This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 05/01/2023 7:11:25 PM PDT by Jim Robinson, reason:
9/11 truther conspiracy not welcome on FR |
Posted on 04/30/2023 6:05:30 PM PDT by RandFan
@nomandatesco
Tucker talks 9/11– What happened to building 7?????
Clip ...
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Maybe some deep state operative slipped LSD into his water bottle. It’s happened before.
I guess you still think 4 rag heads per plane were able to scare over 300 people per plane into doing nothing with just box cutters as weapons?
By the time people are done playing The Telephone Game on his tweet, the news will be
‘Have you heard? Tucker is buying a franchise in Bldg. #9, and opening a 711 Conveniance Store. Everybody’s talking about it !!”
Related to this —
Freedom of Speech is meaningless if the only thing you say is what the Powerful People want you to say. There is no real freedom in that.
Freedom of speech means something when you say things that get you into trouble.
What can’t you say?
What questions can’t you ask?
That’s where all the really important stuff can be found.
Building 7 is like the Las Vegas massacre. Nothing to see here, move along....
Some unusual events are due to conspiracies, and some are not.
Which plane had over 300 people?
He can invite Rosie O’Donnell.
“I do believe that it’s the first time in history that fire has ever melted steel. I do believe that it defies physics that World Trade Center tower 7—building 7, which collapsed in on itself—it is impossible for a building to fall the way it fell without explosives being involved. World Trade Center 7. World Trade [Center] 1 and 2 got hit by planes—7, miraculously, the first time in history, steel was melted by fire. It is physically impossible.”
Crap like this is why I can’t get into Tucker.
LSD and maybe even some need for clicks..
Wasn’t building 7 bent from the falling debris of the north tower then collapsed well afterwards. It’s easy for people to make stuff up so many years later.
Because when it becomes obvious someone is willfully blind to the answers, asking the same questions and ignoring the answers about 9/11 marks a person as willfully ignorant. The studies and reports on WTC 7's collapse started in 2002, the NIST published its final report in 2008. In Tucker's case, along with every other big name TV journalist, after all this time after 9/11 they should already know those answers. If they don't like them, then should have some specific rebuttal other than a vague I don't get it, so there must be something there.
Tucker is talking with Clayton Morris who fled the country to avoid real estate lawsuits. Something about known by the company you keep comes to mind.
Building Seven was built using the steel beams and girders transferred the weight throughout the entire structure. Steel has two properties when it heats up, before it melts. When steel heats up, it gradually loses strength and expands. This why thermal expansion can buckle railroad tracks.
(Am I one of the few Americans left who ever watched a blacksmith heat metal red hot and understood what was happening?)
After the twin towers collapsed, 20 floors in WTC 7 caught fire simultaneously. There was no water pressure left to run the fire suppression system. When WTC 7 was designed no one was designing buildings to have over 20 floors catch fire like that. The steel across all those floors were heating up, losing their individual strength, expanding and putting pressure on surrounding members.
The result was, in simple terms, WTC 7 popped like a balloon.
BBC reports on Building 7 collapse 20 minutes before Building 7 collapses
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M26-B44qQIs&ab_channel=ichabodsmith
I remember watching a documentary in HS drafting class. It was all about the time and effort involved in getting a building to collapse in on itself.
How many of you have seen the female newscaster who said Bldg 7 had collapsed and her in studio partner points out that it’s right behind her in live camera view and still standing?
I remember that. How the hell did that happen?
AA Flight 11: 92 passengers and crew
UA Flight 175: 65
AA Flight 77: 64
UA Flight 93: 44
I saw that video.
I also remember hearing on the day that “we’re going to have to bring that building down.”
These things are just not possible.
See post #13.
They simply got a little ahead of the timing on the scripts they were reading.
Bkmk
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.