Dissolution of Spike Protein by Nattokinase (Peter McCullough)

SubStack ^ | February 21, 2023 | Peter McCullough

[Golden Eagle]

Ok great. I appreciate that. I said earlier that I believe there is a lot of good in you. I’d just like to have you on my side more in this battle, which is being much more skeptical of Big Gov and Big Pharma, who basically hold all the cards, verses being skeptical of little people like Dr. McCullough, who I believe to be an honest man, who had his life destroyed by the medical establishment.

That is not a challenge for you to now unload all you believe you know about McCullough, just for you to further consider who is David, and who is Goliath, in this battle. Thanks.

[CatHerd]

It’s easy to a sympathize with an underdog. It’s human nature. I have done it myself. More than you can guess.

But when it comes to truth and facts, there are only truth and facts. I am not interested in a “side”. Sides be damned. I am only interested in truth and facts.

If you like to think you are on the side of David vs Goliath, fine. It looks to me more like a case of Big Gov/Pharm vs Snake Oil grifters. Color me cynical. Perhaps I am.

[fr_freak]

Hence, while thinking this, they flat out lied when they claimed masks were useless — and later Fauci had to admit they lied because they were afraid we little people would snag all the masks which were in short supply, leaving too few for frontline healthcare workers.

Nope. Fauci's name is on a study done regarding the Spanish flu, which determined that masks, which were used quite a bit back then and sometimes even mandated, didn't do a thing to stop the spread of the virus, and, in fact, may have caused many more problems than not wearing one, such as bacterial pneumonia and the like.

Fauci was telling the truth when he said masks don't do any good. He lied later when he said "Whoops I didn't mean that." He did, because his own study told him so.

Also, remember that, in the begining, Jan - Feb 2020 time frame, they were pushing masks and lockdowns based on a flawed computer model that said 2 million dead Americans by summer. Later, when Fauci promoted masks, he said that cloth masks still worked. Well, if that were true, then he could have said in Feb 2020 to use cloth masks instead of medical masks, saved medical masks for doctors and supposedly saved American lives by getting people to wear masks. Even if cloth masks had a 10% reduction in infection, that would have translated to 200,000 people saved according to their model-based claims. Yet he said "They don't work."

Either Fauci lied the first time and put hundreds of thousands of lives at risk, or lied the second time to promote a fraud, or the whole thing was a fraud from the beginning. There is no other option here.

The whole dog and pony show being successful is dependent on people having short memories and not paying attention and, well, unfortunately, that is the case.

[Golden Eagle]

It looks to me more like a case of Big Gov/Pharm vs Snake Oil grifters.

You don't believe in supplements? How about N-A-C? Are you aware the FDA tried to have the supplement banned, until they were sued over it? Is N-A-C "snake oil?" BTW, "snake oil" was actually the big city pharmaceutical product of the time, not a natural supplement.

[CatHerd]

In other words, nobody to like on either “side”. It’s certainly not easy, but you gotta get into the nitty gritty and press and press to find truth and facts. No, it’s not easy. Unless you simply believe one side (Fauci & Friends) or the other (Kirsch, Naomi, etc.).

Take either side to task ... and you start to get interesting questions.

But it is far easier and more comfortable to pick a side. I can’t blame anyone for doing that. Respect their stance is another matter.

Nope. Not picking a “side” here. Truth and facts only. Again, this is a freaking virus. Why allow the Dems to politicize it? Why fall into their trap? Why should there be “sides” when it comes to a stupid virus? It’s ridculous!

[grey_whiskers]

Talking to yourself again?

= = = = = =

The fatal flaw in your stratagem, is that you use ad hominem to discredit what you call a "side" (*) while being tactfully reticent about open deliberate, constant, continuous bald-faced lies on the other side as well as the tens of billions of dollars of profit accruing to that side.

