Posted on 02/24/2023 8:12:31 AM PST by OKSooner
According to new provisional data from the Scottish government, there were 7,314 deaths registered in January 2023, an increase of 17.7% compared to the average of 6,212. For the second week of January, there were more deaths in Scotland than ever before, including during the peak of the pandemic. Concurrently, there were 4,159 births registered in January 2023, a decrease of 6.8% compared to the average of 4,463. In other words, between a dearth of births and a plethora of deaths, there were roughly 1,400 fewer souls, the equivalent of roughly 86,000 in the United States. This is long after COVID. Why is there zero concern?
What on earth will it take to pull these death shots from the market?
Die Welt, a paper based in the home country of Pfizer partner BioNTech, revealed last week in a long expose what many of us have long known. All those sudden deaths, heart attacks, and strokes we’ve been witnessing over the past two years were indeed observed during the Pfizer clinical trial that supposedly showed the shots to be 100% safe and effective. The company simply covered up the severe adverse events by kicking those participants out of the trial and/or suggesting without evidence that the deaths had nothing to do with the experiment.
Remember, the CDC announced a few weeks ago that it had finally study a potential association between the COVID shots and strokes. Well, it turns out the agency had the opportunity to study it already in 2020 before a single human being outside the trial was injected. “Patient no. 11621327” was more than a mere number. He was a human being found dead from a stroke in his apartment just three days after the second dose. Typically, with a novel product in trial, any death – even one not so sudden – makes the product suspect until it is proven innocent. Yet in this case, Pfizer simply dismissed the death as not related to the vaccine, just as the company did with Patient #11521497, who died 20 days later from cardiac arrest.
The article also provides more details on the Buenos Aires trial site, the largest one in the world, in which attorney Augusto Roux was severely injured with pericarditis and liver damage. Instead of being recorded as a severe adverse event, he was marked as having had COVID (even though he tested negative) and was summarily removed from the trial. Roux was on my podcast last July and told me Pfizer refused to help treat his injury because officials felt it had nothing to do with the vaccine, and insurance also refused to pay for treatment because the insurance company blamed it on him willingly joining the trial.
Die Welt reports that on Aug. 31, 2020, 53 of those in the trial in Buenos Aires were unblinded and removed from the trial against the protocol, which calls for this only “in emergencies” (unless this was indeed an emergency!). By the end of the second dose, a further 200 individuals were removed from the trial, meaning that overall, more than 250 of the original 1231 participants were terminated, thereby making the entirety of the data from the largest trial site irrelevant to use in the final trial results.
Overall, 21 participants in Pfizer’s phase 3 trial died, as compared to 17 in the control group before they were unblinded, which should have been a red flag before the shot ever took off. Pfizer claimed there was no evidence anyone died from the vaccine, but after it’s been revealed that a number of people in the trial suffered heart ailments and strokes, the company’s defense holds no water. Yet here we are, over two years later, and the shots are still on the market, promoted like manna from heaven, and even mandated in most hospitals and universities, including in red states. How is this not the top public policy issue of our day?
Consider the following from a public policy standpoint. Pfizer gets the government to pony up billions in taxpayer dollars for the shots, several billion more to promote, advertise, distribute, and mandate them on every human being alive – all while absolving Pfizer of liability. So how do we know the shots are safe? Who gets to monitor the clinical trial? The very manufacturer that was absolved of liability by the government! The Die Welt article even mentions that Pfizer pushed through a liability waiver on its contract not just for negligence, but also for "fraud or bad faith on the part of Pfizer itself."
Pfizer responded to the Die Welt reporter by asserting that, “Regulatory authorities around the world have approved our Covid-19 vaccine. These approvals are based on a robust and independent assessment of the scientific data on quality, safety, and efficacy, including the phase 3 clinical trial.” Sure, authorities guaranteed the company endless funding, marketing, mandates, and indemnity so that Pfizer would have no incentive to even release the true results of its trial, much less make the product better.
How can this continue to go on after all we know?
Yet in all honesty, this year’s legislative sessions in red states have been an utter disgrace – with medical freedom not even being on the back burner of policy issues. The few brave legislators who seek to impose some sort of accountability on the state departments of health for promoting and mandating these shots are summarily shouted down. Florida is the only state where officials are holding Pfizer accountable with the convening of a grand jury. Just last week, the Florida Department of Health sent an alert to doctors warning them to inform anyone inquiring about the COVID shots about the adverse events reported to the CDC’s VAERS. Where are the other red states? Why is Ron DeSantis the only governor who values the Nuremberg Code?
What is it going to take to give this issue the prominence it deserves so that the policies and laws reflect the human toll these odious policies have taken on humanity? How many more people need to die for a lie? Remember, a study from Thailand showed that 29% of young males in the study sample suffered some form of subclinical heart damage whether they experienced symptoms or not. We have potentially hundreds of millions of people in the world who are ticking time bombs and in need of the best research, diagnostics, and treatment.
Amid all the existential threats to our security, civilization, culture, and economy – and there are certainly many – can you think of anything that matches the severity of this issue? From died suddenly to plummeting birth rates, how is the vaccine issue not the top concern of all public policy, given that it was injected in 5.5 billion people and officials are on the cusp of approving more mRNAs? So we’re now supposed to believe Moderna’s own published phase 3 trial results of its RSV shot that it’s 84% effective and absolutely no serious adverse events occurred? Within months, if we don’t stop it, this shot will be in the arms of every senior and then, eventually, in the arms of every newborn baby.
After Pfizer purposely fabricated its clinical trial, the company must now be on the hook for a different sort of trial – one Steve Deace and I lay out in “Rise of the Fourth Reich.” Unless we begin holding pharma companies accountable and erecting legal firewalls to protect the people from their endless experimentation, they will do this again and again.
Against the narrative. Outside allowable discourse. Contradicts official stance. Should be dismissed as a conspiracy theory or Russian propaganda.
Are you reading from a Chris Wray memo?
I wonder how long before the editor of this newspaper is forced out. Pfizer is above media scrutiny.
You betcha he was. He was one of the main instigators, along with Mister MS-DOS.
Die Welt is a somewhat 2nd tier newspaper in Germany with daily circulation of 160K.
The largest is a tabloid. BILD. Circulation 1M+. The next two are not tabloids and larger than Die Welt, which is 4th.
This is not all that meaningful a source.
Nice how Pfizer did the vaxxxx trials in far off Buenos Aires. Argentina’s economy has been awful, so Pfizer had not trouble finding people who they could pay to participate in the vaxxxx trials.
If trials had been done here, the adverse reaction and deaths information would have leaked out.
OK Here’s your choice if you are CEO of pfizer
Be the first to market with Fauci/CDC Government-supported MRNA vaccine in the middle of a hotly politicized pandemic with Tens of $$$ Billions of Fed.gov contracts on the line, and double your stock price.
OR
Take your time on studies, look deeply into anomalies, figure out why your vaccine is causing heart and vascular problems in a minority of patients. Re-calibrate and start again
WHAT do you choose?
Fraud invalidates their immunity from liability.
Got it. ONLY read the largest MSM sources. Otherwise, its misinformation. No one else can be trusted.
That's why you only read WaPo and NY Times, right?
4 l8r bump!
They put a waiver in the contract to give them immunity for fraud and bad faith. That tells us that they knew exactly what they were doing. How can a government grant them such immunity? It’s crazy.
The interpretation of the data cited in this piece is accurate and consistent with what has been reported by other (non-corporate media) sources.
You don’t deal with “adverse data” in a clinical trial study by removing or expunging the patient from the study. That is deliberate fraud.
The trial data is generally consistent with what we are seeing in the real world - watch Ed Dowd’s recent presentation on the data analytics (interviewed for an hour by Tucker Carlson).
https://rumble.com/v2ailv0-tucker-carlson-interview-ed-dowd.html
Bttt
So why not Moderna also? I know Moderna is paying royalties to the US… are they paying them to Germany as well.
#PayToPlay #Corruptocracy.
As a former hospital attorney who dealt with drug trials all the time, if the information as reported is correct the trial should have been shut down long before these shots came on the market.
The original Pfizer results that were released in late 2020. Even after they scrubbed the report (an early whistle-blower highlighted that Pfizer wasn't being forthright in their test procedures -- promptly getting her fired after the FDA immediately ratted her out), it showed more deaths and heart issues with the vaccinated cohort vs the not vaccinated cohort.
Admittedly the differences were statistically insignificant (there were only 2000 people in each cohort), but the differences in the number of CoVid deaths between both groups were also significant. I think there were two deaths attributed to CoVid in the unvaccinated group vs one in the vaccinated group. So Fauci and the media lackeys were all crowing about a nearly 100% relative efficacy rate... Total crap.
You want good, impartial sources? Get out of the US in your search.
Think in terms of Qatar. Or India. Not aligned with anyone. And they have the money to fund reportage.
If it doesn’t come from them, it likely has agenda in it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.