

The rabbi responded, 'Yes, that is still one of our laws.' The priest then asked, 'Have you ever eaten pork?'

To which the rabbi replied, 'Yes, on one occasion I did succumb to temptation and tasted a ham sandwich.' The priest nodded in understanding and went on with his reading.

A while later, the rabbi spoke up and asked the priest, 'Father, is it still a requirement of your church that you remain celibate?'

The priest replied, 'Yes, that is still very much a part of our faith.'

The rabbi then asked him, 'Father, have you ever fallen to the temptations of the flesh?'

The priest replied, 'Yes, rabbi, on one occasion I was weak and broke with my faith.'

The rabbi nodded understandingly and remained silent, thinking, for about five minutes.

Finally, the rabbi said, 'Beats the hell out of a ham sandwich, doesn't it?'

47 posted on 11/02/2023 11:52:43 AM PDT by Osage Orange (I miss Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

I watched a video on Edgar Cayce long time ago and the one thing he predicted was our machines would turn on us. At the time I was thinking, what is my table saw going to chase me, is my blender going to turn on at a bad time, is my lawn going to eat my foot. With computers becoming more integrated into everyday life and we become more and more dependent on them AI could really make our lives very difficult.


53 posted on 11/02/2023 12:02:52 PM PDT by Keyhopper (Indians had bad immigration laws)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

AI is just Photoshop on steroids.


62 posted on 11/02/2023 12:06:48 PM PDT by Fledermaus (It's time to get rid of the Three McStooges; Mitch, Kevin and Ronna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
When girls at Westfield High School in New Jersey found out boys were sharing nude photos of them in group chats, they were shocked, and not only because it was an invasion of privacy. The images weren’t real.

How can it be an invasion of privacy if it isn't real?

63 posted on 11/02/2023 12:08:16 PM PDT by gitmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger; All

This cant be deemed a crime. It’s just Art. Not real. Im sure they’ll mske this illegal because they are thugs but it’s not. I wouldnt like it if it were done “to” my daughter or someone close to me but....that shouldn’t make it illegal. They are going to use all of this to continue stripping away rights. The only punishment to the kids should be having nude or pornographic images in school.


67 posted on 11/02/2023 12:14:54 PM PDT by wiseprince (Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Fake porn...now that’s going too far !!!


70 posted on 11/02/2023 12:19:19 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

this thread is worthless without pictures


88 posted on 11/02/2023 1:02:16 PM PDT by changeitback440
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson