Replies

For example … why would anyone complain about a judge refusing to allow adult plaintiffs to pursue a lawsuit anonymously? It seems odd that anyone would even object to such a standard practice.

Have you ever fought liberals? I have done several things that brought the ire of liberals down on me, and they will try to hurt you.

They will try to get you fired from your job. They will try to humiliate you in public. They will actually try to injure you or worse.

I had liberals sneak onto my property in the middle of the night and set fire to my grass in the hopes it would burn me out. Thankfully the rural fire department was alerted quickly and came along to put it out before it got going too badly to fight.

They will try to hurt you if you make them angry, and telling them that this man is not a woman is a good way to make them angry.

As for the Judge, he should not even have bothered to consider this notion of a man becoming a woman. He should have simply ruled men are not allowed in a woman's sorority and ruled for the girls immediately.

I know exactly how liberals operate. I also know how the law works.

Pursuing legal action anonymously is an egregious violation of the foundational principles of our legal system. “You’re being sued, Diogenes — but we are not going to tell you who the plaintiffs are. You can’t depose them, cross-examine them, or even do any preparation for this lawsuit. Oh — and for all you know, they may not even exist.”

I don’t think I’ve seen a more preposterous post here on FR in years.