He who rides the tiger dare not dismount.
Queers not going to drink queer beer?
HA-HA!
LOL, now they’ve pi$$ed off eerybody!
bye
So, if we now boycott Bud Light, are we now boycotting the alphabet people boycott? Or are we boycotting the original Bud Light support of the alphabet people?
Can this get any more confusing?
Bwahahaha!!
Bet they ain’t too happy they hired the former publicity chick about now. Ain’t no takin’ it back. Losing on both ends now. Wonder what the monetary damage will be due to her inclusiveness .🤑
They’ll shut up as soon as somebody reminds them it makes them our allies in this. Anyway, it’s 0.0001% of the market, so who cares?
Excellent!
Friendly fire can be as deadly as any other.
The important thing: break this company into little pieces and make an impression on others that are tempted to flirt with Satan.
Looks like A-B managed to p*ss off everybody ........
"Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)"
If liberals don’t support sex with children, why are they punishing Bud Light for abandoning its campaign to promote that?
Try to please everyone, and you’ll please no one.
lmao... let us behold the text book example of the term double edged sword!!
If I were head of marketing for a large corporation I would not think of associating my product with cultural shifts of the day. Why alienate customers?
Now, it seems apparent that large corporations are beholden to those who regulate them. If there is a necessary “wall of separation,” it should be between business and congress except where matter of general, genuine safety are concerned.
Obama is seething
He that straddles the fence gets a picket in the crotch.
Pandering is not only bad business, but stupid.
Anti-anti boycott. That works even better than the original boycott.