And, you go out of your way to attack any studies showing efficacy for non-jab approaches to COVID; and go out of your way to belittle any evidence for widespread harm from the jabs: while exaggerating, and presenting as "typical" of the side, the most click-baity attacks on the jabs, ignoring the rigorous ones.

(*) not just you. Peter Hotez wrote an editorial in Nature attacking what he called the "Disinformation Dozen" (and which he associated with, I'm not kidding, Russia, Russia, Russia. It's *always* the same playbook, and always the same solution: more draconian power)

[Chgogal]

Interesting.

[grey_whiskers]

On masks:

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=240690

also

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2493952/pdf/annrcse01509-0009.pdf

[Golden Eagle]

Why should there be “sides” when it comes to a stupid virus?

Quite simple to me.

An unnecessary "vaccine" was rushed through at "warp speed" under the pretense it would stop the spread of the new flu (0.5% death rate), which turned out to be a lie, and the carnage per the official government stats is 3 times more deaths resulted from that vaccine than all other vaccines in history, combined.

Verses what, people who are upset about that, and are having to fight to even get their hands on data to review, because the vaccine creators/approvers have tried to hide or destroy it all?

[CatHerd]

That is your take, and you are entitled to it. Good night.I am getting tired here, understandable given my time zone.

Sleep well and be well!

[Golden Eagle]

Thank you, you too!

[Pelham]

“An unnecessary “vaccine” was rushed through at “warp speed” under the pretense it would stop the spread of the new flu (0.5% death rate),”

The vaccines were designed to target the spike of the original archaic virus. The archaic virus and the variants sharing its spike ceased to circulate after the vaccines were released. Explain how that is a “pretense to stop the spread”. Maybe according to your reasoning it’s purely a coincidence that the archaic virus died out, leaving behind only Omicron with its unique spike.

As for the “0.5% death rate”, how exactly would that be known in 2020 when Warp Speed was launched? Covid isn’t a flu virus despite what the ignorant like to tell themselves. It’s a SARS virus and the only other SARS outbreak killed nearly 10% of those infected. Its cousin virus MERS killed 30%. That was the reason why virus hunters were scared of Covid. They didn’t have the luxury of knowing what future data would reveal.

[Golden Eagle]

What are you talking about?

New estimate by CDC reduces COVID-19 death rate to just 0.26% (IFR) from WHO’s 3.4% (CFR)

Sun 24 May 2020

https://in.dental-tribune.com/news/new-estimate-by-the-cdc-brings-down-the-covid-19-death-rate-to-just-0-26-as-against-whos-3-4/

For the first time, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has given a realistic estimate of the overall death rate for COVID-19, which in its most likely scenario is 0.26 %. They estimate a 0.4 % fatality rate among the symptomatic cases. If you consider their projection that 35% of all infected cases remain asymptomatic, the overall infection fatality rate (IFR) drops to just 0.26 %. This is almost exactly what the Stanford researchers had projected in April 2020.

[grey_whiskers]

Well done. See also the Diamond Princess.

[fr_freak]

Thanks for that

[fr_freak]

As for the “0.5% death rate”, how exactly would that be known in 2020 when Warp Speed was launched?...They didn’t have the luxury of knowing what future data would reveal.

The exact thing could be said about the "vaccines" themselves. Rushing out, not just a new vaccine, but one using a medical technology never before tried in humans (and only tried with disastrous results in animals) is the ultimate unknown. They could not possibly have known what the negative effects would be. For all they knew, the injuries from this experimental drug would outpace any of the good it would do. And, hey, look at what we got now.

Why in the world would someone justify using one unknown to fight another unknown? And the truth is that the experimental "vaccine" was the greater unknown because it has never been used before, but the human immune system is a pretty well known mechanism, and SARS and other such viruses are at least a known quantity, with a number of known possible treatments other than vaccines. It would be reasonable, then, to bet your money on the known quantity rather than turn the entire globe into a gaggle of guinea pigs.

[grey_whiskers]

Like HELL there are no sides.