Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/28/2023 5:59:38 AM PDT by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MtnClimber

There should be consequences for government officials and corporations that forced VAX compliance. They should not get away with this.


2 posted on 06/28/2023 5:59:49 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Liberalism is so caring. /s


3 posted on 06/28/2023 6:19:40 AM PDT by Track9 (You are far too inquisitive not to be seduced…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Then she should sue J&J for a defective product since it was so loudly proclaimed to be safe and effective. She must have received a mis-manufactured dose...hint, hint.

EC


6 posted on 06/28/2023 6:29:46 AM PDT by Ex-Con777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Sjogren’s syndrome is an autoimmune disease. These are genetic defects in the immune system that can be activated by vaccinces. Or viruses. Or common things like ibuprofen. I live with one of them.


7 posted on 06/28/2023 7:00:46 AM PDT by Pelham (President Eisenhower. Operation Wetback 1953-54)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

This shot was tested like the ocean gate sub was tested. Why any rational person would trust either I can’t fathom.


8 posted on 06/28/2023 7:36:07 AM PDT by TalBlack (We have a Christian duty and a patriotic duty. God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

The government can’t have payouts, or it won’t look like it was “safe.”

Of course, they removed J&J from the market, because it wasn’t safe.


13 posted on 06/28/2023 8:33:36 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Good luck to her and anyone else harmed by a Covid Vaccine.


Government’s National Security Arm Took Charge During the Covid Response

BY Debbie Lerman: DEBBIE LERMAN NOVEMBER 3, 2022 GOVERNMENT, POLICY, PUBLIC HEALTH 11 MINUTE READ
SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL

In previous articles I,DEBBIE LERMAN, discussed the probability that Deborah Birx, the White House Coronoavirus Task Force Coordinator, was not a representative of the public health agencies but, rather, was appointed by the National Security Council. I now have proof that this was, indeed, the case. I have also uncovered documents that show:

As of March 13, 2020 the National Security Council (NSC) was officially in charge of the US government’s Covid policy.

Starting on March 18, 2020, The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), under the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), was officially in charge of the US government’s Covid response.

The Covid Task Force Coordinator was brought in by the NSC
On March 11, 2020, at a Heritage Foundation Talk, Trump’s National Security Advisor, Robert O’Brien, when discussing what the White House and NSC were doing about the virus, said:

“We brought into the White House Debi Birx, a fantastic physician and ambassador from the State Department. We appreciate Secretary Pompeo immediately moving her over to the White House at our, well at the President’s, request.” (min. 21:43 – 21:56)

The National Security Council was in charge of our Covid Policy:

An astonishing government document dated March 13, 2020 entitled: “PanCAP Adapted U.S. Government COVID-19 Response Plan” (PanCAP-A) (embedded at the end of this piece) reveals that United States policy in response to SARS-CoV-2 was set not by the public health agencies designated in pandemic preparedness protocols (Pandemic and All Hazards Preparedness Act, PPD-44, BIA), but rather by the National Security Council, or NSC.

This is the pandemic response org chart, from p. 9 of PanCAP-A, showing the NSC solely responsible for Covid policy:

BROWNSTONE » BROWNSTONE INSTITUTE ARTICLES » GOVERNMENT’S NATIONAL SECURITY ARM TOOK CHARGE DURING THE COVID RESPONSE

https://brownstone.org/articles/governments-national-security-arm-led-the-covid-response/


14 posted on 06/28/2023 10:01:42 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (We have no shortage of experts, stating things as fact, and have no idea nor reality re solutions!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Had she been supplied with accurate information which gave her informed consent, I would say she was on her own. But she was the target of a trillion dollar world-wide ad campaign and defrauded by the medical community and government - no informed consent was given. She was not told of the known side effects during the trials. She was lied to about Covid to make it seem worse than it was. Her tax dollars at work.

Nuremberg Trials established the ethical requirement for informed consent to prevent experimentation on people.

Late in the game they were playing, the FDA and CDC did a bait-and-switch in which the FDA ‘approved’ one of the Covid vaccines and employers/military then said -”Well, it’s no longer experimental, so get the vax!” Ah but all who did get the vax were given the experimental vax, as the ‘vaccine’ manufacturer had no intention of producing the ‘approved’ version because THAT version would hold liability.

This farce were in pits the citizen against the abusive government and gov resources (lawyers, laws, fake medical studies) paid for, by the citizen.


15 posted on 06/28/2023 10:50:13 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson