Posted on 02/20/2023 6:07:55 AM PST by ransomnote
A preprint study published in November 2022 revealed that the higher the countrywide covid vaccination rate the higher the covid deaths.
The study analysed participants from 108 countries using data from 9 worldwide websites with the aim to determine if there are any correlations between the percentage of countrywide covid deaths per population by the countries’ per cent vaccinated.
The study also found the higher the covid testing and more stringent the covid measures, the higher the covid deaths. In contrast, the higher the use of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, the lower the covid deaths.
Covid is a pandemic of wealthier and higher vaccinated nations.
By Joel Smalley
THIS preprint analysis of 108 countries is apparently close to being peer-reviewed. Its summary findings are important and may come as a surprise to those who have not been carefully monitoring the data as it emerged and reading the research, much of which only appeared on Substack.
Key Findings
- Higher countrywide covid-19 vaccination rates »» higher covid-19 deaths per country population. [statistically significant to 1% confidence level]
- Higher country healthcare costs per capita »» higher covid-19 deaths per country population. [statistically significant to 1% confidence level]
- Higher annual income per capita »» higher covid-19 deaths per country population. [statistically significant to 1% confidence level]
- Higher countrywide covid-19 testing »» higher covid-19 deaths per country population. [statistically significant to 1% confidence level]
- Higher country covid response stringency (mandates, masking, social distancing, curfews, quarantine, business/school closings, banning or limiting public gatherings, lockdowns, travel ban, contact tracing, and PCR testing) »» higher covid-19 deaths per country population. [statistically significant to 5% confidence level]
- Higher countrywide hydroxychloroquine use »» lower covid-19 deaths per country population. [statistically significant to 10% confidence level]
- Higher countrywide ivermectin use »» lower covid-19 deaths per country population. [not statistically significant]
Since these papers have a habit of disappearing from public servers, here is a copy for download:
Commentary
It would seem that there was only a covid pandemic in countries that were rich enough for their government’s ill-conceived interventions to have a material impact on mortality and to shun the cheapest, safest and most widely available early treatments.
Every single policy not only failed to mitigate death from the virus but evidently made the situation worse. All social distancing policies, zealous testing and, worst of all, the subjection of populations to participate in a mass medical experiment without proper consent, resulted in increased mortality.
Is it only with the benefit of hindsight that we now know this? Absolutely not. The evidence was clear within weeks of every intervention, hampered only by the untimely provision of the necessary data by the public “authorities” and the illegitimate censorship of “misinformation” by the mainstream media.
Further reading: Covid-19: The Evidence revisited – summer 2022, HART Group, 10 November 2022
Will you now hold all of those responsible accountable for these failures?
It starts by making it clear to your local MP. And it escalates from there…
Julie Marson, MP for Hertford and StortfordAbout the Author
Joel Smalley is a blockchain architect and an early-stage, polymath data-driven technologist. He has a background in capital markets, biotechnology, retail payments and blockchain architecture. He conducts pro bono Covid data analysis for legal challenges and independent media seeking the truth. He regularly publishes articles on his Substack ‘Dead Man Talking’ which you can subscribe to HERE.
ransomnote wrote: “The countries with high vaccination rates have high death rates. The countries with low vaccination rates have low death rates.”
You still don’t understand the difference between causation and correlation.
”More incentivized”?! That’s a funny way to say propagandized and coerced by their government, the media, and employers.
No they didn't.
When were you threatened with a concentration camp?
https://greatgameindia.com/covid-prison-camps-new-york/ Check out this lovely resort in Australia:
Not really. Ivermectin only works in the imagination of propaganda spewing fools like Malone, Mercola, etc.
Yes, really. The frankenshots only work in the fevered imaginations and machinations of murderous tools like you and your boss, Jeff.
Starting with the homeless in LA, there weren’t high death numbers. Many developing countries were able to put in other protocols that worked. In Bangladesh, people were trained to use a nasal spray with hydrogen peroxide. Think about the study that found listerine users being less likely to contract the virus, and this protocol made sense.
Ol' Duke here is a paid shill. Why argue with him? As this thread should indicate, all this clown has left are his pharma talking points, and he's just looking for any excuse to cram them into the discussion, even when they don't make any sense in context.
The extraordinary thing is that this silly a-hole is still getting paid to spout his nonsense, even though he's really bad at his job. Still, nice work if you can get it, I suppose. Of course, except for the loss of intellectual integrity and all that.
“causation and correlation.”
