Posted on 07/12/2023 5:24:14 AM PDT by Red Badger
KEY POINTS
Jeff Bezos’ space company Blue Origin suffered a rocket engine explosion while testing its BE-4 rocket engine last month, CNBC has learned.
During a firing on June 30 at Blue Origin’s facility in West Texas, a BE-4 engine detonated about 10 seconds into the test.
A Blue Origin spokesperson confirmed the incident, noting no personnel were injured and an investigation is underway, with a “proximate cause” identified.
===============================================================
A Blue Origin rocket engine exploded during testing last month, CNBC has learned, a destructive setback with potential ramifications for the company’s customers and its own rocket.
During a firing on June 30 at a West Texas facility of Jeff Bezos’ space company, a BE-4 engine detonated about 10 seconds into the test, according to several people familiar with the matter. Those people described having seen video of a dramatic explosion that destroyed the engine and heavily damaged the test stand infrastructure.
The people spoke to CNBC on the condition of anonymity to discuss nonpublic matters.
The engine that exploded was expected to finish testing in July. It was then scheduled to ship to Blue Origin’s customer United Launch Alliance for use on ULA’s second Vulcan rocket launch, those people said.
A Blue Origin spokesperson, in a statement to CNBC on Tuesday, confirmed the company “ran into an issue while testing Vulcan’s Flight Engine 3.”
“No personnel were injured and we are currently assessing root cause,” Blue Origin said, adding “we already have proximate cause and are working on remedial actions.”
The company noted it “immediately” made its customer ULA aware of the incident. ULA is the rocket-building joint venture of Boeing and Lockheed Martin , which competes primarily with Elon Musk’s SpaceX, especially going head-to-head over the most lucrative military launch contracts.
Blue Origin also said it will be able to “continue testing” engines in West Texas. The company previously built two stands for the tests.
“We will be able to meet our engine delivery commitments this year and stay ahead of our customer’s launch needs,” Blue Origin added.
Vulcan delays BE-4′s test failure threatens to further push back the already-delayed first Vulcan launch — which was recently rescheduled to the fourth quarter of this year — while Blue Origin examines the cause of the problem.
Each Vulcan rocket uses a pair of BE-4 engines to launch. ULA waited anxiously for years to receive delivery of the first set. A month ago, ULA completed a key milestone in preparation for the first Vulcan launch, known as Cert-1, with a short static fire test of the rocket using the first pair of BE-4 flight engines.
In a statement to CNBC, a ULA spokesperson said, “The BE-4 testing issue is not expected to impact our plans for the Vulcan Cert-1 mission.” The company noted that the engines for Cert-1 “successfully passed acceptance testing” and are qualified to launch.
As ULA’s Cert mission name implies, the company needs to launch two Vulcans successfully to complete the U.S. Space Force’s certification of the rocket for operational flights. With ULA set to retire its currently operational rockets, Atlas V and Delta IV Heavy, the company needs Vulcan to be certified as soon as possible to begin flying national security missions.
Last month, Space Force assigned SpaceX and ULA each with six missions under the National Security Space Launch Phase 2 program. All six of ULA’s NSSL missions are set to fly on Vulcan. Additionally, ULA is preparing to bid for Phase 3 contracts under NSSL, with the Space Force welcoming heightened competition.
Blue Origin’s BE-4 incident comes after ULA spent three months investigating its own test explosion. In March, a separate part of the rocket, known as the upper stage, exploded during a structural test and required ULA to partially disassemble the first Vulcan rocket to reinforce the upper stage that was already installed.
While ULA determined the problem would be fairly easy to fix, it is now testing a change to the thickness of the upper stage’s steel walls to ensure the solution is sufficient before the company reinstalls an improved version.
Blue Origin’s New Glenn At the same time that Blue Origin needs to get BE-4 working well and humming off the production line for its main customer, the company also needs the engines for its own reusable New Glenn rocket that’s in development.
While Vulcan uses two BE-4 engines, each New Glenn rocket requires seven BE-4 engines, meaning Blue Origin needs to produce dozens a year to support both rockets.
Vulcan and New Glenn are both under contract to fly satellites for another Bezos-founded company, Amazon . The blockbuster commercial launch deal saw Amazon order 38 Vulcan launches and up to 27 New Glenn launches to fly its Project Kuiper internet satellites over the next few years.
Blue Origin also plans to use New Glenn to fly the lunar lander it’s developing under a $3.4 billion NASA contract.
BE-4, the centerpiece of Blue Origin’s stable of rocket engines, was supposed to be ready by 2017, but a myriad of development issues has meant the company only finished the first flight-ready engines recently.
Similarly, New Glenn was originally slated for its inaugural flight in 2020. But delays have changed that timeline to unknown, with Blue Origin leadership in recent public appearances declining to comment on a new debut launch target for New Glenn.
Blue Origin opened a major engine production factory in Huntsville, Alabama, in 2020, and has expanded its facilities in the area to about 1 million square feet. NASA leased engine test stands at the Marshall Space Flight Center to Blue Origin. The company tests its smaller BE-7 lunar lander engine there, while restoring a larger NASA stand for BE-4 testing at its testing facility in Texas.
A lot of people on this forum can't grasp that concept, either.
SpaceX launches more than once per week. They have more successful launches this year than the rest of the world combined.
No ... Competition is good.
Airlines generally have a choice of GE, P&W or R-R engines for their aircraft. This is a good thing, keeps all the engine manufacturers on their toes.
I want to see Vulcan succeed with the Blue Origin engine.
Is their engine uniquely different from the rptor?
I am not familiar with the differences
Yes - competition is good. But after a while everyone can settle on the best mousetrap, and not spend tons of money for minimal gain.
Town named West. North central Texas. SE of Dallas I think.
From the late 1950s, there were the Vanguard and Redstone rockets that exploded at or shortly after launch, many of which we got to see on TV in real time.
West Texas is also Wolfcamp and No Trees and Delaware.
I used to live in Midland.
The article was confusing.
Is “Blue Origin” in West Texas or West, Texas?
But West Texas is only about 65 miles south of Dallas.
West TX 76991
Location of fertilizer explosion that killed many.
That’s why the media should have said “Bezos penis rocket engine exploded in Midland, in west Texas.”
Not West Texas.
Capitalization has meaning.
It’s a shame he wasn’t in it
BTW, what the heck are they doing it there for?
The grass/weeds are so dry, it is like gasoline over there.
Yes, it is not as good.
It is my understanding that the Raptor and other SpaceX designs are the most efficient and highest thrust producing rocket engines in existence currently.
I don't think anyone else comes close to SpaceX designs in terms of efficiency or thrust produced for a given size.
The Midland area is so dry that nothing grows on the soil. What little grows can be easily graded away for fireproof testing areas. If you want something to grow out there, you have to water it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.