The physical evidence could make a reasonable person question that.
Posted on 10/05/2023 5:43:13 PM PDT by gnarledmaw
Where are the people from millions of years? Fossil fuel š¤£š¤£š¤£
New Mexico parks and government land (which is basically the whole state) were shut down most of the time. Later they were open but insane.
I was hiking with a group of Israelis in the Lincoln forest, no people near and ordered (by a park ranger who looked like he was going to draw his weapon) to put a mask on.
He drove his off road buggy thing over a mile to order us to put masks on and then kept following us at a distance for an hour.
Then the pandemic rolled in. They couldnāt return to the Basin
AYFKM? A site in the middle of not much and you were stymied?
Must be me,,,except for travel to the EU I pretty much went everywhere.
Bkmk
Ice and ocean constraints on early human migrations into North America along the Pacific coast
Abstract
Founding populations of the first Americans likely occupied parts of Beringia during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). The timing, pathways, and modes of their southward transit remain unknown, but blockage of the interior route by North American ice sheets between ~26 and 14 cal kyr BP (ka) favors a coastal route during this period. Using models and paleoceanographic data from the North Pacific, we identify climatically favorable intervals when humans could have plausibly traversed the Cordilleran coastal corridor during the terminal Pleistocene. Model simulations suggest that northward coastal currents strengthened during the LGM and at times of enhanced freshwater input, making southward transit by boat more difficult. Repeated Cordilleran glacial-calving events would have further challenged coastal transit on land and at sea. Following these events, ice-free coastal areas opened and seasonal sea ice was present along the Alaskan margin until at least 15 ka. Given evidence for humans south of the ice sheets by 16 ka and possibly earlier, we posit that early people may have taken advantage of winter sea ice that connected islands and coastal refugia. Marine ice-edge habitats offer a rich food supply and traversing coastal sea ice could have mitigated the difficulty of traveling southward in watercraft or on land over glaciers. We identify 24.5 to 22 ka and 16.4 to 14.8 ka as environmentally favorable time periods for coastal migration, when climate conditions provided both winter sea ice and ice-free summer conditions that facilitated year-round marine resource diversity and multiple modes of mobility along the North Pacific coast.
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2208738120
The one thing we are certain of is that the first inhabitants came from the west not from the east. So they came from Asia and not from Africa, and definitely not from Europe.
āNonsense. Recorded history is only six to seven thousand years. Where were these people before that? Extrapolate further to evolutionary postulates that man has been around for at least three million years and we have a problem. What were all these supposed humans doing during that time?
Yet we have a six thousand year history from supposedly living in ācavesā to making computers. Where all all the bodies? Millions of years and they could not figure out how to get out of a cave and build a house? Nonsense.ā
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
There has been such an explosion of advances in the last few thousand years, that it makes me wonder how this ties in with Genesis.
Instead of God creating the entire bodies of Adam and Eve (whether instantly if you take Genesis literally, or slowly over a period of millions of years as the science seems to indicate), perhaps, a few thousand years ago, He just āupgradedā the brains of the existing humans. So we are the result of a 2-step process, not just 1-step.
He just āupgradedā the brains of the existing humans. So we are the result of a 2-step process, not just 1-step.
Could be.
Even many evolutionists have used the idea of slow and gradual change, and then something big happens to give the life-form a change.
See punctuated equilibrium (things are pretty constant for most of the time and then a big change) and the “hopeful monster” theory.
The evolutionists see it happening by chance and environment, but so many mutations have to happen at the same time it points to a Designer.
Genesis is not a science book, but it gives some pretty interesting descriptions of how everything was created which match much of what we see in science. I wonder how many creation stories have humans being made first and then the world is created for them?
The word “day” in the Hebrew can also refer to an “age”. Like “back in the day of the dinosaurs...”
I’m open to most theories when it comes to God’s creation.
Our pastor is along the lines that I think, but he is also open to the idea of actual 24-hour days and gives scripture for that. He said something like “And, while I think the fossil record makes sense the way we commonly understand it, if God wanted to - He could have made the earth LOOK that old from the very beginning. He created Adam “old”, as a full-grown mature adult.” I thought that was an interesting take on it.
Here in the great state of Washington the governor halted all group work on projects until all the workers were vaccinated. Including the volunteer highway litter clean-up. Outside! For TWO YEARS! Most litter programs were re-instated in March, 2022.
“The one thing we are certain of is that the first inhabitants came from the west not from the east.”
But much sooner than thought... In fact I believe in the theory that first man was on the American continent 130,000 years ago. I myself have found Mousterian stone tools in California. But of course this does not fit the narrative.
The physical evidence could make a reasonable person question that.
The Indians were Mongols who walked here before what are now Russia and Alaska separated.
Thanks gnarledmaw!
The park was closed................
That is not known for certain.
Have you ever heard of the Solutrean hypothesis?
One of the biggest arguments against it is that the timeline doesn’t make sense. If we just pushed back the human presence on the continent to >21K then the timeline might make sense.
Everything keeps getting older.
If you want to really blow your mind, look into the theory of how self-awareness evolved in humans.
One theory says before self-awareness evolved, we were like gorillas or monkeys in that we had no ability to know what others were thinking about us or any ability to deceive.
Then through evolution driven by sexual strategy, female humans evolved the ability to deceive males in order to have multiple sexual partners without the male learning about it and killing or abandoning her offspring. Without self awareness, the males would be as easy to deceive as a dog. The female could continually find new, more beneficial sexual partners to pass her genes down while also maintaining the day to day support of her mate.
In this, she would have evolved the ability to differentiate between lies and truth or put another way....”the knowledge of good and evil”.
The theory posits that sometime after females gained this trait, males also gained it.
Some years ago I was talking with a woman in an east Coast bar. She was an anthropologist from California. This was during the time when no one before Clovis was still the general view. She said she was connected with a small group that had found remains they believed were around 200,000 years old and were in trouble for their belief. I wonder if this very old remains info has ever made it into the more general ancient human remains controversy/discussion?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
