Posted on 02/21/2023 9:02:52 AM PST by MtnClimber
“Pandemic treaty” likely to be signed this month.
Last year, conservative media ran reports about a “pandemic treaty” — it was a binding agreement between the World Health Organization and its member states, including these United States. It seemingly died (although it was only delayed), but now it’s been resurrected and reports suggest Biden is expected to unilaterally enter our country into the treaty which would subject American citizens to a global, medical police state. From an Epoch Times article via JD Rucker at America First Report:
Written under the banner of ‘the world together equitably,’ the zero draft grants the WHO the power to declare and manage a global pandemic emergency. Once a health emergency is declared, all signatories, including the United States, would submit to the authority of the WHO regarding treatments, government regulations such as lockdowns and vaccine mandates, global supply chains, and monitoring and surveillance of populations.
Known as the “zero draft”, delegates from WHO member states are set to gather and sign the document in just six days. (You can access the full document here.)
This might be a tough pill to swallow, but this is our fault too.
Of course we can blame the anti-President Trump crowd who actually voted for this, and we told them, we told them, it would be this bad. Additionally, this is the information age, and even with Big Tech colluding with the federal government in a campaign of censorship, one can still find factual reporting; after all, we’re clued in, so what’s their excuse?
But we Republicans/conservatives also bear responsibility. Too many in our ranks get along just to go along, and I surmise this comes from either apathy or cowardice — neither of which are the least bit acceptable.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
I predict that the resistance to this will get ugly.
Biden continues giving away our sovereignty to the globalists.
If its a treaty, the Senate needs to approve. Plenty of discussion at that point.
From who?
he just declared to the poles that nothing ism ore important than sovereignty- But of course we know he means for other countries- not ours-
Yeah. Since when does the president have the Constitutional authority to enter into a treaty?
Oh, that's right, our government is no longer bound by the Constitution, and our Congress certainly doesn't care.
“globalists”
Are like a terminal cancer. No matter what intervening medical treatment takes place the cancer will ultimately prevail.
Why do these articles always fail to be truthful, all treaties requires a 60 vote majority in the senate to be ratified. Biden can sign any forgiven agreement he wants, it is not binding.
The next president can immediately nullify the accord if not ratified by the senate.
“ The next president can immediately nullify the accord if not ratified by the senate”
Provided there isn’t another sham election of which there is never consequences
The Boston Tea Party did not precisely “start” the revolution, but it was a significant protest ... against a 3% tax ... on tea.
In Florida they want to make it illegal for your dog to stick its head out of your car window.
And Biden is surrendering our sovereignty to Nazis in Germany.
And I’m sitting here thinking, “Golly, I sure hope they don’t steal the next election too!”
I don't think Mitch McConnell would ignore the power of the Senate to approve treaties.
It needs to be UGLY.
Any outside entity directing our Republic is an attack on our sovereignty and must be engaged as any attack on the homeland would be.
Treaties require two-thirds of the Senate in order
to become binding. That's 67 Senators. Biden doesn't have
the votes unless 16 Republicans are bribed or become
squishy liberals and vote for it. But with some
Republicans you never know.
I suspect this treaty is the very thing all of the wars and rumors of wars is intended to distract us from.
One way or another, it will be the final nail in this country’s coffin.
Whether the treaty is binding or not is irrelevant when a nation has a government that ignores law to suit its own agendas.
Thanks for the correction, I knew it was 2/3, just got lazy when I said 60. I should have known better.
Outsourcing national security? What could go wrong??
.
Buck Fiden.
5.56mm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.