Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

_Global plant growth surging alongside carbon dioxide--- 2017
NOAA ^ | Updated_January 26, 2023

Posted on 07/26/2023 2:29:41 PM PDT by dennisw

Focus areas: Research Topics: carbon dioxide Share: Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share by email Print . Updated to correct a broken link. April 20, 2017

A trace gas present in the atmosphere in miniscule amounts is helping scientists answer one of the biggest questions out there: Has plant growth increased alongside rising levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere?

It turns out the answer is Yes – in a big way. A new study published in the April 6 edition of the journal Nature concludes that as emissions of carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels have increased since the start of the 20th century, plants around the world are utilizing 30 percent more carbon dioxide (CO2), spurring plant growth.

In 2007, NOAA scientist Stephen Montzka wrote a pivotal paper that identified the trace gas, carbonyl sulfide, as a key to estimating how much CO2 plants are taking in as they grow.

Recently, Montzka was part of a team of scientists led by Elliot Campbell of University of California, Merced, that reviewed the 54,000-year record for atmospheric carbonyl sulfide from measurements of air trapped in the snowpack at the South Pole. “When we did, we discovered a massive, changing signal from the biosphere,” he says.

Why carbonyl sulfide?

Plants take up CO2 when they photosynthesize, but they release it when they respire, decay or are burned. That means that the removal rate of CO2 by plants can’t be directly estimated on global scales from measurements of CO2 alone.

But plants need other nutrients, including sulfur – and once they grab it, they don’t give it back. Carbonyl sulfide – or COS, a molecule comprised of a carbon atom, a sulfur atom and an oxygen atom – is found in tiny amounts (parts per trillion) in the atmosphere. Ongoing NOAA sampling and analysis of air trapped in Antarctic ice cores has enabled scientists to estimate changes in plant consumption of carbonyl sulfide during the past 100 years and then calculate how much CO2 plants are absorbing.

The study provides the first truly global estimate of the amount of CO2 that plants “fix” into their tissues like leaves in response to increasing concentrations of the gas over the past century. Montzka says that tracking COS will help scientists monitor how much carbon land plants are removing from the atmosphere as CO2 levels increase.

“These results will help us better predict the biosphere’s response to continued fossil fuel emissions – and ultimately improve our predictions of climate change.”

Read more about this study in the journal Nature.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Food; Gardening; Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 07/26/2023 2:29:41 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Well, for now, until this administration blocks the sun.


2 posted on 07/26/2023 2:30:42 PM PDT by rey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

shocking


3 posted on 07/26/2023 2:32:43 PM PDT by mylife (I was a sort of country boy, a cockeyed optimist, wrapped in international intrigue and espionage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; pookie18

4 posted on 07/26/2023 2:33:23 PM PDT by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tell It Right

Thanks, Tell It Right!


5 posted on 07/26/2023 2:40:35 PM PDT by pookie18 (You don’t have to be high on crack to enjoy Pookie’s Toons! - Tell It Right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Dear liberals:

Look up the word “homeostasis”.

CC


6 posted on 07/26/2023 2:42:42 PM PDT by Celtic Conservative (My cats are more amusing than 200 channels worth of TV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative

Photosynthesis might be another word liberals need to be familiar with. Ask them where oxygen come from. Is it from carbon dioxide or water? The don’t have a clue.


7 posted on 07/26/2023 2:45:00 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

The world is just now starting to come out of thousands of years of CO2 drought.


8 posted on 07/26/2023 2:50:28 PM PDT by taxcontrol (The choice is clear - either live as a slave on your knees or die as a free citizen on your feet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

And guess what...those plants feed today’s population which is a tad more than in 1900.


9 posted on 07/26/2023 2:51:40 PM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/world-population-by-year/


10 posted on 07/26/2023 2:58:30 PM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

There must be a correlation between co2 and population. A greater population demands more co2.


11 posted on 07/26/2023 2:59:34 PM PDT by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Plant also tend to like warmer weather to as long as they have water. At least I think common food plants are like that.


12 posted on 07/26/2023 3:51:40 PM PDT by Fai Mao (Starve the beast and steal its food!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

50% to 70% of a plant’s non water mass becomes CO2 after it dies and decomposes. So you’re actually leading to global warming by having more plants, if you follow their logic.

It’s really ridiculous. Think of the billions of trees, weeds, algae, insects that will all eventually convert into CO2 eventually. This is a lot more CO2 than our cars put into the air.


13 posted on 07/26/2023 4:19:45 PM PDT by MNDude (Once you remove "they would never" from your Trump shared a post on soci it all begins to make sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Any one with any plant science background knows the more c02, the more plant growth.

In fact they are two pathways of photosynthesis. One is a higher energy requirement to capture c02 under low concentrations. The more efficient one is used in high c02 concentrations.


14 posted on 07/26/2023 5:24:16 PM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

OH NO, We will be awash in dihodrogen monoxide.


15 posted on 07/26/2023 6:04:10 PM PDT by oldasrocks (uit )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

Plants also release oxygen into the atmosphere through photosynthesis. Oxygen is good.


16 posted on 07/27/2023 1:53:13 AM PDT by jonrick46 (Leftniks chase illusions of motherships at the end of the pier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson