Posted on 06/28/2023 5:59:38 AM PDT by MtnClimber
In April 2021, Adele Fox received a single shot of the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine. Within a few hours, the 60-year-old resident of Portsmouth, New Hampshire, started feeling shooting pains in her legs, arms, and neck. The pain didn’t abate over the next few days. Instead, it got worse and was accompanied by nausea and debilitating fatigue.
Within a few weeks, neurologists affiliated with Massachusetts General Hospital diagnosed her with several serious conditions they say were a result of her COVID-19 vaccine, including small-fiber neuropathy (which causes a painful tingling in the extremities) and Sjögren’s Syndrome (which leaves patients pained and fatigued, and in extreme cases, can damage internal organs).
This shot, which was supposed to get Fox back to normal, instead left her with diminished ability to work and enjoy life. Persistent physical therapy and experimental treatments she’s taken since have done little to alleviate her symptoms.
“I used to do so much, and now it’s a struggle,” she says. “Sometimes you just get down.”
With her medical bills mounting and her condition not improving, Fox sought compensation for her damaged health. Federal liability protections prevent the vaccine-injured from directly suing vaccine manufacturers like Johnson & Johnson. Instead, claimants have to go to the federal government for compensation.
But as Fox would soon learn, the government has two starkly different injury programs for vaccines. One operates like a civil court with a neutral judge, lawyers on both sides, and a guaranteed right of appeal. In recent decades, it has approved about 75% of claims and pays out hundreds of millions of dollars per year.
The other, which handles COVID-19 vaccines, has rejected almost every claim brought to it, awarding less than $10,000 since the pandemic. And in a nation nearly numb to the pandemic's toll and its scandals, the program is adding seething frustration atop lasting injury to Fox and people like her in a little reported aftermath to the government’s much criticized performance on vaccines – ranging from erratic booster advice to broad-brush vaccine mandates that cost people their jobs.
Fox filed her claim two years ago, submitting hundreds of pages of medical documents about her condition and diagnoses. She’s nevertheless one of the 10,887 people still waiting on a decision. “You’re not even hearing anything from the organization that’s supposed be helping you,” she says. “The phone keeps ringing, no one is emailing, nobody is doing anything.”
There should be consequences for government officials and corporations that forced VAX compliance. They should not get away with this.
Liberalism is so caring. /s
If her employer mandated a COVID vaccine, then she should be looking to sue them out of existence.
If she just bought into the Branch Covidian hysteria on her own, then I'd say she should consider this a sobering lesson to learn.
“”This shot, which was supposed to get Fox back to normal””
I don’t understand that statement. Back to normal from WHAT? It supposedly was the shot for Covid but what else?
Then she should sue J&J for a defective product since it was so loudly proclaimed to be safe and effective. She must have received a mis-manufactured dose...hint, hint.
EC
Sjogren’s syndrome is an autoimmune disease. These are genetic defects in the immune system that can be activated by vaccinces. Or viruses. Or common things like ibuprofen. I live with one of them.
This shot was tested like the ocean gate sub was tested. Why any rational person would trust either I can’t fathom.
“Federal liability protections prevent the vaccine-injured from directly suing vaccine manufacturers like Johnson & Johnson”
No lawyer would take her case. The Federal government gave protection to the Pharma companies to rush the covid vaccines into production without the typical years long trials.
Yep, and she took the vaccine before it was “approved” by the FDA. So she agreed to be a human test subject in a medical experiment, which I expect limits her avenues for legal action quite a bit.
Yes, I know the government and pharma companies did not receive proper informed consent, so the waiver of her rights was likely invalid, but good luck getting any court to agree to that point of fact.
Not just to Big Pharma.
To the pre-approved federally registered vaccinators.
Not just anyone could offer a CoupFlu vaxx, you know.
And every single sodding one of them has immunity, too.
The government can’t have payouts, or it won’t look like it was “safe.”
Of course, they removed J&J from the market, because it wasn’t safe.
Good luck to her and anyone else harmed by a Covid Vaccine.
BY Debbie Lerman: DEBBIE LERMAN NOVEMBER 3, 2022 GOVERNMENT, POLICY, PUBLIC HEALTH 11 MINUTE READ
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL
In previous articles I,DEBBIE LERMAN, discussed the probability that Deborah Birx, the White House Coronoavirus Task Force Coordinator, was not a representative of the public health agencies but, rather, was appointed by the National Security Council. I now have proof that this was, indeed, the case. I have also uncovered documents that show:
As of March 13, 2020 the National Security Council (NSC) was officially in charge of the US government’s Covid policy.
Starting on March 18, 2020, The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), under the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), was officially in charge of the US government’s Covid response.
The Covid Task Force Coordinator was brought in by the NSC
On March 11, 2020, at a Heritage Foundation Talk, Trump’s National Security Advisor, Robert O’Brien, when discussing what the White House and NSC were doing about the virus, said:
“We brought into the White House Debi Birx, a fantastic physician and ambassador from the State Department. We appreciate Secretary Pompeo immediately moving her over to the White House at our, well at the President’s, request.” (min. 21:43 – 21:56)
The National Security Council was in charge of our Covid Policy:
An astonishing government document dated March 13, 2020 entitled: “PanCAP Adapted U.S. Government COVID-19 Response Plan” (PanCAP-A) (embedded at the end of this piece) reveals that United States policy in response to SARS-CoV-2 was set not by the public health agencies designated in pandemic preparedness protocols (Pandemic and All Hazards Preparedness Act, PPD-44, BIA), but rather by the National Security Council, or NSC.
This is the pandemic response org chart, from p. 9 of PanCAP-A, showing the NSC solely responsible for Covid policy:
BROWNSTONE » BROWNSTONE INSTITUTE ARTICLES » GOVERNMENT’S NATIONAL SECURITY ARM TOOK CHARGE DURING THE COVID RESPONSE
https://brownstone.org/articles/governments-national-security-arm-led-the-covid-response/
Had she been supplied with accurate information which gave her informed consent, I would say she was on her own. But she was the target of a trillion dollar world-wide ad campaign and defrauded by the medical community and government - no informed consent was given. She was not told of the known side effects during the trials. She was lied to about Covid to make it seem worse than it was. Her tax dollars at work.
Nuremberg Trials established the ethical requirement for informed consent to prevent experimentation on people.
Late in the game they were playing, the FDA and CDC did a bait-and-switch in which the FDA ‘approved’ one of the Covid vaccines and employers/military then said -”Well, it’s no longer experimental, so get the vax!” Ah but all who did get the vax were given the experimental vax, as the ‘vaccine’ manufacturer had no intention of producing the ‘approved’ version because THAT version would hold liability.
This farce were in pits the citizen against the abusive government and gov resources (lawyers, laws, fake medical studies) paid for, by the citizen.
“No lawyer would take her case. The Federal government gave protection to the Pharma companies to rush the covid vaccines into production without the typical years long trials.”
That had nothing to do with Covid and there’s other vaccines that don’t have “years long trials”.
The federal goverment gave lawsuit protection to vaccine makers in 1986 long before Covid showed up.
They created the National Vaccine Compensation Program to address vaccine injuries.
https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccine-compensation
“but all who did get the vax were given the experimental vax, as the ‘vaccine’ manufacturer had no intention of producing the ‘approved’ version because THAT version would hold liability.”
That fake claim has sure been one of your favorites. Never gets old I guess. Was that something that those crackpots at the defunct Daily Expose cooked up, like magnets sticking to arms?
The EUA vaccine and the approved vaccine are identical, only the name changed.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Laid Low by the COVID Vaccine, Now They've Got a Bad Case of Federal Unresponsiveness, Pelham wrote: |
“but all who did get the vax were given the experimental vax, as the ‘vaccine’ manufacturer had no intention of producing the ‘approved’ version because THAT version would hold liability.” That fake claim has sure been one of your favorites. Never gets old I guess. Was that something that those crackpots at the defunct Daily Expose cooked up, like magnets sticking to arms? The EUA vaccine and the approved vaccine are identical, only the name changed. |
Yes the contents were identical. The bait-and-switch was about liability, not contents. Military and civilians said they would not take an experimental vaccine (experimental contents and liability free) so pharma and FDA pushed through an approved version, stripping people of that objection and they (FDA, CDC, trolls on FR) were proud of it.
So then those forced by military or workplace mandates were given the experimental vax contents they should have been permitted to avoid given lack of sufficient safety testing/duration, but without the liability coverage of the approved version the FDA publicized. They were swindled, lied to deceived, etc. yet again.
When you don't understand something you post to me like I have made an error. It's not my error; it's just your failure to comprehend.
“The bait-and-switch was about liability”
The stream of conspiracy fantasy that you believe about Covid vaccines does have an odd entertainent value. And this is one more deluded theory, although it lacks the elan of your old pals at the Daily Expose clown show.
The vaccine makers weren’t liable. The vaccine acts of 1986 and 1988 handed liability over to government programs. Most vaccines are covered by the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. Covid vaccines were and maybe still are covered by the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program. A pity. The liability theory had so much promise.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.