Posted on 10/16/2023 8:39:32 AM PDT by Red Badger
This just might be the most SAVAGE Twitter Community Note fact-check of all time.
WaPo tried to run a puff piece on this dude at a college in Wyoming who tried to join a sorority and faced a lawsuit from the real girls in the sorority (and won!) because they didn't want a dude in their private spaces and claimed he was creeping on them.
Now the man is a victim.
But check out this Community Note (screenshot in case it disappears).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You can read the absolutely disgusting and graphic details about Langford in our previous coverage:
Langford arguably used this loophole so he could get access to women. The women said he was a voyeur who was physically aroused around them.
...21-year-old Artemis Langford, has been "watching" the female members of the sorority house. It alleged that during one of these peeping incidents, Langford had a visible "erection."
Oh, and get this:
The judge in the case forced all the girls in the suit to go public with their complaints and reveal their identities, only to then rule against them and publicly shame them for their trouble. And here's how WaPo covered this guy:
It wasn't what she [sic] imagined last year when she [sic] joined Kappa Kappa Gamma at the University of Wyoming, becoming the first transgender woman [sic] in the state to be inducted into a sorority. She [sic] thought she [sic] had finally found sisterhood and a place to belongafter years of shame and loneliness.
Instead, she [sic] became a target.
Yes, this piece is all about how Langford became a "target" for hate because he... checks notes... joined a sorority as a male to get his sexual kicks in private spaces under the guise of "transgenderism."
This story is all about how "right-wing" haters (like yours truly) noticed the large man was a man and that he didn't belong in the girls' rooms, and how evil those seven women were for filing a lawsuit against the "first transgender" sorority member in Wyoming.
Keep clowning yourself, WaPo. Keep letting people know what you truly are!
Looks like Meg Griffin.
THEY INVITED IT...................
Have you ever fought liberals? I have done several things that brought the ire of liberals down on me, and they will try to hurt you.
They will try to get you fired from your job. They will try to humiliate you in public. They will actually try to injure you or worse.
I had liberals sneak onto my property in the middle of the night and set fire to my grass in the hopes it would burn me out. Thankfully the rural fire department was alerted quickly and came along to put it out before it got going too badly to fight.
They will try to hurt you if you make them angry, and telling them that this man is not a woman is a good way to make them angry.
As for the Judge, he should not even have bothered to consider this notion of a man becoming a woman. He should have simply ruled men are not allowed in a woman's sorority and ruled for the girls immediately.
It is my understanding that the national chapter did this, and the local chapter in Wyoming had nothing to do with it.
This is being imposed upon them by liberal bubbleheads in big cities and universities in the rest of the country.
Pursuing legal action anonymously is an egregious violation of the foundational principles of our legal system. “You’re being sued, Diogenes — but we are not going to tell you who the plaintiffs are. You can’t depose them, cross-examine them, or even do any preparation for this lawsuit. Oh — and for all you know, they may not even exist.”
I don’t think I’ve seen a more preposterous post here on FR in years.
I would hardly characterize the law as "working". It operates, but it routinely churns out idiotic ridiculous immoral and illogical results.
It is one of the most dysfunctional thing in our society.
You’re being sued, Diogenes — but we are not going to tell you who the plaintiffs are. You can’t depose them, cross-examine them, or even do any preparation for this lawsuit. Oh — and for all you know, they may not even exist.”
They were suing the boy, or were they suing the Sorority? It would seem to me the Sorority caused the injury.
Doesn't matter. This should have resulted in an immediate ruling against allowing men into a sorority. That would be the sane thing to do.
If that’s true they got what they deserve.
Thanks.
“Close the chapter. Let the freak have the house all to himself.”
exactly ...
They thought they’d get that fun gay guy from Schitt’s Creek.
Instead they got Jigglypuff with a penis.
“I think it was the national chapter that approved men to be admitted - not that local chapter.”
It was, at least according to the article. But given that, why did they take the dude to court, instead of the national organization?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
