Posted on 02/26/2023 10:13:28 AM PST by ransomnote
This is why the CDC has NEVER used the Medicare data to prove the vaccines are safe. And this is why NOBODY in mainstream medicine wants you to see this data. EVER. They ALL want it hidden. FOREVER.
15 hr agoNota Bene
This may well be the most important article I’ll write in 2023.
In this article, I publicly reveal record-level vax-death data from the “gold standard” Medicare database that proves that:
The vaccines are making it more likely that the elderly will die prematurely, not less likely
The risk of death remains elevated for an unknown period of time after you get the shot (we didn’t see it return to normal)
The CDC lied to the American people about the safety of these vaccines. They had access to this data the entire time and kept it hidden and said nothing.
If there is one article for you to share with your social network, this is the one.
Executive summary
Isn’t it a shame that none of the world’s governments make the vaccination-death records publicly available? My claim is that if they did that, it would end the debate instantly and prove to the world that the vaccines are unsafe. So that’s why they keep it locked up.
But apparently there is one whistleblower who is interested in data transparency.
Last night, I got a USB drive in my mailbox with the Medicare data that links deaths and vaccination dates. Finally! This is the data that nobody wants to talk or even ask about.
I was able to authenticate the data by matching it with records I already had. And the analysis that I did on the data I received matches up with other analyses I have received previously.
The nice thing about this Medicare data is that nobody can claim that it is “unreliable.” Medicare is the unassailable “gold-standard” database. It’s the database that the CDC never wants us to see for some reason. They never even mention it. They pretend it doesn’t exist. So you know it is important.
Do you want to know what it shows?
It shows that these shots increase your risk of dying and once you get shot, your risk of dying remains elevated for an unknown amount of time. And that’s in the very population it is supposed to help the most!
Now you know why the CDC, which has always had access to the Medicare records, has never made them publicly available for anyone to analyze to prove that the vaccines are safe. Because the records show the opposite. That’s why they keep the data hidden from view and it’s why they NEVER talk about it.
Today, in this article, you will finally get to see what nobody outside the HHS has ever seen before: the “gold standard” Medicare records, i.e., the truth. You can analyze it yourself.
MORE AT LINK: GAME OVER: Medicare data shows the COVID vaccines increase your chance of dying
So glad I remained a pureblood and resisted all attempts to force this experimental drug on me.
The ensuing slew of comments refuting anything they don’t want to believe are always entertaining and disappointing of human nature.
Denial and don’t publish data. Both surefire means of deception.
First vaccination will protect against infection, when that doesn’t work it will help you survive infection, it is safe and effective, when that isn’t true cloud the truth and press on in denial.
When the “disinformation” is true, ignore it or grasp for old and contrary information and a new round of lies.
Priceless.
No kidding! 🙄
Bookmarked
True. It would not. The jab is certainly dangerous.
Ransomnote, thanks for spreading more nonsense from George Costanza aka Steve Kirsch. The spreadsheet Steve is so proud of is unintelligible. He has 4 graphs. If you ever got through 8th grade math, you know that a graph has an X axis and a Y axis. The cool think about graphs is that is shows the relationship between the category on the X axis and the category on the Y axis. in this case Steve provides graphs that HAVE NO LABELS ON THE X AXIS OR THE Y AXIS!! If I presented this graph at my job I would be fired on the spot. Stop wasting our time Steve! Or at least learn how to make a graph in Excel. If you are so smart you know all about vaccine risk, why can’t you figure out how to make a graph?
Your effort to try muddy the waters, fails miserably, at this juncture.
hey brookwood...
thanks for proving your an idiot...
“.but still its not certain that it has a negative net affect”
Will ANYTHING convince you?
Who am I to criticize your religion?
My wife and I also believe it increases Dementia. Her mom was diagnosed with minor Dementia but got jabbed twice. Don’t know about a booster.
It got progressively worse and within a year we had to put her in a home.
She told her not to get jabbed but we lost that argument because she was 86. Now she’s practically a vegetable.
Me too. I was even uninvited to Christmas 2021 at my Sister’s because I refused the shot.
My husband died suddenly of an emobolism in October. We got both Moderna shots (I did for him to protect him as he was immune compromised for last 3 years) various medical issues. Had a strong strong heart. Anyways, went to Dr visit and they talked him into booster and flu shot at same time. Just read they are now saying not to get both at same time as sudden death and Ischemic strokes are happening. He died suddenly 9 days after the shots. Yeah, bit too late. I tried to tell him not to take boosters but he was so scared he die if he got COVID. We never got COVID. I could just scream and cry over his decision to get the shots that day.
Anti-vaxxers at fault since they’re not dying as fast.
Was saying mere correlation is not sufficient to conclude it has an overall negative effect. If you read the rest of my sentence you quoted you might have noticed it said:
...if we are just talking about a correlation.
As far as what I am convinced of on other grounds the jabs are a net negative overall and its not even close. Their effectiveness is dubious and keeps getting estimated down by reality from their lofty pretensions of being near 100% that ostensibly was the result of the clinical studies that it is difficult to get data on (and required legal action to get and still is slow walked to the public). The effectiveness (to whatever degree it does exist if any) is said to wane in a few months anyway (and thus the "need "for new boosters are dynamically discovered in real time). Overall this does not qualify as a vaccine obviously since it does not make one immune (thus the Orwellian change to the meaning of "vaccine" used by FDA etc ). As to its side effects the VAERs data exploded with reported adverse effects including deaths compared to former years, so obviously it is dangerous in the short term. Moreover we have no long term data and it may be very dangerous in the long term as far as we know.
Add to that the obscenity of coercing people to get the dangerous and likely useless (and at best of questionable benefit) jabs is simply obscene. And as a result has undermined trust in the CDC and FDA and other authorities pushing this garbage.
My gosh....you are STILL here, defending these dangerous $hots??
Why???
Did you take the jabs, and, are fearful? Do you work for BigPharma or a jab affiliated holding company?
This is sad, and, terrible.
I am so sorry.
They put such fear into so many.
🙄
If you ever made it through SIXTH grade English, you know to check your work, for any spelling, or, grammatical errors, before criticizing someone else’s work.
Sheesh.
Troll.
Try this: https://www.biznews.com/health/2023/01/16/sudden-death-athletes - half way down is a chart that essentially matches what an insurance actuary told me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.