Posted on 01/22/2023 11:53:27 AM PST by ransomnote
They lied to you. Even "Debunk the Funk" couldn't debunk this result. Uh oh.
Jan 19Executive Summary
Top study shows people with more jabs were more likely to get COVID than people with fewer jabs.
They lied, people died.
Introduction
Here’s Figure 2 from the Cleveland Clinic study (posted December 19, 2022) which looked at 51,011 working-age people who work at the Cleveland Clinic who have various vaccination status.
People with more jabs were more likely to get COVID than people with fewer jabs.
They started the clock for everyone at the same time: on the day the bivalent COVID-19 vaccine first became available to employees.
As you can see, people with more shots were more likely to get COVID and the differences were statistically significant.
Attempts to debunk the study
The pro-vaccine camp HATES this study because it goes against the narrative.
If the study proved their point, they’d be praising it and not criticizing it at all!
Eugene Gu said that it wasn’t peer-reviewed! This is typical. Rather than attack the data or a mistake, point out that the journals aren’t going to publish it.
Debunk the Funk created a YouTube video where he said that the start point was arbitrarily chosen and that the y-axis was “not huge.” The y-axis is linear and the differences at day 91 are statistically significant. I’m serious. Listen at 1:08 in the video. This guy is a PhD!!!
Then he said look at this other study which didn’t measure the same thing.
If you want to debunk the study, Mr. Funk, you need to show a comparable study that showed a different result. There isn’t one because nobody will get such a study published because it goes against the narrative. Duh.
This test was fair. Everyone started off at the same point in time, it’s the Cleveland Clinic employees who are regularly tested, and it’s all working age people. It’s real-world study. The sizes in the groups were sufficient to establish statistical significance of the result.
The pro-vax community hates this but as you can see from “Debunk the Funk”’s video, they cannot find a way to dispute it.
Oh, and he said the study wasn’t well designed. Wow. For the purposes of Figure 2, what was the DESIGN FLAW that they could have fixed? He doesn’t mention that.
The study is real world at the hospital. I don’t know what more they could have done, do you?
The elephant in the room
Thank you to Alex Berenso
Thanks to Alex Berenson for writing about this.
Alex also wrote just now about the Chinese study showing after 4 shots of the vaccine, your immune system is damaged and it’s not clear for how long. But it was in humanized mice, not people. You should read his post. This is important.
He wrote:
Mice who received more than four Covid vaccine jabs had a collapse in their ability to fight the coronavirus, Chinese researchers have found.
and
Last month, researchers at the Cleveland Clinic reported that they had found “the higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19."
And last week a very large French study reported that a second mRNA booster was less effective than the first at every comparable time interval - and that after four months it actually raised the risk for infection compared to people who had not received it.
My polls
They consistently show the more jabs, the worse the outcomes.
For boosters, only 1 place out of 102 reported they were beneficial.
How will they explain that one? Can we see THEIR data?
Summary
The Cleveland Clinic study kills the narrative. The authors are pro-vaccine!
The result was clear: the more shots you get, the more likely you are to get COVID.
That’s why the study wasn’t covered by any mainstream media. And banned from YouTube.
And that’s why this study by top people at the Cleveland Clinic will never be published in the peer-reviewed scientific journals. Because that’s the way science works.
PING
Facebook is in BIG TROUBLE
It has just been discovered that the Facebook Covid vaccine Fat-Checkers are funded by vaccine companies. pic.twitter.com/PPleW4182F— Deplorable4trump2024 (@PTRUMPFORTX2020) January 20, 2023
PING
This is completely normal.
So. Shut. Up. 🤡
I’m unvaxxed and got the Covid once. It wasn’t that bad I just felt weak and didn’t want to get out of bed. I didn’t know what it was at the time. My SIL has been vaxxed and boosted and has had Covid numerous times and has developed a mysterious eye infection which is resistant to antibiotics. I hope she doesn’t lose her sight over this.
Odd sort of vaccine.
Side effects may include ingrown hairs, diarrhea, stroke, heart attack, infertility, autoimmune disease, or death
Vax harder, retards.
Only if one still thinks any of this was ever about protecting public health.
I hope your sister-in-law gets better. I assume that there are more people who do not suffer debilitating side effects from the vaccines than those who do.
But my lying eyes tell a different story. In addition to those who my wife and I know who have died or had debilitating injuries... we know a bunch of people who look like they have aged ten years in the last couple. There are some who we hardly even recognize.
My wife and I have been around people numerous times who have tested positive for Covid. Most of them have been vaxxed and boosted. We got what we assumed was Delta after her sister and her husband came to visit about a year and a half ago. This seemed to give us natural immunity up until recently.
Unfortunately, the latest version of Omicron can sneak past both natural and vaccine induced immunity. We picked it up after going to the Dentist just before Christmas and neither of us has recovered completely yet. The authorities are trying to tell people that it is less serious than Delta, but this hasn’t been our experience.
It is just something that you will either get or you won’t. There are several regimens of vitamins and nutrients along with exercises that likely help keep your immune system zoomed up. At this point we would not touch the jabs with a ten foot pole despite the challenging illness that we came down with.
The FR discussion thread about this article is here: Aw Crap....(An explanation for greater COVID infection rate for the most VAXXed and Boosted).
That article discussed the immune response of moving through the immunoglobulin stages (IgG1-4) and how repeated vaccinations and boosters is compromising the body's immune responses. It's well worth a read.
Interestingly, none of the usual posters made an appearance on THAT thread. Was it because they couldn't debunk the findings?
-PJ
ADE should have prompted a parabolic response, not a linear progression.
Talk to your VACCINATOR ??? WTHeck???
https://twitter.com/CDCgov/status/1616533650287329280?s=20&t=7XgOJmjMuzu0m7A3aBE5JQ
From quote “talk to your vaccinator”...
Bwahahahahahaha.
No such person to talk to in my case.
Nuremberg trials is the only way we get these folks to sit down and shut up.
For us pure bloods, it's worth checking out yesterday's Scott Adams, where he tells us he is going to eat crow, and then eats it (figuratively).
Vaccinator = executioner.
I have a relative that I would bet money is vaxed ... he was complaining to me last weekend about the multiple “styes” he’s been getting.
Yep....these sickos are trying to normalize folks having a ‘vaccinator’.
Beyond evil.
Interesting comment. Can you explain why?
It looks like the rate of increase starts to increase after day 70. Maybe the timeframe is too short to see the parabolic shape that might be just forming?
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.