Heh, the last refuge of the shill.
That said, what this whole thing means to me is there is some serious correlation. Now we need to investigate and prove causation.
See but a shill would be happy to leave it at “causation is not correlation” and leave it right exactly there, forever.
No, I think we need to study causation... because there is a loooot of smoke.
I really enjoy tweaking these rand corp bots.
That is just sophistry. So I guess you found your favored expert on the subject. Your tag line is like a confession.
They tried it here too! In NY I think.
The shills will laugh and jeer that it didn’t even come close to passing.
But they tried it. And they will try it again. And it will get closer each time. The shill/commie doesn’t want us paying attention to this.
Bullseye!
“The study also found the higher the covid testing and more stringent the covid measures, the higher the covid deaths.
In contrast, the higher the use of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, the lower the covid deaths.”
Remember old hydroxychloroquine?
How many lives (and injuries) could have been prevented with those 2 drugs and vitamins.
Pandemic Who?
Sirius Lee wrote: “Check out this lovely resort in Australia”
when did you move to Australia?
When did New York pass that legislation.
Sirius Lee wrote: “No they didn’t.”
Oh, but the COVID death rate has been declining due to the vaccinations.
DariusBane wrote: “That is just sophistry. So I guess you found your favored expert on the subject. Your tag line is like a confession.”
My tag line is an accusation of those here on FR who continually seek out those who spew their anti-vaxxer propaganda.
Sarcazmo wrote: “No, I think we need to study causation... because there is a loooot of smoke.”
Great, until then you’ll have to leave it at correlation.
Yep, right on cue, like I predicted.
No, because I’m not an fool.
Imagine I’m wandering around the jungle, and I start seeing lion prints... then start seeing lion crap... I start thinking there might be a lion around.
But then the medicine man Dugway Dubaku tells me correlation is not causation, and I should ignore my lying eyes and common sense until there is a study done to prove there is a lion around.
But damned if Dugway Dubaku never gets around to the study. Imagine that.
Meanwhile, the tracks and scat get fresher and stinkier. Still Dubaku tells me to ignore the signs.
I would have to be some kind of raging idiot to not take precautions for a lion. And I should also regard Dubaku with extreme skepticism.
Take the medical mumbo-jumbo and the complex numbers and statistics out of the mix which are used to confuse and obfuscate and this example is what we’re reduced to.
Sarcazmo wrote: “Imagine I’m wandering around the jungle, and I start seeing lion prints... then start seeing lion crap... I start thinking there might be a lion around.”
You would have evidence that a lion caused those.
Right now, you have evidence that COVID kills people.
“Right now, you have evidence that COVID kills people.”
Horsefeathers. I have Dugway Dubaku telling me COVID kills people.
My observation, personal and otherwise, is the exact opposite. My entire family and a slew of coworkers had COVID. The Dugway Dubakus ramped up the PCR cycles and counted motorcycle accidents as deaths. That what I have evidence of.
I think that has more to do with Omicron and better treatments. There wasn't much difference in the covid death count in my county during the vaccine rollout and last winter(2021/2022).
The main cause of death from COVID-19 was oxidative stress caused by glutathione deficiency resulting from the virus binding to and blocking the ACE2 receptors in the endothelial cells of the lungs and blood vessels.
Blocking the ACE2 receptors prevents the body from signaling the need to regenerate the glutathione antioxidant, causing free radicals (super-oxidants) to bind with hydrogen creating hydrogen peroxide inside the body. Glutathione breaks down the H2O2 back into H20 and O2. Glutathione deficiency allows the H2O2 to damage the vital organs, resulting in death.
Binding to the ACE2 receptor also blocks the signaling of interferon, slowing down the body's immune response to COVID-19.
In hindsight, a regimen of a zinc ionophore (i.e., over-the-counter quercetin or prescribed hydroxychloroquine) and zinc slows the replication of the virus in blood cells, allowing time for daily doses of NAC (N-Acetylcysteine) to keep glutathione levels high.
A hot-cold treatment, such as alternating hot and cold showers or hot spa/sauna followed by cold showers will stimulate the body's generation of interferon, keeping the body's immune system on alert.
Initially, doctors were treating the symptoms (with ventilators) and not the causes. It wasn't until someone correlated glutathione deficiency in seniors with high fatality in seniors that the first inklings of what was really going on began to emerge.
-PJ
I think it cuts both ways. You must ignore a great deal of troubling evidence to dismiss the danger posed by these vaccines.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.